Barely Significant
← all phrases

highly significant

82,237 sentences · 82,237 papers · 156,979 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 1.5 × 10 -590.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These ROS-responsive genes overlapped with 207 ++Fe-induced and 10 ++Fe-suppressed genes, and the degree of overlap between ROS-responsive and ++Fe-inducible genes was highly significant ( P = 1.5 × 10 -59 by Fisher’s exact test), confirming that excess Fe causes oxidative stress in leaves ( Figure 6E ).
highly significantp = 8.21 e − 580.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For faces, the comparison between w -based and VGGFace-1-based encoders shows no significant difference (2-Sample T-Test; t (1918) = −0.2859, p = 0.78) but we found highly significant differences when comparing w -based encoders with VGGFace-3 (2-Sample T-Test; t (1918) = 16.5817, p = 8.21 e − 58) and with VGGFace-5 (2-Sample T-Test; t (1918) = 15.0820, p = 1.17 e − 48).
highly significantP = 4 × 10 –560.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This difference in the number of place fields was highly significant across the recorded population of CA1 and CA3 neurons (Fig. 2a , bottom; Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P = 4 × 10 –56 )—in each of the three different large-scale tunnels (see the individual bats and tunnels in Fig. 2a , top, and Extended Data Fig. 3a ).
highly significantP < 10 −550.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Functional analyses pinpoint shared and distinct biological processes that protect yeast cells from Al, Ga, and In toxicity We noted that there was a highly significant overlap between the gene-sets conferring resistance to the three metals tested (Fig. 3 A): the overlap was 26% (62 of 242 genes) between Al and Ga ( P < 10 −55 ), 25% (77 of 304 genes) between Ga and In ( P < 10 −64 ), and 34% (107 of 312 genes) between Al and In ( P < 10 −97 ).
highly significantp = 2.6×10−550.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When we compared these data to the breakpoint homology from 16,783 CNV breakpoints assembled for the 1,000 Genomes Pilot 1 study using identical methods, we find a highly significant difference from either the BWA-SW analysis (χ 2 = 244.6, 1 d.f., p = 2.6×10−55) or the EMBOSS method (χ 2 = 201.6, 1 d.f., p = 1.26×10−45) ( Fig. 3 ).
highly significantP = 1.2 × 10 −530.0× alphaqualifiedgold
itive individuals, making them suboptimal controls for this analysis. Fine mapping of the LYZ eQTL effect of the resistance-associated variants The resistance-associated variants of the 12q15 locus are in strong linkage disequilibrium ( r 2 > 0.8) and were included in the analysis because of their highly significant eQTL effect on the LYZ gene in whole blood (e.g., rs622656 eQTL normalized effect size (NES) = − 0.55; P = 1.2 × 10 −53 ) and the lung (rs622656 eQTL NES = − 0.35; P = 4.7 × 10 −21 ) in GTEx v8.