“highly significant”

The colocalization of LAMP3 and EEA1 was calculated using the colocalization threshold plugin in the ImageJ program, and the correlation of the colocalization between LAMP3 and EEA1 was found to be highly significant ( R 2 = 0.96; P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5B ).

The results show that the overall model is highly significant ( F = 50.82, P < 0.0001), which means that the factors considered in the model are important for the adsorption process.

Differences in high-sensitive Troponin T (hsTnT) and N-terminal-pro hormone brain natriuretic peptides (NTproBNP) levels were found to be highly significant between patient groups ( p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant linear trend across quartiles of PHPT-GRS scores (chi-square for linear trend extended Mantel-Haenszel test = 98.9; P < 1.0e-04) as shown in Fig. 2 .

The difference in age structure among the groups as reported by the authors in their Table 1 is, in fact, highly significant ( χ 2 =374.6; P <0.0001).

The result obtained in the Friedman test was highly significant and showed a p value < 0.0001, highlighting relevant differences between the compared matrices.

Univariate F test analysis showed that differences between the two groups, at each half-cycle, were all highly significant (p < 0.0001 for the first 5 half-cycles; p < 0.01 for the last half-cycle).

The model for CCI was highly significant (F 3,157 = 42.837, p < 0.0001) and explained 45.5% of the variance ( R 2 = 0.455; R 2 adj = 0.444).

In this case, the determined regression equation was also highly significant, as were its coefficients ( p ≤ 0.0001).

These data revealed that, compared to the knockdown of integrin α6β4 or p53 alone, the effect of knockdown of both mutant p53 and integrin β4 ( Figure 1H ) on cell viability in response to cisplatin is additive ( Figure 1G ; p = 0.03) and highly significant (p < 0.0001 vs control at 1μM and 2.5μM).

Most of the associations among all HCs were characterized by highly significant p -values and adjusted p -values ( p ≤ 0.0001).

However, the existence of various Enterobacterales among each animal and human sources showed highly significant variations ( P = 0.0001).

The explanatory variable “reproductive strategy” was also highly significant (PERMANOVA: p = .0001, df = 1, R 2 = .23, F = 48.37), revealing differences between pelvic and transfer brooding individuals (Figure 2 and Table S4 ).

IL-8 was found to be highly significant across all the three infected groups with p < 0.0001 with HCV at the highest significance range.

A highly significant variation ( p < 0.0001 ) was observed for the genotype, environment, and G × E interaction in all the studied traits.

Analysis of response surface and contour plots For all types of oil yields, the single factor particle size (i.e., 150–355 μm) was shown to be statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

oswaldi molar dimensions and absolute geological age is tight and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) across radiometrically dated sites, with geological age explaining more than 83% of the overall variance in molar area ( Fig. 3 and SI Appendix , Table S1 ).

In lung adenocarcinoma, the most predictive signature generated from the Kim and colleagues ( 38 ) dataset revealed no association with survival when derived from ldvae [ P = 0.25 or −log 10 ( P ) = 0.6], whereas the BBKNN signature showed a highly significant predictive capacity [ P = 1e−4 or −log 10 ( P ) = 4; Fig. 5B ].

All four parameters reflected a highly significant differencebetween the newest and older regions (P < .0001).

Differences were considered to be significant at different p -values: p > 0.05 was considered non-significant, p < 0.05 (*) significant, p < 0.01 (**) very significant, p < 0.001 (***) highly significant, and p < 0.0001 (****) extremely significant. 3.

Together with detection of a highly significant ( P < 0.0001, by unweighted UniFrac) difference in beta-diversity distance in the TWK10-hk group after administration relative to the TWK10 group, these findings indicate that six-week administration of heat-killed TWK10 has a stronger effect in rearranging microbial community structures than viable TWK10 ( Figure 3 B,C).

It confirmed that the selected models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with high R 2 values (>0.9157), as well as confirming that only the statistically significant effects and the terms supporting the hierarchy were included in the models.

Generally, P > 0.05 was considered statistically insignificant (ns), P < 0.01 was considered significant (**), P < 0.001 was considered highly significant (***), and P < 0.0001 was considered very highly significant (****).

Pilot studies indicated a lack of need for higher BSO concentrations to achieve highly significant ( p < 0.0001) increases in ROS levels.

The main effect of ROI combinations (BOLD activations within MTL, VS, and MTL + VS sets) was highly significant (F = 46.8, P < 0.0001): for the outside-session recognition condition ( Fig. 3 B ), the 25 visual ROIs and the 5 MTL ROIs in combination showed the best mean balanced accuracy at 59.6%.