“highly significant”

Another useful measure of the strength of the relationship is the Spearman rank correlation ρ (rho) and associated P -value for a Mantel test, which was highly significant for the data shown in Fig. 6 (ρ = 0.855, P = 0.0001, Table 2 ).

Moreover, 8 classes, including CE, CER, DAG, FFA, LPC, PC, SM, and TAG, showed highly significant differentiation with p -values < 0.0001 ( Table 1 ).

Judging from the magnitudes of the log-hazard ratios, nodal status is more influential than the T stage in predicting survival, although both are highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The ANOVA results of the regression model demonstrated that the model is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and the lack-of-fit value ( p = 0.7403) showed that the model fit well in the experimental design.

The spatial autocorrelation was highly significant (p-values: Obsoletus group model: p<0.0001, Pulicaris group model: p<0.0001), and was estimated to be 0.41 (+/-0.09) for the Obsoletus group model and 0.235 (+/-0.09) for the Pulicaris group model for traps placed with 50 m distance.

Statistical significance is indicated in the figures by asterisks, using the following standard notation: * for p ≤ 0.05 (significant), ** for p ≤ 0.01 (very significant), *** for p ≤ 0.001 (highly significant), and **** for p ≤ 0.0001 (extremely significant).

Within the patient group, there was both a highly significant main effect of distractor expression (F(1,33) = 20.9, p < 0.0001) and a significant interaction of distractor expression by resting state group, F(1,33) = 8.6 p = 0.006.

This was supported by the highly significant Cochrane Q -test ( Q = 1133.19, p < 0.0001) and high heterogeneity indices (I 2 =93.73 %, T 2 =132.95, T = 11.53).

Substance and alcohol abuse and supplement use Association with MD and alcohol use measured by RAPI was highly significant (Table 5 ) (p < 0.0001).

Two-way ANOVA demonstrated a highly significant interaction between fungal species and antigen concentration ( P < 0.0001), confirming that the observed dose-dependent response is unique to TMCYA.

The need for antibiotic therapy after 48 h post-procedure was significantly higher in patients who underwent open laparotomy (71%) and conventional laparoscopy (45.4%) compared to TSILA (25.3%), with a highly significant association in the general analysis ( p < 0.0001).

ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among treatments ( p < 0.0001), and Tukey’s post hoc test confirmed that the combination exhibited significantly higher inhibition compared to salicylic acid ( p < 0.001) and ibuprofen ( p < 0.001) alone, while ibuprofen was also significantly stronger than salicylic acid ( p < 0.001).

At the vestibular area, TRIOS demonstrated the lowest RMS value, followed by VPS and Medit, with a highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001).

Moreover, all factors were highly significant ( p < 0.01%) for the anti-candida activity response ( Y2 ).

The difference in percentage of biotype A observed with QD fluorescence in the anterior foregut or cibarium in these two treatments was highly significant ( P < 0.0001; Fisher’s exact test).

The associations remained significant for both KIR2DS2 (p = 0.0083 p c = 0.1162; OR = 2.06; 95%CI = 1.2–3.4) and KIR2DS3 (p = 0.0008 p c = 0.0112; OR = 2.37; 95%CI = 1.4–3.9), and the KIR profile composed of all three genes was also highly significant, showing an even higher OR (p < 0.0001 p c = 0.0014; OR = 3 95%CI 1.8–4.7).

Results : The 2-thread VOI yielded a highly significant difference in bone volume fraction (BV/TV) between groups (68.86 ± 4.97% vs. 50 ± 4.32%, p < 0.0001, Cohen’s d = 4.05), while the 5-thread VOI showed no significant difference.

Similarly, the p -values remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for uncorrected and corrected), further confirming the strong correlation between temperature and uptake rate constants in both cases.

Comparative statistics (Friedman test) indicated that the differences between the groups are highly significant (P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 1 C) even after only the first 3 months of treatment with Alxoid.

Statistical analysis using ANOVA confirmed that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with an F-value of 34.47.

The Friedman test indicated a highly significant overall reduction in pain scores across these time points (χ2(6) = 104.2, P < 0.0001).

Of these, 339 CpGs, associated with 222 genes, were also DM in the HCC samples, representing a highly significant overlap ( P < 0.0001, hypergeometric test, Fig. 2C , Fig.

Differences between strains were highly significant by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (F(3, 8) = 299.2, p < 0.0001).

This baseline log-ratio was highly significant (p < 0.0001) in the model.

Most importantly, the predicted three-way interaction of Person, Observed Action and Compatibility was highly significant ( F [1, 30] = 21.3, p < .0001).