Findings A highly significant correlation between Hounsfield units and trabecular bone mineral density was detected ( r = 0.93; P < 0.0001), and local bone density was significantly increased in the anterior and posterior area ( P = 0.0003).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
3 a): A one-way ANOVA showed a highly significant between-groups difference ( F (4,55) = 10.32; p = 0.0001).
MBP showed a highly significant ( P > 0.0001) increase in CSF of PHH and SB/HC infants compared to normal.
ELISA results showed that the Giardia induced a highly significant increase in the secretion of IL-6, IL-12 p40 and TNF-α compared to the control group (IL-6: ANOVA, F (4, 10) = 1.116, p < 0.0001; IL-12 p40: ANOVA, F (4, 10) = 0.6885, p < 0.0001; TNF-α: ANOVA, F (4, 10) = 1.990, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2 a–c).
Importantly, multivariable Cox analysis demonstrated that CCNF remained a highly significant predictor of OS independently of histologic grade and TNM stage (HR 2.86, 95% CI 2.02–4.06, p < 0.0001; Table 4 ).
The tests of zero amplitude were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for every HRV variable, clearly suggesting a significant circadian variation.
As shown in Table 3 , the model was highly significant (P < 0.0001)and statistically significant.
The association of each of the cytological grading systems and the histological grading by SBR method was found to be highly significant with a P < 0.0001 as measured by Chi-square test.
Although differentiation among subgroups was highly significant (P<0.0001), 76.95% of total genetic variance was attributed to the difference within subgroups and 1.51% within individuals.
The diminution seen was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) as determined by paired Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.
Distal femora from young adult ptx3 −/− females (10–12 weeks old) on B6 background showed highly significant decrease in trabecular bone volume ( p < 0.0001), which was paralleled by decreased trabecular number and trabecular thickness, as well as increased trabecular separation compared to ptx3 +/+ mice (Figure 1 ).
In each subject the proportion of variance explained was superior in the non-shuffled data and this difference was highly significant (Wilcoxon signed rank test, all p values <.0001).
The resulting linear regression equation, optimized for Amemiya Prediction Criterion, is highly significant (correlation coefficient = 0.787, r - 2 = 0.606 , P<0.0001, α = 0.05, see Fig 14 ).
The average parasitism of both pupal parasitoid species on all host ages showed a highly significant difference ( F 1.78 = 27.74, P < 0.0001; Table 2 ).
Tukey's multiple comparison test revealed highly significant differences in antimony susceptibility between Leishmania species (p value <0.0001).
Highly significant ( P < 0.0001) differences in susceptibilities to the disease were detected among the evaluated germplasm.
The difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), although PASI scores were often low.
With respect to X 0 , all variables were highly significant (P < 0.0001) and were therefore included in the final model (detailed in Supplementary information: model outputs).
A t -test for correlated samples confirmed a highly significant mean decrease of 37.77 points ( P < 0.0001).
After log transformation and analysis of variance, the difference in initial NfL levels between the three groups was highly significant ( F = 25.83, p < 0.0001).
Also, 77.5% of the isolates were capable of forming biofilms and a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.0001) was found between biofilm formation and multidrug resistance.
The difference between NK cell cytotoxicity from patients (samples were taken before therapy) and healthy donors was highly significant ( P = 0.0001).
A highly significant difference in the surface roughness for the TiT group in compare to the TiM and Zr groups for all parameters ( p < 0.0001). 3.2.
The overall model was highly significant ( R 2 = 0.641, F = 19.15, p < 0.0001).
At P90, 10 out of 10 eyes injected with the 150 K dose showed highly significant ONL preservation in the temporal region ( ~ 6 nuclei) compared to the untreated nasal region ( ~ 2 nuclei) ( p -value < 0.0001).