“highly significant”

The TUNEL counts for the Grk1 −/− ;B6J mice were also highly significant compared to the B6J and B6N mice in the 1-month-old superior retinas (****p<0.0001) but were less significant for the 1- and 3-month-old inferior retinas (***p<0.001) and the 3-month-old superior retinas (**p<0.01).

Effects of treatments on yield and yield components Nutrient treatments had a very highly significant effect on wheat grain yield and thousand-seed weight (p < 0.0001).

After induction of general anesthesia and creation of pneumoperitoneum, a progressive increase in modified LUS score was seen after intubation, after deflation of pneumoperitoneum, 30 min after extubation and 24 h post-extubation compared to the baseline Preoperatively; the difference is statistically highly significant, P < 0.0001 ( Fig. 3 ).

4 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Recurrence with supra-auricular was 4 (1.2%) and with sinusectomy was 76 (8.1%) with a highly significant difference (X 2 = 19.874; p < 0.0001) ( Table 2 ).

The repeated‐measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference among total, dominant, and nondominant mBF (F(2,334) = 136.30, p < 0.0001).

At the Lönnstorp site, genotypic variance was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for all traits except NS and SL ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

However when MT 0.5 mg/kg and 0.75 mg/kg were compared with 0.5 mg/kg midazolam [ Figure 1 ], the results were significant with MT 0.5 mg/kg ( P = 0.0407) and highly significant with MT 0.75 mg/kg ( P = 0.0001).

The highest percentage of kidney pathology in PCR‐positive fish was detected in the 0+ fish age class (85%), this category shows a highly significant difference compared with age categories 1+, 2+ and 3+ ( p < 0.0001), whereas no significant differences were detected among the remaining groups (Table 1 ).

For △ spoIID and △spoIIP , differences observed in each stage are highly significant, with p < 0.0001.

All variables included in the SDMs were highly significant for both the pine and the disease (p-value < 0.0001).

As shown in Figure 3 , rEg.P29 alone did not induce a significant increase in specific IgG at 20 weeks post-immunization, whereas the formulation with Quil A adjuvant elicited a highly significant increase in rEg.P29-specific IgG ( P < 0.0001), confirming that Quil A is essential for inducing a robust IgG-dominant humoral immune response in sheep.

The combination of IMAR and DEMAR resulted in a highly significant artefact reduction than IMAR alone (p<0.0001).

Survival analysis confirmed a highly significant difference between the two cohorts, with OM patients experiencing a substantially reduced risk of death (HR = 0.1974; 95% CI: 0.1095–0.3559; P < 0.0001 by log-rank test).

When comparing the SEDC group to all other phenotypes combined, the difference in the frequency of multiple ossification centers was highly significant (Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.0001).

For qPCR, the concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) for all pairs (A–B, A–C and B–C) exceeded 0.95, with highly significant Pearson correlations ( p < 0.0001), confirming strong concordance.

RESULTS: Medians of liver stiffness measurement by shear wave velocity showed a significant increase as a grade of liver fibrosis increases (p ≤ 0.0001, highly significant).

Although significant lack of fit was observed for some responses, the models were retained because they remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and exhibited satisfactory coefficients of determination and adjusted R 2 values.

The log-rank test indicated a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) when the PrC-210 survival curves were compared to their respective vehicle-treated groups (i.e., fasted or fed).

The tests showed a highly significant support of positive selection for TAAR7 ( P < 0.0001) and a weak but significant support ( P = 0.0327) for TAAR8 ( S4 Table ).

20 , 21 , 27 , 28 The difference between median dd-cfDNA levels in low and high hs-troponin I groups was highly significant (median dd-cfDNA: 0.04% versus 2.35%, respectively; P < 0.0001; Figure 2 D).

The correlation between B-cell counts and mTLS area was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with an r value reaching 0.900 ( Figure 7 K).

A pairwise comparison between load levels separately for alphabetical and forward conditions showed highly significant differences (p < 0.0001) for all pairs but two.

An independent samples t- test was performed which showed a highly significant difference difference in the crowding effect between the older and younger group ( t(30.92)= – 5.83, p < 0.0001, Cohen’s d=-1.94) [see Fig. 8] .

Repeated measures ANOVA showed that there was a highly significant interaction between acupuncture mode (verum vs. sham) and time (across all three treatment sessions) for rACC/MPFC Fisher Z values [F(2,27) = 13.403, p < 0.0001].

Overdose recovery time is highly significant ( P < 0.0001) between the Naloximeter and self-recovery ( N = 3 and 4; recovery times = 4.5 ± 0.3 and 23 ± 4 min, respectively).