“highly significant”

The results are statistically highly significant WOMAC osteoarthritis index at V1: (4.24 ± 1.94/6.19 ± 1.79; p < 0.0001, t test and Wilcoxon test), not significant at V2: p = 0.1636, highly significant at V3: p = 0.0009, and significant at V4: p = 0.0123 (Fig. 4 ).

By contrast, viral load was significantly lower under extensive farming conditions, whereas RNA levels in samples from intensive farming practices were markedly elevated, showing a highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001 ).

Statistical analysis of the curves summarized in Figure 2 was done using Prism 5 Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test and the difference between the mutant and wild-type curves was highly significant in all cases with a p-value<0.0001.

The coefficients for an unassigned genus of Bacteriaceae and for the genera Blautia , Dorea , Clostridium , Fusobacterium , Oscillospira , Phascolarctobacterium , Slackia and Streptococcus were highly significant (P<0.0001, S6 Table ).

However, patients with a high FRET efficiency (Fig 4 B) had considerably better survival (highly significant P < .0001) in first-line treatments compared with low FRET patients (median 50% survival still undefined after 50 months for high FRET v 11 months for low FRET patients).

To statistically assess the overlap between the two gene sets, we performed a Fisher’s Exact test, which demonstrated a highly significant concordance (P < 0.0001, two-sided), indicating that the shared transcriptional response is unlikely to occur by chance (Supplementary Table S1 ).

Statistical analysis results ( Table 3 ) Highly significant association resulted statistically for Plaque Urease / Gastric urease (chi-squared = 42.629), which correspond to (P<0.0001).

Human sperm bound specifically to JUNO-beads in a dose- and time-dependent manner, with highly significant differences compared to control beads ( P ≤ 0.0001).

For example, the mean serum creatinine level fluctuates around 95 μmol/l throughout the whole study period, but there is a slight positive (ie, upward) linear trend for males above 75 years, while for women there is a slight negative linear trend for all age categories while the overall linear (very slightly positive) trend is nevertheless highly significant (p<0.0001).

This difference was highly significant ( χ 2 = 23.70, P < 0.0001).

25%, there was a highly significant difference, which was upheld by a χ–square analysis between monoallelic and biallelic expression ( P < 10 −4 ).

Differences between deaths and controls for IL-6 and D-dimer were highly significant ( p < 0.0001); hsCRP was also significantly higher among deaths than controls ( p = 0.005).

3.4 Effects of taurine treatment on retinal macroglial activation The mean RFU of GFAP immunoreactivity was 18,230.56 ± 1,180.26 in untreated RCS rats (n = 11) and 4,729.72 ± 535.17 in taurine-treated RCS rats (n = 8) and this difference was highly significant (p = 0.0001, t -test; Fig. 4 E).

Moreover, by taking into account the normal and intestinal metaplasia tissue to examine TF expression along the gastric MACS, the increasing trend was shown to be highly significant in both approaches; P <0.0001 by JTOM for both I s and I m scales ( Figure 2 ).

Finally, as in our gene-expression data, we observed highly significant correlations between the intra-tumoral cell counts of the myeloid and main (T, B or NK cells) lymphoid subset ( Figure 3 j-o, p < .0001).

Strong and highly significant positive correlations were observed between IVS volume and both gestational age (Pearson’s r = 0.891, p < 0.0001; Spearman’s ρ = 0.920, p < 0.0001) as well as estimated fetal weight (Pearson’s r = 0.860, p < 0.0001; Spearman’s ρ = 0.927, p < 0.0001).

In GLMs with male intensity as dependent variable, and female intensity, chromosome type (Z or autosomal) and the interaction term as independent variables, the interaction term was highly significant (zebra finch: p<0.0001, Table 1 ; common whitethroat: p<0.0001, Table 2 ).

(2022) found no significant differences in input resistance and spike width between Calb2 and Chrna2 cells, whereas we found highly significant differences in these parameters ( p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01, respectively, in pairwise comparisons), and also in the initial firing frequency and adaptation ratio (Extended Data Fig. 9-1 ).

Based on analysis of variance (ANOVA), for both labs a highly significant effect of experimental day was found ( P < 0.0001), whereas no differences ( P > 0.48) were found for homeopathic treatment {preparation B/G}, nor for the internal replicates {1/2/3}, nor any interaction.

Moreover, a highly significant difference in ATF6 expression was observed between diabetic females and males in this region ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4 c).

Variance analyses (data not shown) confirmed great variability among RILs shown by highly significant values of F tests (F value 3.9, 2.4 and 1.82, p <0.0001 for dry and wet seasons and greenhouse experiments, respectively).

Analysis of the expression of EBV-miR-BART22 by MiRNA qRT-PCR revealed highly significant differences between the EBV carrier group and EBV-HLH and CAEBV groups (P < 0.0001; P < 0.001), and significant differences between the IM and EBV-HLH groups (P < 0.001).

Comparing the survival rates of patients with different histopathological tumor gradings showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 ).

On comparison of Intrastromal TIL with the clinicopathological features, it was recognised that at the 95% Confidence Interval as shown in Table 2 - There was a significant association of age (p = 0.0147) with the intrastromal TIL count followed by a highly significant association found with the HRBC subtype (p < 0.0001), TNBC subtype (p < 0.0001) and HER2BC subtype (p = 0.0025).

Similarly, the relationship between airway resistance and airflow into the lungs was highly significant, following a logarithmic curve (p<0.0001; Fig. 1C ).