“highly significant”

The OR of 2.57 was recorded in cases smoking beedis/cigarettes 1–10/day and was statistically significant ( p = 0.004) whereas OR was 12.26 in cases who smoked cigarettes/beedis 11–20/day and was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Results An increased amount of bone was measured from the crest to the apical portion of the dentate sites on the buccal and lingual sides of both jaws with a highly significant difference detected among all the tested points ( P < 0.0001).

Spearman’s correlations between the two dietary assessment instruments were moderate and highly significant for fruit ( r = 0.5123, P = 0.0001), fat ( r = 0.4326, P = 0.0010) and sugar ( r = 0.4079, P = 0.0020); while the vegetable measurement was more variable ( r = 0.3983, P = 0.0026).

Including the “both” category in the analysis and considering the variables as ordered (surgeons>both>physicians), the association with all three outcomes is highly significant (extended Cochran-Armitage test): recommending VCUG: P <0.0001, recommending continuous antibiotic prophylaxis: P <0.001, recommending surgery: P =0.003.

A highly significant, positive correlation ( r 2 = 0.27, P < 0.0001), confirmed that the expression of Potri.001G329000 impacts vessel dimension ( Fig. 1 E ).

Analysis using a reduced quadratic model showed that the model was highly significant, with an F-value of 17.86 ( p < 0.0001).

This was confirmed by a hierarchic (nested) analysis of variance (ANOVA), which showed highly significant among-cell (subgroup) variability regardless of the parameter tested (P < 0.0001, peak amplitude, risetime, halfwidth, and foot duration were tested after logarithmic transformation, cubic-root of the charge was tested without transformation).

For RR, the difference between “combined actions including the power grasp” is highly significant when compared with “single actions” ( p = 0.0001, d = 1.5802) as well as when compared with “combined actions without the power grasp” ( p = 0.0039, d = 1.5178) after the Holm–Bonferroni correction.

The same trend was observed on the fifth day with a very highly significant difference (df = 27; F = 12.67; p < 0.0001) observed between the treatments.

Statistical Analysis and Variability One-way ANOVA on ln-transformed C_max and AUC_0-t confirmed highly significant differences among the four formulations for C_max: F (3,20) = 96.34, p < 0.0001; for ln AUC_0-t: F(3,20) = 84.12, p < 0.0001.

This difference is highly significant ( t = −4.41, p < 0.0001) and depends on the fact that differences between motor patterns resulted very salient, whereas it was more difficult to distinguish hand postures.

Our IPO reconstruction exhibits highly significant agreement with instrumental IPO data from 1880 onward ( r = 0.85, P ≤ 0.0001; 1880 to 1995).

For all three emotions, the effect was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Regression analyses (not shown) demonstrated a highly significant association between numbers of breakpoints vs. chromosome length ( p < 0.0001) and numbers of breakpoints vs. gene content ( p = 0.0001) at univariable analyses.

There was a highly significant increase in the incidence of secretor status in O blood group individuals when compared with A, B, and AB blood group individuals separately ( P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P = 0.0003, respectively) and collectively ( P < 0.0001).

Adjusted means showed the same stepwise increase (77.1, 85.4, and 89.4 fL, respectively), with all pairwise contrasts being highly significant (p ≤ 0.0001).

brevis CD2 treatment resulted in a highly significant reduction in BoP score compared to baseline ( p < 0.0001 ).

Highly significant reduction in inflammation in the BBS group compared to the AS group (P < 0.0001).

On the 21st day after vaccination, an increase in the mean antibody titers, ranging from 2.44 ± 0.20 to 4.05 ± 0.32 log 2 , was recorded in the animals of all experimental groups; the overall effect was highly significant among the groups (ANOVA, p < 0.0001).

The reduction in AF burden was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) ( Table 2 ).

There was a highly significant interaction between mulch and the amaranth varieties in 2017 (F = 7.24, df = 8, 32; p < 0.0001) as well as in 2018 (F = 7.44, df = 8, 32; p < 0.0001).

This was a highly significant association ( P < 0.0001).

The pattern of distribution for NM and M trials is almost mirror reversed, and consequently there is a highly significant difference when comparing the amount of original and reversed position trials for NM and M trials (χ 2 1 = 126.0, p<.0001, φ = .75).

The analysis and comparison of the results of OSCG with controls showed a highly significant difference, with an OR of 16.43 (CI: 5.10-52.94), p <0.0001 ( Table 2 ). - DNA-HPV at multiple sites: 67% of the HPV+ patients of OSCG had two or more positive samples.

Statistical analysis confirmed that this reduction is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating a pronounced structural distinction between both fiber populations.