“highly significant”

Also a highly significant correlation was determined for relationship between Hg concentration of the caps (0.78; p < 0.0001) and stipes (0.89; p < 0.0001) of the fruiting bodies and soil substratum for all Boletus spp.

This separation is highly significant ( p < 10 −4 , permutation test, see Materials and Methods).

Through statistical analyses, we confirmed the device’s efficacy in differentiating between active disease stages and remission stages, yielding a highly significant p -value of p < 0.0001.

Nonetheless, we performed a post hoc examination of their correlation with CTF scores (see Table 5 ) which found consistent, highly significant ( P < 0.0001) moderate correlations ranging from 0.37 to 0.55.

The TUNEL counts for the Grk1 −/− ;B6J mice were also highly significant compared to the B6J and B6N mice in the 1-month-old superior retinas (****p<0.0001) but were less significant for the 1- and 3-month-old inferior retinas (***p<0.001) and the 3-month-old superior retinas (**p<0.01).

There was a highly significant difference between the groups concerning systolic hemodynamic values (CI, MPI and EF) (p < 0.0001).

Regressions of environmental suitability index versus latitude were highly significant (Fig. 4 ) but with low predictive power (Fig. 4 ) by a low R -value (“black” form: R 2 = 0.0004, P < 0.0001, intercept = 0.54; “red” form: R 2 = 0.002, P < 0.0001, intercept = 0.66).

Linear regression analyses revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) difference between the curves of the control measurements ( Figure 2 a).

The CLEC treatment provided an accelerated wound closure that was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) over time compared to the other two treatment arms.

1 , 6 , 7 , S3), and these were highly significant differences between the two species (2-tailed t = 23.7, df = 60, P < 0001).

Calendar year explained 79% of the observed variance (R2 = 0.786), indicating a substantial acceleration in treatment initiation over time, the slope of this decline was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

2B ) both showed highly significant differences in their growth curves after iron supplementation (p < 0.0001).

ns, p > 0.05 , not significant; p ≤ 0.05 , significant; p ≤ 0.01 , very significant; p ≤ 0.001 , highly significant; p ≤ 0.0001 , extremely significant.

However, 55 of 60 farms with a mains supply to the farmhouse also had a mains water supply for their cattle and there is highly significant correlation between the farmhouse and cattle water sources (χ 2 = 44.5, df = 1, p < 0.0001).

In all areas that were analyzed (CA1, CA3, hilus, and dentate gyrus), there was a highly significant main effect for group ( p < 0.0001 for all areas) but not for treatment (CA3: p = 0.2708; CA1: p = 0.6038; dentate gyrus: p = 0.6610; hilus: p = 0.8269).

These results yielded highly significant class distinction between NEC and Sepsis (AUC = 0.958; p < 0.0001 ) ( Fig. 2C ) as well as NEC and control (AUC = 0.91; p < 0.0001 ) ( Supplemental Fig. 3 ).

Analyses of tumour characteristics by year of diagnosis showed a significant trend towards lower risk tumours in more recent years, driven by a highly significant trend towards lower nodal status (p<0·0001 for both oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen receptor-negative groups; table 1 ; appendix p 35 ).

In slices from animals exposed to kynurenine and probenecid, galantamine increased the plateau LTP even further, with ANOVA indicating a highly significant increase compared with controls ( F (9,70) = 57.8, P < 0.0001) and with all individual points significantly different at P < 0.0001.

The slope further increased to 199.8 in the 2010s and 379.3 in the 2020s, both showing highly significant growth rates ( p < 0.0001).

5 e) with a highly significant positive correlation between LAMP1 levels and Ox-stress ( Fig. 5 f, Spearman test: ****p < 0.0001).

For the inflammaging score (z), both main effects were highly significant: periodontal status (F = 175.67, p < 0.0001) and BMD status (F = 131.80, p < 0.0001) ( Table 5 ).

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with an F-value of 32.68, and the lack of fit was non-significant ( p = 0.3150), confirming the model’s adequacy.

HIT was considered highly significant to identify areflexic ears ( p = 0.0001) ( Table 4 ).

This response is well described by a quadratic model (Equation (6)), which was highly significant according to ANOVA ( p < 0.0001, Table S1 ).

The correlation between these two variates was highly significant ( r = 0.91, p <0.0001), indicating that the MGC-PNs' bursting property was predictive of their responsiveness – the higher the burstiness, the stronger the response.