“highly significant”

Holter ECG revealed rhythm and/or conduction disturbances in 62% of CS(+) patients and 30% of CS(−) patients; this difference was highly significant ( p = 0.009).

However, in the context of the RNA stem–loop and the extended stem–loop construct, co-transfection of the MS2-SRp55 plasmid led to a highly significant enhancement of splicing ( Figure 5 B and C, compare lanes 3–6; P -value = 0.009 and 0.002).

The association between PANC3 positivity and SAP (as defined by the CTSI) was highly significant (p = 0.009).

This difference was highly significant ( p = 0.009) ( Table 3 ), reflecting a delayed onset of the pubertal growth spurt among the UCLP participants in comparison with the non-CLP participants. 4.

No significant difference was found for >1.8 s between blue- and red-light stimulus ( t (14) = -1.2, p = 0.125, d = -0.31), but highly significant difference in pupillary change to blue- compared to red-light for <1.7 s ( t (14) = -2.71, p = 0.009, d = -0.70), see Fig 4 .

Comparison of the entire group (n=8) showed highly significant down-regulation when quantitated by relative densitometry units (p<0.009).

Association of Clinicopathologic Characteristics with Diagnosis of POD Univariate correlation analysis revealed a highly significant correlation between the occurrence of POD and elevated ACCI in our retrospective cohort ( p = 0.009).

The log-rank test (Mantel-Cox) yielded a highly significant result ( P = 0.009).

The analysis showed that the between-groups treatment effect on ADOS scores continued all through this time (OR −8.2; −1.53, −0.12, p = 0.02), giving a highly significant cumulative effect of the therapy [marginal log-odds effect size of 0.55 (95% CI 0.14–0.91; p = 0.009)] ( 29 ; see Figure 1 ).

This finding was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.009).

Differences in slopes were highly significant between 0 and 2 doses of ALB ( P = .009) and between 2 and 1 dose ( P = .004) but not significant between 1 and 0 dose ( P = .419).

Patients infected only with OROV showed a higher non-significant frequency of males (52.4%), but in the case of OROV + DENV co-infection the frequency of males (66.7) was highly significant (p < 0.009).

In the study, the association of periodontal status to DMFT was highly significant ( r = 0.161, P = 0.009), suggesting that young adult students with poor periodontal status have more prevalence of decayed teeth.

Notably, GATA3 exhibited a highly significant enrichment of its binding motif ( p ‐value = 0.009) and showed the greatest predicted alteration in binding affinity due to the SNP among all TFs analyzed (FABIAN score = −0.289) ( Figure 2 A ).

Approximately half the comparisons based on locus Lpol03 yielded highly significant F ST values after Benjamini–Yekutieli correction (ranging from 0.0772 to 0.2543, P < 0.00908).

Overall, a third (7/21) of the individuals with some type of amino acid mutation were asymptomatic, while the other two-thirds presented some symptom or disease associated with the presence of HTLV-1, a highly significant difference ( p = 0.0091).

Specifically, and as compared with untreated hamsters, protection was highly significant at multiple time points during the infection course ( p = 0.0091, p = 0.0014, p = 0.0005, p = 0.0005 at 6, 8, 11 and 12 days post-infection respectively).

Effects of soil characteristics and management practices on AMF communities OTU richness significantly decreased with increasing Olsen phosphorus content (Table 1 ); there was a highly significant negative correlation ( r = − 0.21, p = 0.0091) between OTU richness and soil Olsen P in the derived savanna zone (Fig.

α-Sarcomeric actinin expression was highly significant ( p = 0.0091) in Aza+AA group at the end of the treatment not only when compared to control but also when compared to Aza group ( p = 0.0001) ( Fig 4B ).

In particular reduction of hyperplasia was highly significant ( p = 0.0091) (Fig. 7 c and Additional file 6 : Figure S5).

In the same period, CRC age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates decreasing trends were highly significant with increasing screening ( p = 0.0091).

The difference in lymphoma incidence in pfp −/− p53 +/+ (10 out of 20) and pfp +/+ p53 +/+ (1 out of 16) was highly significant ( P = 0.0091 Fisher's exact test; Fig. 1a and Fig. d ).

The presence of peripheral network-like structures with the occurrence of central scar-like areas was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.0091).

These data were used to build a probability distribution for deriving a given amount of coexpression, based on this coexpression of Ank2 and Tsc2 was found to be highly significant (coexpression = 0.9031, p = 0.0091), Fig. 3 , (Supplementary Note 2).

The difference between MDA-MB-231 cells and their supernatant was highly significant for both lagtime (p-value=0.0091) and peak (p-value=0.0039).