“highly significant”

The HS + ST group’s body weight remained significantly lower than that of the ST group ( p -value < 0.05), and also showed a highly significant reduction compared to the CTL group ( p -value < 0.01).

The relative expression of CYP19A1 showed a dose-dependent highly significant decrease ( P < 0.01 or P < 0.001), 10 and 100 ng/mL GnIH significantly downregulated the expression of 3β-HSD ( P < 0.01 or P < 0.05); 1 and 10 ng/mL GnIH significantly downregulated the relative expression of StAR ( P < 0.05); 1 and 100 ng/mL GnIH significantly decreased the relative expression of LHR ( P < 0.05); although the expression of FSHR decreased, there was no significant difference between the treatment group and the control group.

Birth year and herd significantly affected BW ( p < 0.05) and WW, DWG, and YW ( p < 0.01), while sex, birth type, and dam age had highly significant effects on all traits ( p < 0.01).

Notably, all combinations involving lidocaine yielded highly significant results ( p < 0.01) after just 12 h and maintained significant ( p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.01) results after 24 h.

The season of calving was also found to have a highly significant effect on 305-dMY ( P < 0.01), and a significant effect on LP ( P < 0.05), although no significant effect was observed on CI and DO.

The differences in both axial and secondary root lengths between the treatment and control groups were highly significant ( p < 0.01).

For all traits and cycles, genotypic and genotype × location.tester (σ g×l 2 ) variance components were highly significant ( p < 0.01) and estimates of σ g×l 2 were always smaller than the genotypic variance component.

Remarkably, our finding that livin confers resistance to trastuzumab is strongly supported by clinical data that patients with livin-overexpressing tumors did not respond to trastuzumab as well as those with normal livin, and the difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.01), even in the small cohort.

There was a highly significant difference in the change in distribution of opinion (matched pair, 3 d.f., χ 2 =10.26, and P <0.01).

There was a highly significant difference between the groups ( P < 0.01).

The results revealed very strong correlations between TPC and TFC of WEMPs ( r = 0.942), as well as between FRAP and TPC ( r = 0.938), DPPH and TPC ( r = 0.799), ABTS and TPC ( r = 0.799), all of which were highly significant ( p < 0.01).

All tests were two-tailed, and the results were considered significant (*) when p < 0.05 and highly significant (**) when p < 0.01.

The T-value of beta regression coefficients of the predictor variable has been found to be highly significant ( p < 0.01).

Comparison of EPI Levels before and after Exercise in MICT, HIIT, and MICT+BFR Groups It was found that (1) there was no statistically significant difference in EPI levels among the groups before exercise ( p > 0.05); (2) compared with the pre-exercise EPI levels, the difference in blood EPI levels among the subjects in the MICT and MICT+BFR groups after exercise was significant ( p < 0.05), with increases of 8.3% and 18.1%, respectively; and (3) compared with the pre-exercise EPI levels, for the HIIT group, the difference in blood EPI levels in subjects after exercise was highly significant ( p < 0.01), with an increase of 30.4%, as shown in Table 1 .

In addition, there was a highly significant correlation between Enterococcus counts and turbidity ( P < 0.01). 3.1 Enterococcus confirmation and speciation Out of the 409 presumptive Enterococcus isolates recovered from the samples, 67 were confirmed to be Enterococcus at the genus level.

The difference between male and female students is highly significant ( P < 0.01), whereas this difference is not significant between government and private colleges. 43.06% of students feel being addicted to social media.

Inter-age comparison using ANOVA for females demonstrated a statistically highly significant difference from actual age in all age groups (P<0.01), with the highest mean in females aged 51-60 years and the lowest in females aged 31-40 years.

Compared to the control group (0 h), MDA exhibited a significant ( p < 0.05) and highly significant ( p < 0.01) increase at 6 h (1.299-fold) and 24 h (1.939-fold), respectively.

In the breast CASL subgroup, IL2RG, TSPAN1, and HOXD10 were similarly elevated to a highly significant degree ( p < 0.01, Supplementary Figure S1C ).

Differences were accepted as significant ( P < 0.05) and highly significant ( P < 0.01).

Subsequently, Pearson's correlation matrices were performed in each species to detect significant ( p < 0.05) and highly significant ( p < 0.01) correlations between all analysed parameters.

In each of the four families DH lines transgressed the respective parents for all three time points and consistently, we observed highly significant ( P < 0.01) genotypic variances ( σ G 2 ) and in addition genotype-by-environment interaction variances ( σ G × E 2 ) for developmental stage at all three time points (DS1–DS3) ( Table S1 ).

siderosticta under water stress Correlation analysis showed strong synergy among Chl a, Chl b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids, and all of these pigments exhibited highly significant positive correlations with the photosynthetic parameters A n , g s , and T r ( p ≤ 0.01) ( Figure 11a ).

The following thresholds were used for interpreting p -values: p ≤ 0.001 indicates very highly significant results (strong evidence); 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01, highly significant; 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, significant at the 95% confidence level; 0.05 < p ≤ 0.1, marginally significant (trend); and p > 0.1, not significant.

Statistical significance was determined as follows: ns, not significant ( p > 0.05); * , significant ( p < 0.05); ** , highly significant ( p < 0.01); *** , extremely significant ( p < 0.001).