“highly significant”

The ANOVA results indicate that the fitted quadratic model is highly significant, with a model F‐value of 55.56 and a p value < 0.0001, which implies that the model is highly suitable for describing the relationship between the independent variables and the TPC yield.

In order to evaluate the diagnostic value of BLSP in terms of tissue-specificity, we compared this integrated group to all UC cases and observed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) difference for all CpGs ( Table S5 ).

ANOVA showed the existence of highly significant differences between groups (p < 0.0001).

Comparison of gingival scores Result obtained from repeated measure of ANOVA showed a highly significant decrease (F=11.981; P <0.0001) in mean gingival score from baseline to 8 th week in all the groups.

An analysis of variance, with sense of closeness as the dependent variable and all nine variables as factors, was highly significant (F 11,17 = 25.89, p < 0.0001).

The effects of the study drugs on gut microbiome β-diversity at the OTU level were first tested statistically using a two-way NPMANOVA and the results revealed highly significant main effects for drug (F 4,65 = 3.35; p = 0.0001) and time (F 2,65 = 8.43, p = 0.0001), as well as a significant interaction (F 8,65 = 1.77, p = 0.0001).

The results suggest that the change of extraction temperature had highly significant effects on the yield of polyphenols ( p < 0.0001) from the bamboo shoots of Phyllostachys pubescens under microwave irradiation.

The regression of the distance between F ST and geographic distance in km was highly significant for all population comparisons (males collected in early summer, R 2 = 0.51, p < 0.0001; females collected in early summer, R 2 = 0.60, p < 0.0001; males collected in late summer R 2 = 0.71, p < 0.0001; females collected in late summer R 2 = 0.65, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2 a-d).

Although absolute concentrations varied between the ELISA and ECL, the correlation coefficient for CSF A β 42 was r = 0.819 and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) ( Figure 1(b) ). 4.

The difference between the TRAP-N/CSP-RT (comb) (10/10) and TRAP-N/CSP-T (comb) (0/10) groups was highly significant (p<0.0001, Fisher’s exact test).

Heterogeneity on the full dataset was highly significant by the Cochran test ( Q = 29822.77, df = 975, p < 0.0001).

The shorter survival time of animals with Ahr -deficient GCPs was highly significant (p < 0.0001, log-rank test).

Finally, with respect to oviposition, fruit foraging and mating, differences between peaches and Uchuvas were highly significant (Mann–Whitney test: Z = 3.80, p = 0.0001 in all cases).

All of the interactions are highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

However, in direct sunlight the background correction applied ceases to function and two-way ANOVA and post-hoc multiple comparisons were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for background illumination and direct sunlight, respectively ( Table 5 ).

Linear regression analysis of the exponential growth phases also revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) between slopes of regression lines. 6.7.

Our results are accordance with Jampoka et al., 36 who reported a highly significant increase in the serum levels of mi-RNA-122 in NAFLD patients compared to the control group. 36 For mi-RNA-122, the AUC was 0.831 ( p < 0.0001) with 75.0% sensitivity and 82.35% specificity.

There was a moderate but highly significant positive correlation between lifetime psychedelic use and nature relatedness at baseline (r = 0.306, p < 0.0001, Figure 1 ), reflected by the mean nature relatedness values ranging from M = 3.52 (SD = 1.03) for psychedelic-naïve participants to M = 4.45 (SD = 0.55) in individuals who indicated more than 100 occasions of psychedelic use.

Other covariates such as age, educational level, working status, participation in social activities, perceived health status, regular physical activities, and weight change of ≥5kg in the past year were also highly significant for both men and women ( p < 0.0001).

The mean difference was statistically highly significant (P < 0.0001 ** ) on applying Mann–Whitney U test.

Staphylococcus aureus also demonstrated a highly significant increasing trend ( p = 0.0001), accumulating 4854 total isolates, with a mean of 971 isolates per year.

TNFR1 expression significantly increased in all HIFU-treated Hep3B cells at both 24 and 72 h ( p < 0.0001) as compared to control, and there was also a highly significant difference in the expression between standalone HIFU and ethanol + HIFU treatment groups ( p < 0.0001).

These differences were highly significant by applying generalized linear model ( p < .0001).

In hamsters immunized SQ, body weight plateaued on day 3 such that by day 7, the difference in weight loss between this group and unvaccinated hamsters was also highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

There was no significant change in the expression of pMx-MGT Ang II cells (676.3 ± 421.3 pixels/cell; Figure 4 C,F) and pMx-MGT ET-1 cells (675.5 ± 409.1 pixels/cell; Figure 4 D,F), but a highly significant upregulation of MCP-1 was measured in the Isl1 + Sca1 + ckit + pCPCs stimulated with Ang II (1541.0 ± 880.9 pixels/cell, p = 0.0001; Figure 4 E,F). 3.4.