“highly significant”

sustained response types between IC ipsi and IC contra in tinnitus GPs was highly significant [χ 2 (1) = 46.42, P < 0.0001].

Shape ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of genotype on ventricular shape (procrustes ANOVA: F = 9.29, p = 0.0001) and a significant induction × genotype interaction ( F = 2.45, p = 0.0157), indicating that the impact of PKN2 loss on heart shape depends on when the knockout was induced.

Adding more biological replicates to the qPCR log 2 FC calculation decreased the correlation with the microarray log 2 FCs [ Supplementary Figure S2 (‘all samples’ linear regression model); r 2 = 0.703], but the linear regression model remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Data analyzed revealed that there was a significant effect of the forward speeds (FS) (p < 0.05), a highly significant effect for elevator velocities (ES) (p < 0.0001), and a highly significant effect for cutting knives speeds “CKS” (p < 0.01) on the collecting efficiency.

The CytOx kinetics measured with 1.128 mg/mL mitochondria showed that the differences between control and ADP, control and ATP, and ADP and ATP +RS ( Figure 3 A) were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.0001) according to a regular two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni Post hoc analysis.

Tiger caregivers in private facilities all had direct contact with the young tigers provided for the tourists, whereas none of the caregivers in government facilities had direct contact with tigers: a highly significant difference despite the small number of tiger caregivers ( p < 0.0001).

A strong and highly significant correlation was observed between plasma and PBMC-expressed SDC3 levels ( r = 0.921; p < 0.0001).

The results indicated that there was a highly significant association between PD-L2 and PD-L1 in these tumors ( p < 0.0001) [ 107 ].

Both parametric and non-parametric statistical tests confirmed these findings were highly significant ( t -test and Mann-Whitney U , P < 0.0001), and the effect size was moderate, demonstrating genuine operational impact ( Table 2 ).

As expected, lower vitamin D metabolites (1,25(OH)D and 25(OH)D) and higher PTH levels were observed, but a pronounced and highly significant increase in urinary BPA levels was noted in the vitamin D-deficient group (527.9 ± 1289.5 ng/dL vs 86.9 ± 116.8 ng/dL, P < 0.0001).

The difference in response after booster dose between the undetectable and low Ab group was highly significant (42% vs. 87%, p=0.0001).

For all parameters in the Friedrichs criteria in both active and placebo group, the p -value from screening to weeks 1, 2 and 4 was highly significant ( p value ≤ 0001).

Among all the sites where a positive drug–diet interaction was found, the CeA was most highly significant (* p < 0.0001).

Regarding retention scores, a highly significant treatment effect was found (H [3] = 21.24, p<0.0001).

Highly significant decreases in an age-dependent manner were observed in the concentrations of T3 and T4 ( p = 0.0001, both). 3.4.

Statistical analyses were performed with Student’s t-test, with p -value reported as * p < 0.05 considered statistically significant, ** p < 0.01 considered highly significant and *** p < 0.0001 very highly significant.

The ANOVA results suggested that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

As shown in Table 4 , all three predictors (entropy, density-TC, density-TN) are highly significant ( p <0.0001, after alpha correction because of multi-comparisons) when modeling the concreteness of a noun.

Patients with MDE had a 26% greater MAO-B V T in the prefrontal cortex, a highly significant finding ( P = 0.0001) ( Moriguchi et al., 2019 ; see Figure 4A ).

During the breathing exercises, there was a highly significant initial difference in heart rate response between hyperventilation and diaphragmatic breathing (p<0.0001).

These differences were highly significant ( P < 0.0001, Figure 2C ).

Despite the higher rate of positivity (20%) that was found with Flow-SuperRCA, a highly significant correlation was observed between the KIT p.D816V VAF obtained with both methods (Rρ = 0.92; P < .0001; Figure 1 C).

Correlation Between Genomic Homozygosity and Re The correlation between Re and the whole genomic homozygosity estimate (FROH) was negative and highly significant (ρ = −0.147, P < 0.0001, Figure 3 ).

Once again, students from UiO reported the lowest levels of agreement, while differences between institutions were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3D ).

Mahalanobis distances obtained by pairwise comparisons of all three genera revealed highly significant differences (permutation 10,000 rounds in MorphoJ: P < 0.0001), ranging from 4.9309 ( Lucilia and Hemipyrellia) to 11.3103 ( Chrysomya and Hemipyrellia) (Table 2 ).