“highly significant”

The correlation between the five categories was highly significant for pain relief (P <0.0001), though not significant for reduced dysfunction.

Tests of equality of group means showed that the increase in the number of CD8+ cells and IFN-γ expression levels in irradiated tumors were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and that either measure was 100% accurate in predicting treatment response.

The results show highly significant (P<0.0001) inputs on the outputs as the delta-PSI, MR, and the SN values according to the statistical significance (P, 2 tail) analysis, as seen before in the sensitivity analysis.

When all samples were divided into IDH1 gene mutated ( IDH1mut , n = 18) and IDH1 wild-type ( IDH1wt , n = 78) gliomas, we observed a tendency of lower expression of CASC2 in IDH1wt ( p = 0.053) and highly significant relationship between higher miR-21 expression and IDH1wt gliomas ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 A,B). 2.3.

control highly significant (e.g. in whole length, 32.0 vs . 59.9 mm; p < 0.0001), but were also significant between the two inoculation sets (N1 vs .

Statistical analysis using Student’s t-test showed highly significant differences in potency (EC 50 ) between taurine, GABA and HT with p -values: GABA vs. taurine p = 0.0001, GABA vs.

Comparison with the full data set of 180 outbreaks reveals a highly significant reduction in goodness-of-fit ( P <0.0001), indicating that the 1967–1968 outbreak was unusually large given prior estimates for R .

A second supportive multivariable analysis used baseline count as a covariate and in that analysis, the baseline term was not significant ( P = 0.627), treatment was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), but study site was not statistically significant ( P = 0.219).

Statistical analysis using a paired Student's t‐test revealed a highly significant enhancement in fluorescence intensity after shrinkage (p < 0.0001; Figure 6C ).

Importantly, modulus at each scale was muscle dependent as evidenced by the highly significant muscle × scale interaction term ( p < 0.0001).

In total, about a two-fold increase in seeds was observed in reduced tillage plots (7936 seeds m −2 ) compared to ploughing (3846 seeds m −2 ) in the 0–20 cm topsoil layer, which was highly significant (ANOVA, F-value 24.5, p < 0.0001).

However, in the animals exposed at 115 dB SPL, the increases in ASR amplitude were highly significant at all stimulus levels from 105–120 dB SPL ( Fig. 4D ) (F 3,80 = 38.57, P<0.0001) and followed an initial period when startle responses were decreased below control levels ( Fig. 4C ).

Subsequently, ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curves were drawn with all those selected parameters that showed highly significant difference ( P =0.0001) between the two groups (overlap-ILD and unmixed ILD.

It was found to remain in the center in 35 patients in whom the grooved laryngoscope blade was used as compared to only 10 patients in group G ( P < 0.0001, which is very highly significant).

The survivability was highly significant in the medium supplemented with Zn ( p < 0.0001) and Ag ( p < 0.018).

The results showed a highly significant reduction in the levels of total vitamin D ( P < 0.0001), VDR ( P < 0.0001), vitamin D 3 ( P < 0.05), and calcium ( P < 0.0001) in the serum of CRC patients compared to the controls.

The differences among major gene pools were highly significant among diploid (F 5,96 = 212, p <0.0001) and marginally significant among tetraploid (F 1,39 = 4.8, p = 0.03) accessions.

wheat landraces Ethiopian tetraploid wheat association analysis yellow rust resistance 90 K wheat SNP array Highly significant differences were observed among accessions and accessions by environments ( P < 0.0001) in ANOVA analyses for stripe rust response in the field tests, but no significant difference was detected among environments.

The difference in DOC between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups was highly significant prior to DOC matching (Student’s t , p < 0.0001).

The interaction of intervention group and time point was highly significant in a two-way mixed ANOVA model (F(2, 28) = 13.38, p < 0.0001), with significant simple main effects for both intervention group (p = 0.026) and time (p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5 c).

A highly significant correlation of cytoplasmic survivin staining was observed with higher Gleason Scores and advanced pT stages (p < 0.0001 each, Table 1 ).

The omnibus tests of model coefficients for the binary logistic regression were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

A mixed model with pulse shape (Rec, rampUP, rampDOWN, rampLONG) and polarity (anodic or cathodic-first) as fixed factors and mouse as a random factor showed a highly significant effect of pulse shape (n = 12, P < 0.0001) and of polarity (P = 0.0011) on the threshold.

Transition-type was highly significant [ F (3, 27) = 130.5, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.35], and SOA was also highly significant [ F (3, 27) = 93.046, p < 0.0001, ε = 0.586, η 2 = 0.12].

As shown in Table 1 , the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the response surface quadratic model indicated that the regression model obtained was highly significant (P < 0.0001) with an F value of 263.99.