“highly significant”

A high number of scans for the head, chest and abdomen/pelvis had incidental findings (92%, 62% and 96%, respectively) compared with non-incidental group (80%, 26% and 46%, respectively); each group comparison was highly significant (p<0.0001).

This difference was statistically highly significant (p<0.0001), a similar situation being recorded also for the mean scores of the PSS (p<0.0001) (Table 4 ).

Change of methods in SA and CS With respect to the methods used in SA, we found a highly significant effect that the rate of intoxication-related SA significantly increased in adult patients during the pandemic (Pearson’s Chi-squared test, Chi 2 = 50.1, p < 0.0001; Table 2 ).

The overall effect of the IIRC grouping was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 3 ).

Mean performances and analysis variance The pooled ANOVA indicated highly significant differences for restorer lines, with a significant effect of environments and G × E interaction (GEI) ( p < 0.0001) for all of the studied traits, indicating substantial phenotypic variation among the 240 rice restorer lines across the three test environments for all of the traits studied.

In GAPDH highly significant differences between all pairwise tissue comparisons were observed (p<0.0001), which supports the decision to abandon it as a reference gene in our study.

Interestingly, post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction returned a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) difference between the pure DMEM and each of the tested cell lines, showing that the sensor is capable of detecting adherent cells with respect to medium only, with the resonant frequency of the medium containing cancer cells being consistently lower than that of pure DMEM.

Overall, the discrimination between three groups (H, K and C) was highly significant (Wilks’ Lambda: 0.0354; F (16,216) = 58.247; p < 0.0001).

The analysis revealed a highly significant main effect of binarization method (F(1.776, 115.4) = 1689, p < 0.0001).

The difference between both conditions, however, proves to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a higher average correlation length in the presence of fluid shear stress of 33.3 μm, compared to 24.1 μm in the case of no fluid flow.

The final model was highly significant (p value <0.0001).

Household Food Analysis Households constitute the largest source of food waste, averaging 69.66 kg per capita, with highly significant country-level variation (Chi-square = 80.03; p < 0.0001).

Comparison of respiration rates at 5 to 35°C yielded also highly significant differences (two-tailed, unpaired t-test p<0.0001, DF = 23, t = 15.512).

Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences (****, p < 0.0001) between LPS control and the higher atorvastatin concentrations, confirming potent suppression of TNF-α production.

Individual p -values, however, were reported for 4 only, deemed highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Since the outcome variable, COPD deaths, is of spatial nature, we tested for the spatial autocorrelation using the Moran’s I statistic, 11 which suggested a highly significant spatial autocorrelation (p < 0.0001).

The test for subgroup differences was highly significant ( P < .0001), confirming that the type of control treatment substantially influenced the magnitude of mPFS benefit associated with osimertinib.

Young women (15–19 years) were the most susceptible, with an RR of 2.06 (95% CI: 1.92–2.21), highly significant ( p < 0.0001); this RR was 2.5 after 1 month of HBC use, remained above 2 during the first year, and was 30% higher after 7 years.

Furthermore, 58.8% of patients with gastric cancer had history of gastric diseases almost twice higher than those in healthy controls (28.1%), revealing highly significant odds ratio (OR 3.65, 95%CI 2.10-6.35, p<0.0001).

Highly significant improvement of the relevant symptoms was shown for all eight bladder symptoms (all p < 0.0001).

Although risk group classification was highly significant on univariate analysis (p=0.0001; worsened outcome with increased risk group), this finding disappeared on multivariable analysis.

Isolate × Genotype interactions were highly significant in leaves (χ 2 = 83.69), stems (χ 2 = 51.71), and roots (χ 2 = 126.6; all p < 0.0001).

For GF1 cells (Figure 3a ), the highest (M‐PM crystal, 1.236 ± 0.312) and the lowest (Therapon Transpa, 0.813 ± 0.160) relative cell viability were found within the group of milled resins, and their difference was highly significant ( p < .0001).

Figure 4e shows the highly significant levels of necrosis in neurons caused by MS A-FT ( p < 0.0001).

Similarly, the correlation of the infection neutralization capacity of Omicron BA.1 and NAb was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and moderately (rho = 0.44) positive.