“highly significant”

A two-way ANOVA yielded a highly significant interaction (F(10,22) = 14.21; p<0.0001) between gene copy and developmental stage that had not been reported in earlier studies ( Himi et al., 2001 ), and is indicative of differential gene expression between CrLFY1 and CrLFY2 that is dependent on developmental stage.

The effect of regime on development time was large and highly significant ( F 1,265 = 66.75, P < 0.0001), with exposure to constant temperatures reducing developmental period for all possible regime x temperature x sex treatment comparisons ( Fig. 5 ).

boulardii CW extract was highly significant in all groups, except the group with 2.5 mg/mL concentration ( P <0.0001).

Experiments that supplemented carotenoids rather than correlations with concentrations of carotenoids in blood resulted in significantly larger effect sizes (p = 0.006), but an analysis without the supplementation studies still yielded a highly significant overall effect size ( table 2 , p<0.0001).

Similarly to primed NK cells, a highly significant positive correlation between the up-regulation of OX40 and CD137 by IL-2 stimulated NK cells was observed (rs = 0.741, P = 0.0001) (Figure 10G ).

The one-way ANOVA conducted for testing significance of the mean iH O among the six populations investigated was highly significant: F 5,172 = 31.92, p < 0.0001).

There was a significant difference between number of MIS surgeries in 2009 and 2012 (p<0.0001) and there is a highly significant difference between average number of open and MIS surgeries in 2012 (p<0.0001) among the surveyed surgeons.

We therefore performed one-way MANOVAs which showed highly significant differences among vegetation types within the tropics ( F 2,67 = 27.33, P < 0.0001) and the temperate zone ( F 2,55 = 6.54, P = 0.003), and in the combined analysis ( F 5,122 = 14.5, P < 0.0001).

While in the fixed effect model, a highly significant association was observed (OR= 1.67, 95% CI: 1.33 to 2.09, p<0.0001).

Comparison of distance errors The comparison of the distance reproduction error shows a main effect of distance [ F (9,38) = 136.2, p < 0.0001] together with a highly significant interaction of condition and distance [ F (18,342) = 3.45, p < 0.0001].

The results of the main analysis using an adjusted model, controlling for multiple covariates, were however highly significant (χ 2 = 1317·65, df = 7, p < 0·0001; Table 2 ); consistent with our hypothesis, the 22q11.2 deletion was a significant independent predictor of risk of T2D (OR=2·44, 95% CI = 1·39–4·31).

Area under the curve (AUC) of the HFA, TIMI RS and Goldman tools for the endpoint of MACE was 0.54, 0.71 and 0.67, respectively, with the difference between the tools in predictive ability for MACE being highly significant [chi 2 (3) = 67.21, N = 276, p < 0.0001].

Semen Parameters Treatment with the Ashwagandha root extract resulted in a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) increase in sperm concentration after 90 days of therapy, as compared to the baseline value on Day 0 of the study period ( Table 2 ).

All correlations remained highly significant ( P <0.0001) after controlling for ethnicity, socioeconomic status, birth weight, placental weight, gestational age at delivery, parity, tobacco smoking status (0, 1–10 or >11 cigarettes smoked per day), labor onset, labor induction, labor duration, oxytocin administration, tocolytic administration, antenatal steroid administration, APH, PTB, and PROM in multiple regression analysis.

Analysis of these data by Fisher’s exact test showed that protection was statistically significant in each individual study (group 1, p = 0.025; and group 2, p = 0.003), while the combined results were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), demonstrating the efficacy of Emulsigen as an adjuvant in this system.

Similarly, the percentage of positive fields for IL-13Rα2 expression in 2+ and 3+ positive specimens in IHC analysis demonstrated a highly significant trend in these specimens (well differentiated = 35.0%, moderately differentiated = 82.0% and poorly differentiated = 94%; exact p < 0.0001) compared to PDAC samples with negative values of IL-13Rα2 (≤ 1+) ( Figure 1 D).

In general, the impact of age on the three cost outcomes was highly significant (p < 0.0001) within all four subgroups.

There was a highly significant decrease in the number of children requiring rescue analgesic ( P =0.0001) in group D [ Table 4 ].

However, highly significant differences (p<0.0001) were observed between the initial testing and the following 2 years testings in the VH.

The association between continuous NLR and breast cancer remained highly significant across all models, with ORs of 8.39 (95% CI: 4.40, 16.02, P < 0.0001) in the unadjusted model, 8.08 (95% CI: 4.15, 15.73, P < 0.0001) in the partially adjusted model, and 7.69 (95% CI: 3.72, 15.92, P < 0.0001) in the fully adjusted model.

The species did occupy a rather narrow extent of the gradients (with lower and upper thirds for Ellenberg indicator values for light at 6.7 and 7.4, respectively; for moisture at 4.4 and 5.3; and for nitrogen at 5.4 and 6.9), but interspecies differences in habitat preferences according to EIVs (tested using ANOVA without phylogenetic correction) were highly significant ( p <0.0001) and relatively strong (ca. 50% variation in EIVL/EIVM/EIVN explained by species identity).

Simultaneously, the results from Table 2 reveal that the individual factors A and D exert a highly significant influence on the response value ( p < 0.0001), while factors B and C exhibit a significant impact ( p < 0.05).

The results indicate that Group (ASD and the two TD groups) and Task (with and without objects) as main factors, are highly significant: (Group: F [2,75] 72,55 p<.0001; Task F [1,75] 220,52 p<.0001).

The log-rank test for difference across the categories of CBP was highly significant for all of the end points under study ( p <0.0001).

In fact, cladistic analyses, indicating that the appendix has evolved independently at least twice (once in diprotodont marsupials and once in Euarchontoglires), show a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) phylogenetic signal in its distribution, and has been maintained in mammalian evolution for 80 millions years or longer [ 15 ].