At 250 μM, 500 μM, 1000 μM, 2000 μM concentration, a highly significant (###, p < 0.01 and ***, p < 0.001) difference was observed.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
In comparison to the susceptible group, the resistant group exhibited a highly significant decrease in the levels of IgA and IL-1β in serum ( p < 0.01), while the content of TGF-β1 was significantly increased ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 2 ). 3.2.
However, much more dramatic changes in ANP mRNA expression and a large, highly significant decrease in the betaMHC/alphaMHC mRNA ratio was observed with captopril treatment of post-MI AKO mice (P<0.01).
A highly significant, linear decrease in pH was observed during fermentation (X 1 = −0.17, X 2 = −0.06, p < 0.01), indicating that each additional day and each increase in temperature significantly decreased the pH values in all kombucha products.
The differential action of the naked DNA correction on histone and non-histone MNase-sensitive particles was highly significant (Fisher’s exact test p < 0.01).
Bray-Curtis distances showed a highly significant overall effect of treatment (DPO vs PBS), time (D0, D7, D14), and their interaction ( p < 0.01).
The average pairwise inter-laboratory difference for δ 15 N col values was 0.4‰ ( Table 3 , below diagonal), with highly significant differences among laboratories (ANOVA, F 19,76 = 19.3, p<0.01).
Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05, highly significant at p < 0.01, and very highly significant at p < 0.001. 3.
The differences were considered to be statistically significant if p < 0.05, highly significant if p < 0.01, very highly significant if p < 0.001, or not statically significant if p > 0.05.
Using the non-parametric T-test there was no significant difference in the MTT values between the two groups ( t = 0.78; P = 0.43), but we detected statistically significant difference between groups in values of CBF ( t = 9.44; P = 0.0001) and CBV ( t = 10.47; P = 0.0001) (Table 1 ). There was highly significant correlation between CBF and CBV decrease in core lesion ( r = 0.841; P < 0.01) and decreased CBF ( r = 0.461; P < 0.01) with variable CBV values in penumbra locations ( r = 0.240; P < 0.05).
The skew was also highly significant in the shared goal condition (skew = −1.31, SE = .43, z = −3.05, p <.01), therefore, we used non-parametric statistics to test the effect of our manipulations.
Total 148 genes showed highly significant differential expression with adjusted P value < 0.01 wherein 55 genes were upregulated (log2foldchange > 1) and 93 genes were downregulated (log2foldchange < − 1) (Fig. 1 ).
Finally, the conception rates for recorded calving difficulties were 0.0% and 53.7%, respectively, representing a highly significant variation ( χ 2 = 17.033, p < 0.01).
Next, Pearson correlation coefficients were determined for each pair of OTUs and highly significant ( P < 0.01) correlations were visualized using Cytoscape ( Figure 5B ).
At the college stage, there was a significant difference in the dairy intake frequency ( p < 0.05) and highly significant differences in the BMI, FVC, sit-and-reach, standing long jump, 50 m, and total scores ( p < 0.01).
The results of the analysis of variance showed that treatment had a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.01) on BWG and a significant effect ( p ≤ 0.05) on FCR, but no significant effect ( p ≤ 0.05) on feed intake.
Analysis of VEGF expression in skin wound tissue showed that the vehicle control group had markedly lower VEGF levels compared to the 6% oregano extract group, with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01, Fig. 2 ) .
Furthermore, PPARGC1A , MYL2 , and MAP1LC3C exhibited a highly significant positive correlation with eye muscle area ( p < 0.01), alongside positive associations with other phenotypes ( Figure 2 F). 3.4.
Differences were considered significant if p < 0.05 (*) and highly significant when p < 0.01 (**) or p < 0.001 (***).
Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, and highly significant differences at p < 0.01.
Several parameters exhibited highly significant positive correlations ( p < 0.01), further emphasizing the link between sperm quality and reproductive traits.
Bootstrap tests of mediation indicate that all of the indirect effects of genetic affinity are highly significant (p < 0.01 in all cases).
The effect of the G2373A mutation was additive for TGW, grain area and length as indicated by the highly significant linear contrasts ( P ≤ 0.01) and the non-significant quadratic contrasts ( P > 0.27) for each of these traits.
The interaction of different lines and water status has a highly significant effect on CC, LA, PH, NNMS, BN, RWCL, and BIOMASS ( p < 0.01), a significant effect on SWPP ( p < 0.05), and no significant effect on the trait RECL. 2.2.
A statistically highly significant trend (p<0.01) of lengthening the growing season was observed in five elevation zones, and it was significant (p<0.05) in one zone ( Table 4 ).