Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The linear regression fitted to log length and number of oysters per sack was highly significant (adjusted r 2 = 0.93, F 58 = 809, p < 0.0001), and yielded the following predictive relationship between the number of oysters in a known volume and the mean oyster length: h = 10 (−0.3537 log b + 2.8361) , where h is SH (from umbo to growth edge) in millimetres, and b is the number of oysters in a 52.85 l volume (standard Louisiana sack).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The main effect of ROIs was highly significant at the three thresholds ( F (5,233) = 18.99, p < 0.0001; F (5,201) = 12.80, p < 0.0001 and F (5,107) = 4.36, p < 0.0001), and interactions were observed between Age Group and ROIs in all but the most stringent threshold ( F (1,233) = 14.99, p = 0.0001; F (1,201) = 7.85, p = 0.006 and F (1,107) = 0.03, p = 0.864).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A two-way ANOVA analysis showed that the ratio of activated carbon to AC-1 had a highly significant impact on the recovery rate of immobilized AC-1 strains over 120 days of storage ( F = 6.842, p < 0.0001), while the variance analysis results between the bacterial suspension and fermentation broth were significant ( F = 3.274, p < 0.01) ( Figure 1 ).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There were no significant effects of dropping the “treatment” × “stage” interaction ( χ 2 = 0.62, Δdf = 3, P = 0.89) nor of dropping “stage” ( χ 2 = 2.23, Δdf = 1, P = 0.14) but again dropping “treatment” had a highly significant effect upon model fit ( χ 2 = 48.52, Δdf = 3, P < 0.0001; Table 3 , experiment 2).
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We observed a highly significant inverse correlation between these parameters with both Pearson’s and Spearman’s tests (r = −0.617 and r = −0.611, respectively; P <0.0001) (Figure 2 ).
highly significantP < 0001the decimal point is missing; read as 0.0001qualifiedgold
There were highly significant differences (P < 0001) between the analysed mean Hg, As and turbidity levels and the permissible levels in surface water with the potential of affecting ecosystem services including water for drinking, water for recreational, water for irrigational, and water for aqua culture purposes.