Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Y 1 = 6.119 + 1.815 A - 4 .626B - 18 .608C + 0.436AB + 0.580AC - 0 .887BC - 0 .633A 2 + 3.269 B 2 + 15.650 C 2 Y 2 = 18.883 + 13.360 A + 49.779B - 186 .192C - 9 .063AB + 7.010AC - 24 .790BC - 3 .289A 2 - 13.194 B 2 + 150.865 C 2 The yield model (Y 1 ) had an F-value of 105.270, indicating highly significant level differences ( p < 0.0001).
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
M+F+A− genes were also significantly overrepresented on the X at a 2-fold expression threshold ( f (X) = 0.26, p = 0.03), and at larger thresholds the effect became highly significant, the frequency of X-linkage reaching 0.50 ( p = 0.0001) and 0.57 ( p = 0.0002) for 5- and 10-fold overexpressed genes, respectively.
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The Wilks’ lambda value of 0.093 was highly significant ( F (12,96) = 18.2, p = 0.0001), supporting the hypothesis that the examined individuals could be assembled in three morphological groups; the analysis also showed that the individuals were appropriately classified inside the corresponding group.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The study revealed a highly significant reduction in the rate of major cardiovascular events with descending levels of LDL-cholesterol ( p < 0.0001) with a decrease of 22 percent in combined cardiovascular end point (including coronary artery disease, nonfatal MI, and resuscitated cardiac arrest and a reduction of 20 percent in cardiac deaths with lower LDL levels) [ 24 ].
highly significantP = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
By contrast, intergroup comparisons revealed that the differences between groups A and B regarding LTP and neurogenesis were consistently highly significant (LTP, t test, P = 0.0001; chi-square test, P = 0.0028; neurogenesis, t test, P = 0.0002; chi-square test, P = 0.006) confirming that the patterns are indeed different.