SIRIUS follow-up results presented at ACC showed that the highly significant differences (p < 0.0001) between the CYPHER stent and bare metal control stent for all clinical event endpoints were sustained at 3-years.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The analysis of variance showed that Our results in children with neuroblastoma and ganglio- there were highly significant differences between the groups neuroblastoma mirrored those previously reported (Ishiguro (P=0.0001).
3.2 Menopause rating scale and menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire The individual change for the domains (psychological and urogenital) in week 4 was also highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The difference in the face recognition thresholds between DS individuals and TD controls was highly significant ( Z = -4.293, p < 0.0001, two-tailed; effect size, η 2 = 0.45).
In the GAM analysis simultaneously including GH and PE cases ( Figure 3C ), the smooth term of gestational week interacting with maternal log(UA) was highly significant (edf = 5.51, χ2 = 662.3, p < 0.0001).
The spline for child age was highly significant ( χ 2 = 459.23, df = 8, p < 0.0001) and showed a more complex functional form (EDF = 6.95).
Whole leaves on intact branches were cropped on <1% of occasions, but 47% of bites cropped from despined branches removed entire leaves; this was a highly significant difference (Chi‐squared test: X 1 2 = 283.13, p < 0.0001).
The resulting quadratic model was statistically robust (R 2 = 0.874; adjusted R 2 = 0.845; p < 0.0001), with DNA:PEI ratio emerging as the dominant determinant of titre, supported by highly significant linear ( p < 0.0001) and quadratic ( p = 0.00028) terms.
The flow cytometry and OpenCASA viability results were compared using Pearson’s correlation test, and a highly significant correlation (P<0.0001) was obtained for viable and non-viable spermatozoa ( Table 5 ).
The model fit was highly significant, even after Bonferroni correction ( p < 0.0001), for predicting the mean graft survival time after finishing the six-month evaluation period.
Statistically, the differences between T and N are highly significant (P < 0.0001).
There was a highly significant difference between LAP level in compliant and non-compliant patients (1.045 ± 1.270 vs. 0.0785 ± 0.1057 ng/ml, respectively, p value < 0.0001).
Treating cages as replicates, this difference in mating success is highly significant ( t 38 = 5.16, p < 0.0001).
Regarding education attainment, there was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) in the highest degree obtained between PT and SP, detailed further in Table 1 .
Results The results indicated highly significant correlations in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures (MAP) when compared against radial artery catheterization (p<0.0001), and MAP means differed by <4%.
In contrast, the relationship between the human and sloth SPDs is positive and highly significant ( r s = 0.35, P < 0.0001), suggesting those populations fluctuated together from extrinsic factors.
All smooth functions were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
Females with low HDL (61.02%, n=72) were in a larger proportion compared to males (38.98%, n=46), and this difference was highly significant (p<0.0001) (Table 2 ).
The overall model was highly significant, with a model p -value < 0.0001, whereas the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05).
Effect of location and concentration on susceptibility Larvae GLM revealed a highly significant effect of location (L) on the susceptibility of An . gambiae larvae to P . guineense (F 9, 177 = 2441.18 p < 0.0001) and E . aromatica (F 9, 177 = 614.88, p < 0.0001).
}}\, + \,{1}.{75}*{\text{B}}*{\text{C}} - {6}*{\text{A}}^{{2}} - {6}*{\text{ B}}^{{2}} - {3}*{\text{C}}^{{2}}$$\end{document} RNA content = 183.89 + 0.69 ∗ A - 0.98 ∗ B + 0.22 ∗ C + 2.25 ∗ A ∗ B - 0.25 ∗ A ∗ C + 1.75 ∗ B ∗ C - 6 ∗ A 2 - 6 ∗ B 2 - 3 ∗ C 2 ANOVA revealed that the regression model was highly significant, F-value (16.45, P < 0.0001).
For the bivariate associations (controlling for clustering within state) all the associations (tested using design based F-statistic) were highly significant (P < 0.0001) except ownership (public versus private) and region.
Therefore, preliminary statistical analyses were performed for the 45 'clearly classifiable' patients and then confirmed for the whole cohort of all 86 patients. Risk factors for ototoxicity The cumulative dose of cisplatin (DDP) was a highly significant predictor for ototoxicity (P < 0.0001).
3 , are highly significant ( P < 0.0001 by χ 2 analysis).
The inhibition by Lr6127 CFS was highly significant for all three pathogen groups relative to the medium control ( p < 0.0001; Figure 1 A).