“highly significant”

The negative correlation between Pn and NPQ is highly significant (r = −0.74, P ≤ 0.01).

Results were considered statistically significant at P <0.05 and highly significant at P <0.01.

The importance of Ptmx was highly significant ( p < 0.01), and the importance of Age was significant ( p < 0.05).

Although both NAG and β 2 -microglobulin increased in individuals from all areas ( p < 0.01), albumin tended to decrease, with a highly significant decline in the highly polluted area ( p < 0.01).

The significance was considered as significant at P < 0.05 (*) and highly significant at P < 0.01 (**) and P < 0.001 (***). 2.13 Ethics statement All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Sun Yat-sen University, concerning the handling of chicken embryos as well as animal experiments.

Combining ability and maternal effects Parentals and families had highly significant ( P ≤ 0.01) general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) effects, respectively, for CT, CW, yields of storage roots and vines, total biomass and dry matter content (DMC) of storage roots (Table 6 ).

5 and Tetep were higher than the survival rate on IR50, with a highly significant difference (P < 0.01) ( Table 1 ).

The statistical analysis of slaughter traits, taking into account the right half-carcass, showed highly significant relationships ( p ≤ 0.01) between the rs80860411 polymorphism and the width of the loin eye, the carcass meat content, and the weight of primary cuts in the Pulawska breed.

On day 21 postpartum, the 0.2% group and 0.4% ATC group had highly significant decreased serum content of ALB ( p < 0.01).

Specifically, mean blood glucose level, TIR1, TAR1, and TAR2 were extremely significant ( p < 0.001); TIR2 was highly significant ( p < 0.01); and TBR was significant ( p < 0.05), indicating robust associations.

Significant differences were considered at p < 0.05, and highly significant differences were considered at p < 0.01.

Under proinflammatory conditions, the fluorescence of hypericin, 3 or 5 μ M, respectively, is lowered, highly significant for 6 and 7 h incubation with 3 μ M hypericin ( P ≤ 0.01), and significant for the final value at 8 h ( P ≤ 0.05) for 5 μ M hypericin.

We found 10 genes (IL15, IL17A, EBI3, CCL3, CCL5, LTB, CSF2, IFNG, RANKl and NOS2) with highly significant differential expression ( P <0.01), 6 genes (IL2, IL8, IL10, TNF, TGFB1 and VEGFA) with significant differential expression ( P <0.05 but >0.01) and 5 genes (IL6, IL12A, CCL2, LTA) not correlated with the disease status according to Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA test ( Table 1 ).

Meanwhile, the T-2-treated groups (30 nmol/L~90 nmol/L) were shown to exhibit a highly significant and consistently reduced proportion of S and G2/M phase cells compared to the control group ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 4 ).

However, the rate constant of gas production (c) was highly significant ( p < 0.01), and it was lower for the first mixture compared to the other treatments.

A comparison of soil metal distributions between GC and WC systems showed that Cd concentrations had no significant change between cultivation systems ( p > 0.05), while Pb showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) across the two cultivation systems due to anthropogenic input.

Highly significant differences were noted between the victim and NFP groups in both the Ace index ( p < 0.01) and the Chao index ( p < 0.01), and a less significant difference in the Chao index was also detected ( p < 0.05).

The magnitude of the p values in Table S2 † indicated that the model primary terms A and B exerted highly significant effects on the response values ( p < 0.01).

The chi-square test was employed to assess the association between two categorical variables, with results considered statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.

Eight proteins (IL-2Rα, CRP, IL-8, ICAM-1, TIMP-1, TNFR1, HGF, and CA19.9) resulted in highly significant results ( P -value <0.01 for two-sample t tests comparing patients with and without GVHD).

Statistical differences were designated as significant if p -values were less than 0.05 (* p ≤ 0.05), and as highly significant if p -values were less than 0.01 (** p ≤ 0.01) or less than 0.001 (*** p ≤ 0.001). 3.

Effects of Environmental Factors on Bacterial Communities As shown in Figure 8 and Table 3 , the sample site sediment bacterial Chao1 index showed highly significant negative correlation with interstitial water DO, TN concentration and sediment TC content ( p < 0.01), significantly negatively correlated with interstitial water COD Mn concentration ( p < 0.05), and showed a highly significant positive correlation with sediment N content ( p < 0.01).

One-way ANOVA revealed no significant differences in the number of macrobenthic species across the three areas in 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2023 ( p > 0.05), while significant differences were observed in 2018 (F 2 = 5.14, p < 0.05), and highly significant differences were observed in 2024 (F 2 = 11.62, p < 0.01).

Abdominal compression resulted to be highly significant as well (p <0.01).

Differences are considered significant at p<0.05, highly significant at p<0.01 and very highly significant at p<0.001.