“highly significant”

The increase was consistent across all three Hoxb regions tested (supplementary Table S2 ) and the difference in modification levels between the VPA-treated and untreated Hox genes was highly significant (H4K8ac, P = 0.006, H3K4me3, P = 0.0008; this and all subsequent comparisons use Student's two-tailed paired t test).

Thus, when comparing anatomical locations, in the cervix 2.0% of the HPV16 samples had a mutation in the E6 gene versus 18.5% in the oropharynx, demonstrating a highly significant difference (p = 0.006).

Mixed models indicate highly significant correlation between self and assessor ratings, both for all fourteen sub-sections of the TBC (highest p < 0.006), and all six domains in the GRS (highest p < 0.047).

5k ) as compared to their counterpart mice bearing the fecal microbiota from HFHS-C donors, which was highly significant (post-hoc analysis: p = 0.006) at the 15 min peak of insulin secretion), and further illustrated by calculation of the GSIS during the peak of insulin response (Fig. 5l ). 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the gut microbiota composition revealed that FMT-HFHS-PM mice had greater alpha diversity than FMT-HFHS-C mice, represented by Shannon and Simpson’s reciprocal indices, consistent with data from donor mice (Fig. 3f, g and 5m–n ).

Additionally, a highly significant microplastic exposure × contestant role interaction was found for the ‘duration of rapping bouts' ( F 1 = 7.73, p = 0.006).

Applicants identifying as female had a highly significant reduction in the odds of receiving an offer of a national training number compared with male counterparts (aOR=0.44, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.79, p=0.006) ( table 2 ).

The regression was highly significant ( F 1,38 = 8.594, P = 0.006), with a coefficient of determination, r 2 = 0.193 ( Figure 2 ).

The tendency was slightly opposite in girls, resulting in a highly significant interaction between OPV at birth and sex (p = 0.006).

Merging the ten subjects resulted in a highly significant improvement in SRT50 ( P = 0.006).

serricorne showed significant relative preferences for paeonal at doses of 1 μg ( χ 2 = 4.261, df = 1, P = 0.039), 10 μg ( χ 2 = 5.565, df = 1, P = 0.018), and 1000 μg ( χ 2 = 5.000, df = 1, P = 0.025), and highly significant relative preferences at doses of 100 μg ( χ 2 = 7.681, df = 1, P = 0.006) and 500 μg ( χ 2 = 10.083, df = 1, P = 0.001), when compared with mineral oil (Fig. 3 ).

Moran's test detected highly significant but weakly positive spatial autocorrelation (Moran statistic I = 0.08, p = .006), meaning that neighboring sites tended to display similar temporal trends.

Those receiving the food waste message responded with a highly significant reduction ( p = 0.006).

There was a highly significant association between mean survival time and receipt of chemotherapy ( P = .006).

so the test includes just cut-marked, percussion marked and tooth marked specimens) the effect of instrumentation assistance type on correspondence in identifying bone surface modifications is still highly significant (Mann-Whitney U = 4.5, z = −2.74, p = 0.006).

fluminea (Independent-samples Test, F = 0.239, P = 0.022) and a highly significant difference in the medium size (Independent-samples Test, F = 1.512, P = 0.006).

Random intercept for Participant was significant [β = 1.728, SE = 0.086, 95% CI = [1.56, 1.90], t (47.99) = 20.117, p < 0.001] and fixed-effects factor WordOrder was highly significant [β = −0.098, SE = 0.035, 95% CI = [−0.17, −0.03], t (808.19) = −2.78, p = 0.006].

Crucially, our multivariate regression model demonstrated that a composite favorable response—defined by concurrent achievement of QRS narrowing ≥20 ms, LVESV reduction ≥15%, and LVEF improvement ≥10% at 6–12 months—was a highly significant predictor of event-free survival (Overall model p = 0.006).

The difference between groups A and B was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.006).

A highly significant difference was found in the presence of HRF, more frequent in the PD group ( X 2 = 7.50; p = 0.006).

Node-negative cases without chemotherapy In locally limited tumors without nodal involvement and without known administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, both proteases were highly significant prognostic factors for overall survival (uPA: positive vs negative 91 months (CI: 78–103 months) vs 119 months (CI: 108–129 months); P = 0.006 ( BH ST 0.017) (Fig. 3 a); (PAI-1: positive vs negative 94 months (CI: 84–103 months) vs 125 months (CI: 114–136 months); P = 0.004 BH ST 0.025 (Fig. 3 b).

A Fisher’s Exact analysis determined the risk of death within 30 days of operation in COVID-19-positive, ASA grade 3 to 5 patients was highly significant; OR 8.9, 95% CI 2.2 to 36.1, with a RR 7.5 (95% CI 2.2 to 25.7), p = 0.006.

On comparing the blood indices between the biologics and non-biologics groups of PSA patients, there was a statistically highly significant reduction in red cell distribution width (RDW%) at the biologics group than non-biologics ( p < 0.006), where there was a statistically highly significant increase in Hb (hemoglobin)/RDW ratio and Hb/platelets ratio at the biologics group than non-biologics ( p < 0.005).

They indicated a highly significant enhancement of performance for the symbolic group, t (51) = 3.33; p = .006, η 2 = 0.178, but not for the non-symbolic, t (51) = 0.45; ns, η 2 = 0.005, or control, t (51) = 0.23; ns, η 2 = 0.001, groups.

from All India Institute of Medical Sciences reported 65% patients to have an improvement of 4 or more points in NIHSS score at 48 h with alteplase.[ 9 ] We observed highly significant difference between NIHSS scores at baseline and 24 h ( P = 0.006) which is in agreement with the previously published studies on tenecteplase.[ 4 ] In the present study, 78.5% patients had an excellent recovery at 90 days with mRS score being 0 or 1, which is even better than the results of a recent RCT in which excellent recovery was observed in 54% subjects.[ 4 ] One patient (7%) in our study developed SICH and additionally, aspiration pneumonia with subsequent death.

At the same time, for product yield (Y 2 ), both quadratic effects (X 1 2 and X 2 2 ) are highly significant ( p = 0.006 and p = 0.004, respectively), demonstrating a complex nonlinear response with an optimum.