“highly significant”

This visual suggestion of publication bias was strongly corroborated by statistical testing, as Egger’s regression test was highly significant (z = 5.597, p = 0.000).

The difference between the groups was analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey tests for multiple comparisons for normal parameters of PI, GI, PPD, CAL, HbA1c, and Kruskal Wallis test for the non-normal parameter, i.e., BMD, in all the study groups ( Table 2 ). Periodontal parameters, such as PI, GI, PPD, CAL, and HbA1c, were highly significant P = 0.000, suggesting diabetes as a risk factor in chronic periodontitis patients or indicating chronic periodontitis as a risk factor in T2DM patients.

All differences were highly significant with p = 0 to machine precision.

This notion is in agreement with our data, where the regression analysis demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation between the galactose content and anti-cancer activity (R 2 = 0.58, p = 0.000 for B16F10 cell adhesion; R 2 = 0.95, p = 0.000 for anchorage-independent growth of HT-29 cells).

More males (65.3%) agreed or strongly agreed with the statement ‘Work as a neurosurgery specialist can impede family life as compared to females (57.5%), which was highly significant ( p = 0.000).

In the same way, the median IQR of D-dimer was highly significant in the critical group [3750 (2522–5827)] when compared with severe 3100 (1500–5031) and non-severe groups [2050 (780–3100)] (P = 0.000) Table 5 .

All correlations are highly significant (all P <0.000).

Post-Evr administration resulted in a highly significant decrease (27%, P = 0.00) in the mean levels ( Table 3 ).

These compositional correlations are, in all cases, positive and highly significant ( p -values ≈ 0).

In brief, the P -values for breathlessness ( P = .014; significant), eye disease ( P = .050; significant at the .05 threshold), asthma ( P = .000; highly substantial), and pneumonia ( P = .000; highly significant) are all below .05, indicating that for these health outcomes, the duration of exposure to smoke significantly affects the health outcome (based on the self-reported data).

Similarly, a highly significant (p=0.00) association was found between community self-efforts and practices for control.

Within this model, highly significant predictors were both the independent continuous (dpi: F (1, 299) = 19.267, p = 0.000) and categorical (treatment: F (5, 299) = 62.880, p = 0.000) variable.

The results of analysis prompted to check also the difference in local control between patients with 1-3 and more metastases which was also highly significant (p = 0.0000), with median LPFS of 7.1 and 17.1 months, respectively.

A chi-squared test revealed a highly significant association between the grade of the cleft (1–4) and the age at diagnosis (≤30 days (early)/>30 days (late); p = .000); as the severity of the CP increased, the chances of early diagnosis also increased.

In Week 1, chicks in Groups C (780 g) and D (785 g) consumed significantly more feed compared to Groups A and B (both 660 g), with a highly significant difference ( p = 0.00).

A highly significant association was observed between prevalence of IPI and low CD4 + T cell count ( p = 0.000).

Furthermore, the complete model, including all predictors, was highly significant (Prob >2 (DF = 13), p = 0.000).

The time taken for complete sensory recovery in Group D 5 -319.83 ± 61.41, Group D 10 -336.13 ± 61.38, and Group D 15 -415.20 ± 96.6, which is statistically highly significant ( P = 0.000).

The neurological recovery was highly significant ( p =0.000 using chi-square test with Yates' correction).

There was a highly significant relationship between pleural fluid, TTF-1, and lung adenocarcinoma (p=0.000).

The direct effect is highly significant ( P = 0.000, t = 13.13).

For testing the hypothesis, paired t-test was used and findings showed that the highly significant ( P = 0.000) difference was observed between the pre-test and post-test level of knowledge.

II), genotype, and epithelial zone yielded a highly significant difference for HC type ( F (1,46) = 1348.33, P = 0), but for no other comparison.

There were highly significant differences in compactness among the four substrates (F 3, 36 = 57.849, P = 0.000).

This effect was further shown to be highly significant for each individual marker by reaching Bonferroni corrected significance ( Fig 3 ; univariate F-tests, p < 0.000).