“highly significant”

The R-squared of 0.42 indicates that 42% of the variance in spa types is explained by the sample’s membership in either the meat or human category and that the differences observed when communities of stores and households are sorted on this factor is highly significant (p = 0.000).

MANOVA showed a highly significant main effect of species on the concentration of metal elements in lichen thallus (Wilk’s lambda = 0.715; p = 0.000) (Table 1 ).

The data also show a substantial number in mean and SD values of PTSD (23.4 ± 5.25), depression (2.2 ± 1.2), anxiety(4.3 ± 1.4), and stress (9.2 ± 2.27) during lockdown situations with highly significant p values ( p = .00), marking the impact of COVID-19 on HCWs ( Table 3 ).

ANOVA revealed highly significant CN variation among the taxa ( F = 44.649, d.f. = 5, p = 0.0000).

Conventional DWI analysis Malignant lesions demonstrated significantly lower ADC values compared to benign lesions, with a highly significant P = 0.000 ( Figure 1 and Table 2 ).

Girls (n = 215) had a BF% of 13.1%, while boys (n = 190) averaged at 11.5%; the difference being statistically highly significant (t = 4.1585. p<.0000).

These differences were statistically highly significant ( p = 0.000; rho = 0.549).

There is a highly significant difference between women and men (p < 000). 80 events (41,67%) had no female representation, whereas events without male representation were in the minority (5,21%).

The association between side effects and adherence showed a highly significant relationship ( P value = 0.000).

Such difference in variability resulted highly significant from a 2-way ANOVA test (conditions × DoFs) revealing a main effect of condition ( F 1,144 = 36.785, p < 0, 001) independently from the three DoFs that resulted to have the same trend of higher precision (lower variability ) in the cSP condition.

Primary outcome Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) SIA was “ with the rule ” of a magnitude 1.77 ± 0.8 vs 2.42 ± 0.83 at 1 week in study vs control group, the difference being highly significant ( P < 0.00, using Mann-Whitney U test).

The severe depression grades had higher plaque and gingival indices, and the mean C-reactive protein concentration was higher in the severe depression grade, with a highly significant difference (P =0.000).

There is a statistically significant association between performing BSE in the correct way and discovering BC, with a highly significant p value of 0.000 as indicated by the Pearson's chi‐square test ( p = 0.000) (Table 5 ).

The correlation was found to be highly significant (p=0.000) between radiologist and surgeon according to Paderson’s scale before surgical removal of impacted third molars.

Furthermore, statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference in HBZ gene expression among the study population (CI 95%- p = 0.000).

A highly significant correlation between pruritus and day temperature was observed (ρ = −0.14, p = .000), and itch was generally worse during winter ( p = .000).

Highly significant interactions between main effects of time and ɛ 4 allele were noted for all cognitive measures: MMSE ( ɛ 3/ ɛ 3 versus ɛ 3/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000; ɛ 3/ ɛ 3 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000), CDR-SB ( ɛ 3/ ɛ 3 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000; ɛ 3/ ɛ 4 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000), ADAS-11 ( ɛ 3/ ɛ 3 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000; ɛ 3/ ɛ 4 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000), and MoCA ( ɛ 3/ ɛ 3 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000; ɛ 3/ ɛ 4 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000).

The values of salivary pH and salivary buffering capacity showed good correlation in both the type 2 diabetics and the control group, as the salivary pH decreased the salivary buffering capacity also decreased and the relationship was highly significant statistically ( P = 0.000) [ Table 2 ].

The correlation between minimum temperature and malaria disease prevalence is highly significant (r = 0.4586 p = 0.0).

We find in all cases a positive and highly significant Spearman’s rank correlation (INT3_400: 5′ rho = 0.439, P = 0; 3′ rho = 0.123, P = 2.7 × 10 − 31 ; INT3: 5′ rho = 0.070, P = 2.5 × 10 − 13 ; 3′ rho = 0.646, P = 0).

**, highly significant ( P < 0.0l).

In Week 1, chicks in Groups C (780 g) and D (785 g) consumed significantly more feed compared to Groups A and B (both 660 g), with a highly significant difference ( p = 0.00).

The difference between the groups was analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey tests for multiple comparisons for normal parameters of PI, GI, PPD, CAL, HbA1c, and Kruskal Wallis test for the non-normal parameter, i.e., BMD, in all the study groups ( Table 2 ). Periodontal parameters, such as PI, GI, PPD, CAL, and HbA1c, were highly significant P = 0.000, suggesting diabetes as a risk factor in chronic periodontitis patients or indicating chronic periodontitis as a risk factor in T2DM patients.

Furthermore, a contingency table shows a highly significant association (Chi square = 597.170, P = 0.000000) between haplotype and country ( Table 3 ).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) ( Table 3 ) showed that the treatment was a very highly significant source of variation ( p = 0.00) of all the tested variables.