“highly significant”

This behavior for the 31-mm balloon is illustrated by the highly significant negative correlation between intraluminal pressure and ovality index observed in both 24-mm and 30-mm PV models (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively), indicating reduced occlusion efficacy in increasingly elliptical anatomies.

The heterogeneity in the studies was highly significant with I 2 value of 78.36% and the corresponding p-value < 0.0001.

However, the increase in the fitness cost for growth in the biofilm was highly significant ( P < 0.0001 by a two-tailed t test) for streptomycin ( rpsL K42R) and rifampicin ( rpoB S531L) resistance.

The relationship between this calculated projected area (PA) and the true leaf area should diminish over time, as plant architecture and leaf self-shading cannot be corrected from a single photo; however, correlations between average PA and average biomass remained highly significant on day 14 ( r = 0.67; P < 0.0001).

Notably, responses to Question 3, which assessed processed food intake frequency, revealed a highly significant difference between the breast cancer and reproductive system cancer groups (χ 2 = 38.30, p < 0.0001), indicating a marked disparity in reported behaviors between these two populations.

All tests yielded highly significant results, with p -values < 0.0001, providing strong confidence in our findings (Supplementary Table 4).

The difference at 12 weeks was highly significant (P<0.0001) ( Figure S1 ).

Differences comparing MT/MT with WT/WT and WT/WT with Het are highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

5C , polyphosphate concentration had a highly significant effect on surface protein concentration (P < 0.0001), which was directly reflected in the marked increase in EAI across all treatments.

In terms of experiencing stigma related to having AIDS, 111 respondents rated their experiences during the AIDS pandemic as worse than during the COVID pandemic, 20 rated the two pandemics as similar, and only one said COVID was worse: a highly significant result ( p < 0.0001).

The Q test for true heterogeneity was highly significant, Q E (76) = 133.23, p < 0.0001, with estimated variance components of σ 2 Level 3 < 0.001 and σ 2 Level 2 = 0.056.

A pair-comparison analysis (Mann–Whitney) of normal tissue (n = 47) and tumors (n = 573) revealed moderate but highly significant overexpression of LSD1 in tumor specimens ( p < 0.0001; Figure 2 A, left panel).

The percentage reduction from baseline disability scores revealed substantially greater therapeutic efficacy in group B, with a mean reduction of 65.20% with a standard deviation of 14.67% compared to 46.26% with a standard deviation of 18.42% in group A, yielding highly significant differences (t = -4.187; p = 0.0001) and a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.183).

The multivariate logistic regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.54) and showed that all these factors were independent in predicting mortality of sepsis.

Compared to the manual approach of biometric data export and intraocular lens calculation (76.7 ± 12.3 s) as well as the manual export of the reference image to a portable external storage device (26.8 ± 5.5 s), a highly significant saving of time was achieved ( p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant (P < 0.0001) degree of agreement between the education level of fathers and mothers (Cohen κ = 0.50; 95%CI: 0.43–0.57) and similarly between their level of concern (Cohen κ = 0.50; 95%CI: 0.44–0.55).

Highly significant differences were found between sampling sites (χ 2 = 90.42, df = 38, p < 0.0001) and locations (χ 2 = 55.05, df = 18, p < 0.0001).

The results have shown N treatment especially when interacting with H time representing plant age are highly significant ( p < 0.0001) in physiology and phytochemical effect.

The predicted model developed for catechin (Y 1 ) was as follows: Analysis of variance for predicted models implied that the model was highly significant (F-value 20.13, P < 0.0001) with a good coefficient of determination (R 2 = 0.98).

Main results A highly significant difference in survival over time was noted between SADM and MADM patients (p<0.0001), which was intensified by the presence of a CCC.

PGV showed that all SD traits were highly significant ( P <0.0001, Table 1 ) across the O. glaberrima accessions, revealing that SD has a genetic basis.

The split ANOVA revealed a highly significant impact (p<0.0001) between treatments (inoculated and uninoculated), within cultivars as well as interaction ‘Cultivars x Treatments’ effect on brix, pol, fiber, purity, and CSS contents.

The Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that the difference between the high-and low-risk score subgroups was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2F ).

Genotypic effects were highly significant in nearly all environments ( p < 0.0001); the sole exception was 23_WL, where IR was non-significant ( p = 0.0876) and both traits showed low heritability (IR: H 2 = 0.19, h 2 = 0.03; SV: H 2 = 0.27, h 2 = 0.05) (Table 1 ), consistent with uneven disease pressure.

In this study investigating affective disorder patients, there was also a highly significant positive correlation (τ = 0.15, p < 0.0001, n = 788) between the total Hamilton score and the total CTQ-score as we already reported previously [ 27 ].