“highly significant”

The pretest mean score of the participants for the level of drug adherence were 39.34 ± 7.015, during posttest it was 45.40 ± 5.417 which was highly significant ( p = 0.000).

Moreover, mediation analysis in which the direction of causation in the model is reversed, i.e., to explore whether motor deficits mediate between disease duration and cerebral WM FA, we find only weak evidence of this mediation effect (δ = − 0.0003, CI 95% = − 0.0007 to 0, p = 0.06), while the direct path between disease duration and cerebral WM FA remains highly significant (ζ = − 0.0014, CI 95% = − 0.0022 to 0, p ~ 0).

One author suggests that if the result is highly significant, P value should not be written as “P = 0.000” but presented as “P < 0.001.”[ 7 ] For any range, it is better to avoid using the dash “-” as it may be misinterpreted as a negative sign; instead, it should be presented as “between and,” for example, BMI ranged between 25.1 and 34.9 kg/m 2 . 6 Tables and figures are the cornerstones of the result.

The analysis revealed that the feeding method itself had a highly significant impact ( p = 0.000), confirming that IOF is associated with reduced hospital stays.

Visually the distributions are quite distinct, with TE derived exons having far lower coding potential, and accordingly there is a highly significant difference between the two coding probability distributions, D = 0.67 P = 0 Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (Figure 4A ).

The requirement of first dose of rescue analgesia was 160 ± 25 min in control group and 360 ± 30 min in ESP groups ( P = 0.00, highly significant) [ Table 2 ].

The steroid dose differences between ABVD × 2–4 versus ABVD × 6, ABVD × 6 versus EB × 2 + ABVD × 4 and EB × 2 + ABVD × 4 versus EB × 4–6 protocols were highly significant ( p = 0.000) ( Table 2 ). 3.2.

ANXA1 expression showed a highly significant association with pathological type (p =0.00), and triple negative receptor status ( p =0.03).

Applying Pearson’s chi-square test, we found a highly significant statistical difference in grade of SCC differentiation in patients with and without neck metastasis (p = 0.0000).

The PHQ9 depression score was higher in sleepy subjects with SES ≥ 11 compared to non-sleepless subjects; the difference being very highly significant (PHQ9=11.97 ± 4.99 and 6.54 ± 5.27 respectively; p=0.0000).

The level of significance was determined using paired t -test with 95% CI that showed a highly significant P -value ( P < 0) that is representing there is a significant difference between tested variables, i.e., pre-test score and post-test score ( Table 2B ).

Both factors are highly significant ( p = 0.000) with an explanatory power of 89% and 54%, respectively.

The Bartlett’s test of spherity was highly significant (χ2 (378) = 2836.48, p < 0.00).

Concentration has a highly significant impact ( p = 0.0000), while cultivars also show a significant effect ( p = 0.0442).

Statistical analysis revealed that the difference in the mean day of complete wound healing for the CE group was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.000).

These values were found to be highly significant both in maxilla ( P = 0.000) and mandible ( P = 0.001).

The association between the frequency of use and the level of satisfaction is highly significant ( p = 0.000).

Genes’ expression of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α) showed statistical significant decrease in groups treated either with neupogen only or MSCs only ( P <0.05), with highly significant decrease observed in MSCs and neupogen treated group compared with fibrosis group ( P =0.000) ( Figure 3 A–C, respectively).

Both the groups showed a statistically significant reduction of sclerostin levels in GCF after 3 months, in which the test group (125.80 ± 28.21 to 82.80 ± 9.31) showed a highly significant reduction ( P = 0.000).

A highly significant association was found between the perceived level of safety and level of competence (Chi 2 [4, n = 57) = 27.282, P ≤ 0.000) and the availability of PPE (Chi 2 [4, n = 52] = 14.208, P = 0.007).

Concerning the quantitative evaluation of new bone formation in the CSD, treatment either by PRF either alone (PRF group) or in combination with ZnONPs (PRF/ZnONPs group) revealed a highly significant ( P = 0.000) increase in the percent of CSD filling rate versus the control group (Fig. 2 ).

Furthermore, 29 out of 55 patients with HE (52.7%) had hyponatraemia, compared with only 18 of the 110 patients (16.4%) in HBV-ACLF patients without HE, this difference was highly significant (P = 0.000).

The Spearman correlation between total deviation and pattern deviation was highly significant ( p = 0,00).

The test showed that the difference in medians between both tasks was highly significant, with p -value = 0.

On follow up, raised mean MVD was seen in those cases with relapse/deceased as compared to disease-free patients, which was highly significant (p = 0.000).