“highly significant”

The results showed highly significant correlations between LAC and SUV ( r = 0.586, p < 0.0001) and suggest further investigation of this type of approach for bone density measurement.

Similarly, by week 36, a highly significant reduction of 37.3% was found in the Resmetirom group compared with a decrease of 8.5% in the placebo group ( P < 0.0001).

Analysis of older group An ANOVA on SOA (4 levels) and load (2 levels) revealed highly significant main effects of both SOA [ F (3, 28) = 19.83, p < .0001] and load [ F (1, 30) = 22.73, p < .0001] and a significant interaction between the two [ F (3, 28) = 4.14, p < .01].

While the inhibition was highly significant with all three inhibitors ( p < 0.0001), OP decreased the sialidase activity the greatest and lower than the untreated control ( Figure 2 D,H,I).

The primary endpoint was archived by 53% of the patients in the rhPTH(1-84) group compared with only 2% in the placebo group, which was a highly significant difference ( P <0.0001).

The relationship between fish intake and blood mercury was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Moreover, the OGD/sEVs group showed a highly significant proliferation rate compared with the OGD and OGD/R groups ( p < 0.0001).

For the remaining data, we observed a highly significant effect of interaural correlation on ITD thresholds ( F (1,19) = 30.25, P < 0.0001).

The difference was highly significant with P = 0.0001.

The correlations between these measures are highly significant (Pearson p < 0.0001).

While the reduced number of genes often leads to a loss of significance within each sex, the general results hold whether or not we consider the ancestral level of expression: (i) a highly significant (***P-value < 0.0001) male-biased expression of the Z, with (F:M)Z/(F:M)A ratio from 0.52 to 0.77, is always observed.

This trend was highly significant (P<0.0001), and also significant at each schedule point (Table 2 ).

The P -value after day 11 of the treatment remained highly significant (i.e., p < 0.0001) until all mice treated with control ADC, saline and hRS7 were euthanized ( Figure 7A ).

The difference among the groups was highly significant ( χ 2 : 24.98; P <0.0001) ( Figure 1 ).

Rat control on the farm A highly significant difference (χ 2 = 33.4543 p < 0.0001) was observed in the number of T. gondii positive animals among the properties that use cats for rat control (n = 239; 20 positive animals; prevalence 1.73%) and those that do not use them (n = 885; 12 positive 1 animals; prevalence 1.03%).

Evaluation of Body Weight, Body Mass Index, Visceral, and Subcutaneous Fat Deposits The results in Table 2 show that after 6 weeks of HFD feeding, rats in the groups DC, Metformin 180 mg/kg, AESS 100, AESS 200, and AESS 400 mg/kg showed highly significant (P < .0001) gain in body weight compared to NC animals.

A simple regression of ranks of male participants and female participants in the couples’ group showed a highly significant positive relationship, R = .997, Y = 0.14+0.97, F(1,6) = 105.7, p<.0001, confirming that the preference for the different morphs were nearly identical for both sexes.

However, the ANOVA confirmed a highly significant difference between the groups for all three subdomains ( P < 0.0001 for each) and Cuzick's trend test showed a strong, and highly significant, trend towards lower scores with increasing mEHRA class ( P < 0.0001 for each of the three subdomains).

The cumulative GDD term is highly significant ( t = 74.77, df = 623, P < 0.0001).

A highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001), however, was observed between males and females in the PIVUS cohort.

A highly significant (P < 0.0001) decrease in MWCNT lung burden with post-exposure time was determined.

Summed fluorescence values relative to BF long-latency activity ( Figure 2 c) indicated a highly significant difference across the four groups, illustrating a strong reduction of neuronal assembly magnitude with maturation (F (3,120) = 9.613, p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA).

Highly significant relationships were identified for both parameters ( P <.0001).

When comparing both right and left eye datasets, the column factor (indicating differences between corresponding LA3 versus RoB records) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and the average difference between predicted means was 2.91 ± 0.46 μV for right eyes and 3.0 ± 0.68 μV for left eyes, while the ratio between the predicted means was 1.71 for right eyes and 1.67 for left eyes.

The test for heterogeneity was highly significant [ Q ( df = 34) = 577.47, p < 0.0001].