“highly significant”

The proposed models for all responses were highly significant with values ranging from p < 0.0001 to p = 0.0005 (Table 2 ).

The correlation coefficient of MRD between qPCR and ddPCR was 0.95 and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1 ).

The quadratic terms (A2, B2, and C2) were all highly significant ( p < 0.0001), affirming the nonlinear behavior of the system.

Differences were considered significant at various p -values: p > 0.050 was considered non-significant, p < 0.050 (*) was significant, p < 0.010 (**) was very significant, p < 0.001 (***) was highly significant and p < 0.0001 (****) was extremely significant. 5.

The control evaluation yielded a highly significant difference in lines slopes between both groups ( p ≤ 0.0001).

Concerning aerated areas, the results showed highly significant differences in the attenuation values for both lungs in sedated animals compared to those during spontaneous breathing under anesthesia ( p < 0.0001) and during induced apnea ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 1 ).

Locomotor function during nigrostriatal lesion progression Prior to random assignment into NE or EX groups, reduced forelimb use was confirmed in 6-OHDA lesioned rats on day 7 (1 wk) post-lesion (F (1,29) = 64.6, p < 0.0001), with highly significant difference between sham and lesion groups (Sham, 105.7 ± 2.6%; 6-OHDA, 46 ± 4.3%) (F (1,31) = 97.8, p < 0.0001), but not between rats assigned to NE or EX groups prior to initiating exercise (F (1,31) = 0.13, p = 0.72) ( Fig. 3A ).

The lymphocytes count increased slightly in the other groups. Table 2 represents the measured data of the reactive lymphocytes in controls and x-ray technicians for different exposure time. Highly significant increasing value was observed for reactive lymphocytes (P=<0.0001) for all the groups in comparing with their control.

Results Analysis of Phenotypic Variation for Disease Severity at Seedling Stage The ANOVA results revealed highly significant variation ( P < 0.0001) for germplasm lines and pathotypes ( Table 1 ) while the genotype × year interaction effect was found to be non-significant.

There were highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) from the Swiss population in patients from Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Turkey and significant differences ( p < 0.05) in patients from Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, and Serbia. 3.3.

The overall model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and showed substantial fit ( R 2 = 0.8684) ( Fig. 5E ).

RESULTS The first CFA model resulted in a misfit as the overall chi‐square test was highly significant ( χ 2 = 192.18, df = 80, p < .0001, CFI = .98, RMSEA = .051).

There was a highly significant correlation between genetic distances based on the two molecular markers (Mantel test: r = 0.616, p = 0.0001).

In diabetic wound healing, the experimental observation (rate of contraction, epithelization, mean wound healing time) of the study group exposed to 3-7 J/cm 2 dose were highly significant as compared to the control group ( P < 0.0001).

The same conclusion was reached by a study conducted in Guatemala on the link between the nutritional status of children with cancer and socioeconomic status, which showed that SES was associated with the nutritional status of children with cancer, the lower the SES, the greater the nutritional vulnerability, with a highly significant association ( p < 0.0001) ( 32 ).

Using independent t -test for the out-of-pocket expenditure incurred during ANC Visits at government and private health set up, it was found that there was highly significant difference between governments and private expenditures for registration, Ultrasonography (USG), laboratory tests, medicines ( P < 0.0001) and transportation ( P = 0.001).

The rate of transcript reduction was highly significant ( P <0.0001) between the onset of the disease and day +22, between days +22 and +45, and between days +57 and +85.

As shown, there are highly significant positive relationships between PAS total score and SBS score (r = 0.527, p < 0.0001), between SBS score and openness (r = 0.455, p < 0.0001), and between SBS score and agreeableness (r = 0.433, p < 0.0001).

The Analysis of Variance on memory performance on the three word categories across the two participant groups revealed a highly significant main effect of word category in both ISR ( F (2, 40) = 33.9, p < 0.0001) and DSR ( F (2, 34) = 48.4, p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant association between the spa and agr type ( p < 0.0001), and for most spa -CCs, all isolates belonged to a single agr type.

Table 4 shows that one linear (A) and two quadratic variables (A 2 and B 2 ) were significant at p < 0.001, two linear terms (B, C) were significant at p < 0.01, and one interaction (AB) was significant at p < 0.05 while one quadratic variable was highly significant at p < 0.0001.

There was a highly significant media*volatile interaction ( p < 0.0001) for the raw responses reflective of compounds that not only differ in media solubility but also differences in response factors arising from electron impact mass spectrometry.

Comparison of normal mucosa, tumor-adjacent mucosa, and tumors disclosed a strong and highly significant (p < 0.0001) up-regulation of EpEX in tumors with median IHC scores of 220 versus 60 and 50 in tumor-adjacent and healthy mucosa, respectively (Fig. 1d ).

Indeed, of the 250 males captured in the study, 58 were seropositive (23.2%) compared to 22 of 249 (8.8%) females, which is highly significant ( χ 2 = 13.80, 1 df, p <10 −4 ).

The test revealed a highly significant association (χ 2 (38) = 3616.46, p < 0.0001, V = .12), indicating that the SOC profile of ADRs varies substantially depending on the anti-EGFR agent.