“highly significant”

The t -test showed that the type of porcelain veneer restoration had a highly significant effect on the cervical marginal fit ( p ≤ 0.01).

For the analysis, we used IBM SPSS software version 24 (IBM Corp, 2016 ), and the existence of an association was assumed if P value < 0.05 and, highly significant if P value < 0.01 (Lwanga, Tye, & Ayeni, 1999 ).

Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences ( p ≤ 0.01) among genotypes for all the studied traits, indicating the presence of substantial genetic variability.

At concentrations of 2, 4, and 8 mM, GUO significantly rescued PGK12.1 cells from apoptosis ( P < 0.05), with a highly significant increase in cell viability at 8 mM GUO ( P < 0.01).

Correlation among Different Attributes of Sesame Plants and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Highly significant ( p -value < 0.01) and mostly positive correlation was observed among different attributes of sesame plants by separate and combined application of Caulobacter sp.

Importantly, the difference in CD68 expression between the MSC-Exo group and PBS group is highly significant ( P < 0.01) ( Figure 2(b) ). 3.5.

The difference between both the probability and subtraction model with four CPGs and the experimental values in the mean and median IPIs, and the IPI standard deviation was highly significant (P<0.01, Kruskal-Wallis Test, followed by Dunn's Multiple Comparisons Test, Table 1 ).

Correlation analysis Correlation analysis revealed that AsA and T-AsA showed highly significant positive correlations with GLDH, APX, MDHAR, and DHAR ( r ≥ 0.72, p < 0.01, Figure 6 ).

A Bonferroni correction was used as a post-hoc test ( p < 0.05: significant; p < 0.01: highly significant).

Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05 and highly significant at the level of P < 0.01, and tendencies were accepted when 0.05 < P < 0.1. 3.

Phosphorus Use Efficiency (PUE) in ajowan Analysis of variance showed that the main effects of cropping system, phosphorus fertilizer treatments, and their interactions—including cropping system × phosphorus fertilizer, year × cropping system, and year × phosphorus fertilizer were highly significant ( p < 0.01) for the phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) index in ajowan (Table 5 ).

WA showed a highly significant negative correlation ( p < 0.01) with ST, Bw, and FzW content and a significant positive correlation ( p < 0.05) with A 21 .

In the present study, whole-ear shading caused a significant (P≤0.05) reduction of WGS in CN12 and a highly significant reduction in CN19 (P≤0.01) ( Table 1 ).

Highly significant differences (P = 0.01) were found between the type of amino acids and their distributions in normal and cancerous tissues ( Table 4 ).

Differences were statistically labeled as significant [*] for p < 0.05 or highly significant [**] for p < 0.01.

The abundance of Euryarchaeota showed a highly significant positive correlation with serum IgM levels ( p < 0.01).

It ranged from 0.01 (between Can and Hort) to 0.36 (between Hort and Egy B); and reported to be highly significant (p<0.01).

Under the “yield” parameter for RE extracts ( Table 2 ), the correlations between yield and TPC/TFC were negative and highly significant ( P < 0.01).

The coefficient of correlation of marker TA194 with disease resistant gene ( FOC locus), Factor 1 was highly significant at P ≥ 0.01 (Table 6 ).

However, differences approached significance in the puna ( t 98 = 1.63, p = 0.07) and were highly significant in the prepuna habitat ( t 98 = 2.62, p = 0.01).

Total K showed highly significant closely relationship with lattice-K (r = 0.982**, p < 0.01), HCl–K (r = 0.901**, p < 0.01) and Non Ex-K (r = 0.841**, p < 0.01) ( Fig. 7 ).

The star * indicates a significant difference ( p < 0.05), ** a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01), and *** an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.001).

The results of the analysis of variance indicated that the effects of genotypes (G) and environments (E) were highly significant in the BC 1 population ( P < 0.01); however, the interaction between G and E (G × E) did not significantly affect the SL, SW, and L/W across the three environments ( S3 Table ).

When patients were split into 10 patients with an initial MELD score of >10 and 10 patients with an initial MELD score of ≤10, nine parameters showed a highly significant ( p < 0.01) difference between these two groups ( Table 2 (middle part)) and seven other parameters had a significant ( p < 0.05) difference (not presented).

With the lowest p value, 8 × MICs (Trial 5), and incubation was found highly significant ( p < 0.01) effect regarding inhibition of S. aureus and S. enterica ( Table 6 ).