“highly significant”

SIMPROF plot expressed interconnections and highly significant correlation (Pi = 0.813, p <0.01), signifying genuine relationship between the contaminants (Fig.

This association proved highly significant ( p <0.01) based on the five models analyzed, which suggests good model specification and robustness of the effects of ethnic-racial status on type of health insurance.

The mean difference between the weights of the placentae corresponding to the heaviest fetus and the weights of the placentae corresponding to the lightest fetus was +1.37 q- 0.128 gm., a highly significant value (t = 10.7, P < 0.01).

ANOVA showed highly significant effects ( P < 0.01) of genotypes, environments, and genotype × environment interactions on all traits ( Table 1 ) that were exhibited.

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the polynomial model was highly significant ( p < 0.01) and the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05).

The Relationship between Socioeconomic Factors and PM 2.5 in the Geographical Subareas From Figure 8 , a highly significant ( p < 0.01) positive correlation between socioeconomic factors and PM 2.5 was observed in North China, Northeast China and East China, indicating that GDPP, IVA, UPD and PCO played a vital role in North China, Northeast China and East China.

The chi-square test revealed a highly significant association between these two variables and the Wong–Baker scale ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively).

The correlation of FLSMY was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) and positive with FPY (0.573 ± 0.035) and FLL (0.131 ± 0.035).

The ANOVA results indicated that the regression model is highly significant, with a p -value of 0.0014 ( p < 0.01) and an F -value of 12.750.

After treatment with ZEA for 8 h, compared with the NC group, there was a highly significant decrease in EdU-positive cell incorporation in the ZEA group ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 1 A).

Overall, the investigation revealed highly significant ( p < 0.01) predictive relationships between BSPs estimated using convex hulls and BSPs calculated from soft tissue for every segment–parameter combination tested.

Statistical analyses revealed highly significant velocity differences between control (mock) and LatB or BDM treatments ( t -test, p <0.01, Figure 3G ).

Digestive Enzyme Activity As shown in Table 6 , supplementation of dietary RECC at varying inclusion levels had significant effects on the activities of AMS ( p < 0.05) and a highly significant influence on LPS and Trypsin ( p < 0.01).

Other QTL were also highly significant but only at the chromosome-wide level and affected AFP (GGA27, P < 0.01), ThP (GGA8, P < 0.01), and T b (GGA11, P < 0.01).

It was revealed that the HSP60-SiRNA-1087 cell line exhibited a highly significant decrease in the expression of HSP60 at both transcriptional and protein levels compared to the HSP60-SiRNA-NC group ( P < 0.01), with a 40% reduction in HSP60 expression.

In addition, genera Prevotella , Sneathia , Dialister , Anaerococcus , Peptoniphilus , Fenollaria , Actinomyces , and Mobiluncus showed a highly significant positive correlation for the ASV index of alpha diversity only ( p < 0.01).

However, a highly significant increase (P<0.01) in the PB levels was observed with the treatment of 40 mg/kg at the end of day 28 as compared to day 14 of PB treatment in PTZ kindled rats.

The repeatable SNPs which were detected in at least two environments were verified based on their polymorphism in the natural population, and the differences of phenotypic values of these SNPs reached highly significant levels in each environment ( p < 0.01) (Table 3 ).

However, the addition of PHE induced a highly significant lowering ( p < .01) of pH values ranging from 4.44 to 4.62 to 4.78 and 4.93 in mean recorded, respectively, for PHE concentrations of 0%, 2%, 4%, and 6%.

The differences between them and OVX group in the rate of dissolution as well as the amount of calcium released at 24 hours were highly significant (P < 0.01).

We focused on the modules satisfying the highly significant correlation ( p < 0.01) between GS and MM, together with a significant correlation ( p < 0.01) with a specific differentiation stage.

A highly significant difference (P-value <0.01) is observed in the blood sugar indices (FBG, PPBG, HbA1c) when compared between the study groups.

Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 and highly significant differences at p < 0.01.

This analysis yielded highly significant main effects of “stimulus category” ( F (1.19,115.21) = 288.49, P < .01, η 2 = .75) and “attachment to stimulus” ( F (1,97) = 1291.45, P < .01, η 2 = .93) as well as a significant interaction of “treatment” and “AQ” ( F (1,97) = 10.85, P < .01, η 2 = .10).

A 1.5-fold change expression cutoff for ratio experiments was applied together with anticorrelation of ratio profiles, rendering the microarray analysis highly significant ( P < .01), robust, and reproducible.