The results of the statistical analysis showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.01) between each experimental group and the control group ( Figure 5 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Variety, area, and their interaction all exerted highly significant effects on PC ( p < 0.01).
A P value of <.001 was considered highly significant while a P value <.01 was considered significant.
This difference was found to be statistically highly significant ( p < 0.01).
A significance level of 0.05 was established, where “ns” denotes a non-significant result ( P > 0.05), “*” indicates a statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05), and “**” signifies a highly significant difference ( P < 0.01).
The highly significant p-values ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) provide robust statistical confidence in these findings, underscoring a potent biological effect rather than random variation.
3 C), and there was a highly significant positive correlation ( r = 0.97; P < 0.01) between MRCKα and β-casein mRNA abundance in these cells ( Fig. 3 E). 3.3.
This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.01) using the Kruskal-Wallis statistical test.
Furthermore, we observed a pattern, even if non-significant, of fatty acid synthase (FAS) to decrease ( Figure 7 ), FAS-associated protein with death domain (FADD) ( Figure 8 ) and, of peculiar interest, highly significant ( p < 0.01) adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) immunostaining ( Figure 9 ). 3.2.
Statistically significant differences were set at P < 0.05, and highly significant differences were set at P < 0.01.
Before the experiment, SVS ( Table 3 ) also showed a highly significant correlation with a feeling of vigor (0.58, p < 0.01) and positive feelings (0.42, p < 0.01), as well as a feeling of vigor (0.44, p < 0.01) and positive feelings (0.49, p < 0.05) after viewing ( Table 5 ).
The increase in the p-ERK1/2 levels was highly significant between the PANI/RC and the RC and the sham groups (P<0.01), while the levels of ERK1/2 were unchanged ( Fig. 3D ; P>0.05).
LCM A and B were highly significant for predicting both one-year mortality and LVEF response for both models (p<0.01).
Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.01.
Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, and asterisks indicate highly significant differences at p < 0.01.
After 24 h, compared with the control group, the proliferative activity of the cells gradually increased with increasing GSP concentration, reaching a maximum at the concentration of 150 μg/mL, and the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.01).
In addition, in 436 paired cord and maternal sera obtained from women at delivery, there is a highly significant correlation between the concentrations of Compound W in newborn cord and maternal sera (p<0.01) [ 49 ], ( Figure 6 ).
Data were considered significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.
Genotype-by-year interaction effects The combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) across the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons revealed highly significant differences (P < 0.01) among genotypes, years, and their interactions for nearly all investigated traits ( Table 6 ).
Results were considered significant with a p -value of p < 0.05 (*) and highly significant if the p -value was p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****). 3.
The preponderance of developing a high risk of 10-year CVD was highly significant among the age group of 51–60 years, males, who were smokers, obese, and hypertensive participants ( P < 0.01).
The p -values were shown, with significant differences highlighted with an asterisk (* p < 0.05) and highly significant differences with two asterisks (** p < 0.01).
3.2 Effect of Sinigrin on Serum Hepatic Parameters The results depicted in Figure 2 revealed that there was a highly significant ( p < 0.01) increase in the serum concentrations of liver damage markers after exposure to DEN these include; ALT ( Figure 2 A), AST ( Figure 2 B), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ( Figure 2 C), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) ( Figure 2 D), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ( Figure 2 E), and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ( Figure 2 F).
In contrast, Clostridium was significantly correlated with 193 differential metabolites ( P < 0.05), of which 41 showed highly significant correlations [ P < 0.01; Figure 5b ].
Comparison of MAGECAA v1.0 with the Original Manual Method As shown in Figure 4 , Spearman's correlation analysis identified that there is a highly significant linear correlation between MAGEc and MAGEo ( r = 0.998, resp.; P < 0.01), and the mean difference found in Bland-Altman plot was −0.03 ± 0.21, which was statistically significantly small.