“highly significant”

The results clearly demonstrate highly significant CD4 + and CD8 + T cell allogeneic immunization in partners practising unprotected homosexual (p<0.0001 and p = 0.001) or heterosexual (p = 0.001 and p<0.0001) intercourse, respectively.

The relative proportion of C>T/G>A changes was highly significant compared to other nucleotide changes (p < 0.0001, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance) and formed 32% of all nucleotide changes overall, a proportion that was double what was expected due to chance.

Indeed, the TFI was highly significant ( χ 2 (1) = 45.88, p < .0001, OR = 0.000002, 95% CI = [4.73e−08, 0.00009]).

The average hyphal areas in the zep-A2 and zep-B1 mutants were approximately 50% of those in the WT, and these differences were highly significant (Student’s t -test, P < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 G).

4 (G to I) , there was a highly significant difference in exosomal Aβ 1–42 levels between 5×FAD mice and C57BL/6 controls by iMEP ( P < 0.0001, unpaired t test).

Although, there was a highly significant positive correlation between the two variables in all four stages, the correlation was not strong ( r = 0.24 ± 0.03, p < 0.0001).

The difference between VO 2 peak/kg values was highly significant among all pairwise comparisons ( p < 0.0001), excluding that between the 35–40 kg/m 2 and 40–45 kg/m 2 groups.

Not only are the correlations highly significant for infected implants in statistical terms (e.g., P <0.0001 for CCR5 + ITTP versus both Gag-p24 + ITTP and thymocyte viability), but the proportion of CCR5 + ITTP corresponds closely to that of infected ITTP ( Figure 4A ).

The correlations between these measures are highly significant (Pearson p < 0.0001).

The mean number of blood vessels market with CD105 is higher in tumor mass then at its base, p value of the Student t test being highly significant (p<0.0001).

In subadult and adult females, after the upward trend from the 1980s to 2010s, the decrease in body mass in the 2020s was less pronounced than in males but still highly significant (F 4,846 = 12.8, p < 0.0001 and F 4,1029 = 4.6, p < 0.002, respectively).

The difference in the TCT of both orange peeling and suturing between sessions 1, 5, and 10 was highly significant ( P < .0001) ( Table 1 ).

The decline close to the cell bodies was not significant (37 ± 3% to 26 ± 4%; Figures 3E and 4A ; t -test, P < 0.08; n = 31), but the three-fold decline at longer distances (>250 μm) was highly significant (14 ± 2% at P36 to P40 to 4 ± 1% at >P41; t -test, P < 0.0001).

In comparison to ∆ odc mutants supplemented with polyamines, the difference was highly significant, with p < 0.0001 observed on days 4, 7, and 10.

These differences remained highly significant after controlling for age (ANCOVA p -values <0.0001 to 0.0012).

The time course for total distance traversed in the novel open field over a 30-min time period was highly significant, as expected, representing habituation to the novel open field by both B6 (panel a; F (5, 20) =66.92, p <0.0001) and BTBR (panel b; F (5, 21) =65.99, p <0.0001).

In addition, there were highly significant correlations in the immunostaining scores between these two-paired sets ( r >0.90 and P <0.0001, for each protein).

The Wilks’ lambda statistic was extremely low at 0.00303, corresponding to a highly significant approximate F-value of 17.353 ( p < 0.0001).

The difference between these values is highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

6B ), and variation between genotypes was highly significant ( P <0.0001).

The overlap between MDAMB231 and testis is highly significant for both gene and 3′UTR sets (χ 2 = P < 0.0001; Figure 3A ).

Specifically, the inhibition zones generated by 1R6F AqEx were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) compared with PBS and significantly larger than those induced by IQOS AqEx (for S. pneumoniae, p = 0.002; for K. pneumonia , p = 0.002).

There was significant difference between virtually all antibiotics in the two periods studied, which was commonly highly significant ( p < 0.0001); however, no difference was observed between the antibiotics used for coverage of Gram-positive bacteria, except for rifampin and oxacillin.

In Tvedestrandsfjord, which included five replicate egg samples but no adults, there was a highly significant heterogeneity among temporal samples in proportions of the two types ( p < 0.0001: Table 1 ).

These differences were confirmed by ANOVA, in which F values for genotypic differences were highly significant ( P = 0.0001; Table 2 ) and coefficient of variation (CV) ranged from 16.5 to 28.6% for parental genotypes and from 40.0 to 83.7% for the RILs.