“highly significant”

Statistical significance was defined as non-significant ( ns P -value >0.05), significant (* P -value ≤0.05), very significant (** P -value ≤0.01), highly significant (*** P -value ≤0.001), and extremely significant (**** P -value ≤0.0001).

The chi-square test showed that there was a highly significant overall change in the pre- and post-test responses ( **** p < 0.0001).

The analysis outlined a three‐factor model of the preliminary 17‐item instrument with notably insufficient fit to the data by a highly significant Satorra–Bentler scaled chi‐square (S‐Bχ2 = 351.40; df = 116 p < .0001) and CFI markedly lower than 0.95 (CFI = 0.798), an excessively high value of SRMR = 0.112, and RMSEA = 0.092 (90% CI = 0.081–0.10).

However, hypomimia and speech impairment from V0 to V24M in males but not in females was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 4 ).

The assays showed a highly significant linear correlation (adjusted r -squared of 0.861, P < 0.0001, Fig. 2B ): for every unit increase in the original assay optical density ratio, the newer assay increased 14 RU/mL (95% CI = 13.1–15.7) units.

Statistical analyses of absolute abundance values showed that 17 of the top-30 differential metabolites by importance were significantly upregulated in the CMPLXL group versus the CMPLXH group compared with the MOD group, and 13 of these differences were highly significant (P < 0.0001) in both comparison groups.

Accordingly, groups diverged following delivery; day of delivery was a highly significant covariate for the PORCH score (p<0·0001), but not for the SOFA score (p=0·09).

Table 1 shows that the choice of the negative binomial distribution was justified, as the dispersion parameter (φ) was highly significant in both models ( p < 0.0001 for both, with Phi for Model 1 = 0.8161).

In the trials Nem19-1 and Nem17-1 eggs per g of root explained 58% of variations in root biomass, and the regression and correlation coefficients were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2 ).

Plant extracts influenced gas production (GP) in a varied way relative to control at both hours of incubation, and GP is consistently highly significant ( p < 0.0001) at 16 and 48 h.

The effects on wound closure at 24 h has shown that LMWHA + Secre and MMWHA+Secre solutions is highly significant ( p < 0.0001) compared to CTR, LMWHA and Secre.

Cox proportional hazards models using splines showed a highly significant relationship between the high probability and high risk of an outcome ( p <0.0001).

This improvement was highly significant across all statistical tests: log-rank χ 2 = 42.12, p < 0.0001; test for trend χ 2 = 51.36, p < 0.0001; Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon χ 2 = 32.99, p < 0.0001.

Also, there is a highly significant correlation between plasma glucose level and erythrocytic glucose content ( Figure 1 K , P < 0.0001).

Fisher’s exact test confirmed highly significant discrimination between patients with early-stage bladder cancer and controls ( p < 0.0001), and the corresponding OR indicated a markedly increased risk of bladder cancer above the cutoff (OR = 53.813, 95% CI 15.167–239.482).

Compared with those in the VSV-GFP control group, expressions of ISG15 and 2′-5′ OAS1 in the IFN-ε and MiIFN-ε-inhibited VSV-GFP groups were significantly increased, and the differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Genotyping of these markers in the FG/FZ strain revealed a highly significant difference in the distribution of genotypes between the dead and alive mosquitoes for all the nets (χ 2 > 20; p < 0.0001) ( Figure S4 ).

This assessment shows in a statistically highly significant manner (p<0.0001) that the use of variant vaccines did not lead to symmetrically optimized protection against homologous VOCs, stressing the asymmetry between virus and neutralizing antibodies.

The highly significant Time × Treatment interaction ( P < 0.0001) shown by a mixed-effects analysis supports the observation that the differences in the respiratory exchange ratio between groups are dependent on the light cycle.

Highly significant correlations (all p < 0.0001) were observed for conUS-EM (r = 0.892), 3DsnUS-MC (r = 0.988), 3DmsUS-MC (r = 0.978), CT-EM (0.956), and CT-MC (0.986), respectively.

In replicated hydroponic experiments showing highly significant differences in seminal root length ( P < 0.0001) between 1RS and 1RW, we analyzed the aerial part of the plants.

Results: Correlation coefficient between the levels of micro/macronutrients obtained by Nutrilog© and Nutricate© software were highly significant ( p = 0.0001) and were well-correlated (R coefficient > 0.6), indicating a very good concordance between the two methods.

The genetic indices based solely on the frequency of the allele MGE7 243 and on the homozygous genotype MGE7 243/243 were strongly associated minSAL, and the models were statistically highly significant ( p < .0001).

Overall, the difference in proportion of symptoms was highly significant: Monte-Carlo-simulated chi-square test, p < 0.0001.

Relationship between PHAS and PHA Patterns, and PHAS Pattern and Morphological Data The association between the PHAS and PHA patterns was highly significant and nearly complete (χ2 = 187.93; df = 20; p < 0.0001; Cramér’s V = 0.94).