“highly significant”

As the storage time of the doogh samples was extended to 30 days, the increase in BPA concentration was again significant; the BPA concentration in the samples related to Brand #1 was 0.187 ± 0.003 mg/L (at this stage, the difference in average concentration compared to the first week and 2 weeks was highly significant; p < 0.0001).

Similarly, there was highly significant variation among the 31 samples (F = 19.0; p<0.0001), with individual mean values ranging from a low of 52.6 (SF 009) to a high of 88.3 (EC 101).

The analyses showed highly significant, strong positive correlations between total AA intake and total fat mass normalized to energy intake ( R 2 = 0.39, P < 0.0001).

Importantly, multivariable Cox analysis demonstrated that CCNF remained a highly significant predictor of OS independently of histologic grade and TNM stage (HR 2.86, 95% CI 2.02–4.06, p < 0.0001; Table 4 ).

A substantial proportion of genetic variation was related to differences among groups (SSR, 8.85%; Cyt b , 47.45%; CR, 44.03%), with highly significant F ST values (SSR, F ST = 0.0612, P < 0.0001; Cyt b , F ST = 0.5291, P < 0.0001; CR, F ST = 0.5792, P < 0.0001) ( Wright, 1978 ) ( Table 3 ).

Migration assays revealed that both lyophilized and fresh PRF caused a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) 15- to 20-fold increase in the number of migrated cells when compared to DMEM medium ( Figure 2D ).

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) among local, introduced, and improved variety sub-groups according to genome revealed a highly significant level of variation ( P <0.0001; Table 4 ).

The Pearson’s correlation coefficient between these two maps was modest but highly significant (r=0.24, p<0.0001 for both smoothed and unsmoothed permuted data; confirmed through a permutation test shuffling voxel location across 100,000 iterations; Figure 2C ).

Chi Square analysis of these total success rates confirmed a highly significant difference between account holders and personal attackers [ χ 2 (1) = 232.6, p < .0001].

The analysis showed that almost all the factors involved in the experimental trial had a highly significant effect on phenolic acids ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 2 ).

Gram-positive strains were notably more common in the non-survivor group, identified in 35 patients (42%) compared to just 10 patients (10%) in the survivor group, a highly significant difference (p<0.0001).

The level of SC5b-9 increased significantly at T2 in the normothermic group, and the differences between T1 and T2 and between T1 and T3 were both highly significant (P<0.0001, Fig 2B ).

In all the models considered at any step, both predictors describing Zebra Mussel occurrence (Dpa and Dpd) were highly significant, implying the strong dependence of Scaup density on the extent of occurrence and density of Zebra Mussels (in the final model Dpa: edf = 2.104, F = 14.532, p < 0.0001, Dpd: edf = 2.546, F = 4.844, p = 0.0048).

During perifusion of both the whole spinal cord and the cervico-trigeminal area, the interaction between the two factors of variation was found to be highly significant indeed (F 1-27 = 24.33 and F 1-22 = 30.17, respectively, p<0.0001; Table S1 ).

Subjects who received GR showed a highly significant increase in SFN in both zones ( p < 0.0001), similar to levels previously observed in breast tissue after similar supplementation.

melliferum populations were more stable year to year ( P = 0.0544) but showed highly significant seasonal variation ( P < 0.0001).

This difference was highly significant at 14 dpi ( S4A–S4B” Fig ; Kolmogorov- smirnov test, p<0.0001), but diminished over time, as the WT cells caught up at 28 and 42 dpi.

The overall F-test from ANODIS was highly significant (P < 0.0001, Table 2 ).

It showed that: - the regression of K on ln(weight) was highly significant (P < 0.0001, a = 0.172), demonstrating a positive correlation between weight and condition factor; The PROSPER method for selecting fish 655 Figure 3.

The agreement for the category “motives of crime” was highly significant (Cohen’s K was 0.92, p < 0.0001; 95% CI = − 0.036–0.101), as it was for the category “contentiousness” (Cohen’s K was 0.90, p < 0.0001; 95% CI = − 0.084–0.123) and for the category “overkilling” (Cohen’s K was 0.81, p < 0.0001; 95% CI = − 0.075–0.180) suggesting, according to Viera and Garrett [ 71 ] and to McHugh [ 72 ], a substantial interrater agreement coefficient for all of these variables.

Overall, there was a highly significant difference between the methoxyflurane and placebo group (estimated treatment effect, −15.1 mm; 95% CI −19.2 to −11.0; p<0.0001).

galegae , the LRT was highly significant (P < 0.0001), and the parameter estimates for N. galegae nifQ indicated an increase in the relative rate of non-synonymous substitution by a factor of 3.

For the risk level model (Table 3 ), the Spearman rank correlation coefficient between the originally measured PROCAM scores and the corresponding predicted risk level values was 0.74, which was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

All associations were highly significant in both sexes, P <0.0001.

Differences between singletons and between twins are highly significant ( p =0.0001 and p =0.0002, respectively).