“highly significant”

Unlike the age of farmers across regions, there was a highly significant difference in age between men and women ( P < 0.0001).

WS was highly significant by ”eyeballing” as well as by DIA with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.55 and 0.62 (p<0.0001), respectively.

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that patients of the high-risk score group had highly significant shorter OS rates than those in the low-risk score group ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4 B).

Of the 80 SNPs, two were identified exhibiting highly significant LD ( p < 0.0001; D’ > 0.95, r 2 > 0.85) with rs35286811 (i.e., rs72798738 and rs11678584 ( Table 4 , Figure A1 )), and for each of these, as for rs35286811, the minor allele was the risk allele.

In all cases, the antioxidant formulation (samples I, II, and III) had a highly significant effect ( p -value < 0.0001, see Supplementary Materials Tables S1 and S2 ).

Once again, Gnetin C exhibited the most profound effects in both cell lines and highly significant inhibition of cell migration ( p < 0.0001) compared to Res and Pter ( Figure 3 C,D). 3.3.

Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparisons test and statistical analyzes ( Tables S3 and S4 ) showed highly significant PHB quantity when comparing all treatments ( p < 0.0001), except for acetate and bicarbonate treatments ( p > 0.99) and acetate plus bicarbonate compared to no nitrate plus acetate ( p = 0.76).

ANOVA ( Table 4 ) revealed that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

AMOVA that was conducted by grouping the accessions according to their geographic regions of origin and without grouping revealed a highly significant variation among accessions and regions as well as within accessions ( Table 2 ; P < 0.0001).

Furthermore, the change-sensitivity has been rated as highly significant ( p < 0.0001) (Wolf et al., 2009 ).

One-way ANOVA ( Tables S1 and S3 ) further indicated that the overall model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with experimental data closely fitting the predictive model.

Being a full sibling to an adoptee who died with infection increased the mortality rate with infection to a highly significant HR of (9.36; 2.94–29.8, p = 0.0001), whereas HRs among half siblings were not statistically different from one.

In this model, the effect of time post alloHSCT on hemoglobin levels was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.259).

Multivariate modelling of global health status (EORTC QLQ C30) at 2 years indicated baseline quality of life as a highly significant factor (p < 0.0001).

The analysis revealed that TSV induced less than 5% toxicity at 0.05 μg/mL, while toxicity exceeded 98% at 100 μg/mL, with a highly significant increase in toxicity across concentrations ( p < 0.0001).

Results Axial length Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant interaction between the type of defocus and time of measurement for axial length measures across the six defocus conditions (F (20,300) = 4.60, p < 0.0001).

Nevertheless, there was a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001) observed between the grade representing combined Discovery deliverables and the final course grade (Fig. 2a ).

We found a moderate and highly significant ( p < 0.0001) correlation between the frequency of MAITs expressing CD69 and the frequency of NK cells, CD4 + T cells and CD8 + T cells expressing CD69 across all the samples (Spearman r = 0.697 for CD69 + NK cells, r = 0.508 for CD69 + CD4 + T cells, r = 0.649 for CD69 + CD8 + T cells, Fig. 5 a).

Sample positivity increased with neighborhood deprivation, and this trend was highly significant across all periods considered ( p < 0.0001 across all years and for each two-year interval except for 2021–2022, which had p = 0.024; Fig. 3 ).

The difference in DOC between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups was highly significant prior to DOC matching (Student’s t , p < 0.0001).

The omnibus tests of model coefficients for the binary logistic regression were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Both F ST (0.172) and Φ PT (0.254) statistics revealed the presence of highly significant genetic differences among sites (P <0.0001 and P <0.001 respectively) ( Table 2 ); as expected, Φ PT values exceeded those of F ST .

Cox regression detected a highly significant constant temperature effect on post-storage germination (Wald χ 2 = 36.69, p < 0.0001).

Highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001) could be determined between three sampling time points: preoperative, postoperative after clinical improvement and after six months and in comparison to the healthy control group (animal experiment number: 33.8‐42 502‐05‐18A290).

A one-way ANOVA demonstrated a highly significant difference in ALP levels across the four clinical severity grades (F = 399.79, p < 0.0001) (Table 1 ).