“highly significant”

The apparent 10.2/7.6 mmHg difference between inpatients and outpatients was only slightly reduced to 8.0/5.1 mmHg after adjustment for baseline and remained highly significant (p < 0.0001/p < 0.0001) even after correction for cluster effects.

As expected, the data from sequencing 93 amplicons revealed a highly significant correlation of the mean coverage and minimum coverage ( r = 0.8792; p < 0.0001).

The test confirmed highly significant separation (global log-rank p < 0.0001).

The interaction terms for birth year and area of residence (rural/urban) aged 10–12 years were highly significant for both men and women (p<0.0001).

This prognostic significance remained highly significant in both uni- and multi-variate analyses (HR: 0.14; CIs: 0.06-0.33; P <0.0001), emphasizing OMD status as a robust and independent positive predictor of survival in patients with metastatic colon cancer.

For MSP2-3D7, the different methods of coupling resulted in highly significant differences in antibody-binding affinities (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons, except between N- and C-terminal His-tagged couplings where no difference could be seen).

subquinaria revealed a highly significant effect of population type (sympatric versus allopatric; Wald χ 2 = 17.88, p < 0.0001), but no effect of individual population within population type (χ 2 = 1.02, p = 0.91) or trial (χ 2 = 2.12, p = 0.35).

Although risk group classification was highly significant on univariate analysis (p=0.0001; worsened outcome with increased risk group), this finding disappeared on multivariable analysis.

This perfectly matches ANOVA table, where D had the highest F-value (486.64) and was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). pH is the next major contributing factor.

The estimated EPSPS gene copy number ratios between ApR and ApS were highly significant (p < 0.0001) at 9.1 and 8.7 when normalised to the ALS and CPS genes, respectively ( Table 2 ).

The diminution seen was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) as determined by paired Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.

Gel and capillary electrophoresis correlate well for estimating the concentration of the five serum protein fractions When the serum total protein concentration was entered into Phoresis software and then used to calculate the individual protein fractions, we obtained a highly significant (p < 0.0001) correlation between the gel and capillary electrophoresis values.

A Wilcoxon test showed a highly significant decrease of CMT from baseline (473 ± 196 μm) to month 1–3 (371 ± 163) ( p < 0.0001).

There is no consensus on how p-values should be estimated for linear mixed models, but following the t-statistics obtained from using the Satterthwaite’s method, the effect of the participant’s role (whether proposer or recipient) was highly significant (p < 0.0001) whereas the effect of the depression diagnosis and the role:depression interaction were not.

The results confirmed a highly significant monotonic decrease in the self-generated preparatory advantage from the first to the final move ( p < 0.0001; cluster mass = −1,779.65; −1,000 to +495 ms), indicating that preparatory activity became progressively less self-specific as the sequence unfolded ( Fig. 3 , right panel).

Results In all postoperative assessments, there was significant improvement in the grade of dysphonia ( p < 0.004) and highly significant reduction in the size of glottic gap and prolongation of maximum phonation time ( p < 0.0001).

Similarly, 58.6% (n = 17) of the controls had normal IGF levels in comparison with only 5.9% (n = 1) of the cases with normal IGF levels and was found to be highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

At the level of Ct values of our extraction methods, a highly significant, very strong positive correlation was demonstrated between the miRNeasy kit and the TRIzol and Universal kits (miRNeasy/Universal p < 0.0001, r = 0.980; TRIzol/miRNeasy p < 0.0001 r = 0.959), and a highly significant, very strong positive correlation was found between the TRIzol and Universal kits (TRIzol/Universal p = <0.0001, r = 0.965) ( Figure 3 ). 3.2.

The differences where highly significant in the Wilcoxon test (z = - 3.79; p < 0.0001).

81 [23–103] days) the difference being highly significant after adjusting by symptoms and controlling for multiple episodes in individuals ( p < .0001, shared‐frailty Cox model).

The separation in the survival distributions for those with perfusion defects and those without perfusion defects was highly significant (log-rank p = 0.0001).

β -carotene was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) in all extracts, especially in comparison to the MET vs CHL extracts.

1 X 2 2 − 4.27 X 3 2 − 4.82 X 4 2 − 6.24 X 1 X 2 + 0.8271 X 1 X 3 − 1.51 X 1 X 4 − 2.48 X 2 X 3 − 1.58 X 2 X 4 + 0.0910 X 3 X 4 + 2.15 X 1 + 6.65 X 2 − 2.00 X 3 + 0.7997 X 4 + 80.28 The regression analysis of variance (ANOVA) results (Supplementary Table 2 ) demonstrate that the regression model is highly significant ( P < 0.0001), confirming its reliability.

The differences between baseline and each time point (12, 24, and 36 months) were highly significant (p < .0001), and the differences between the time intervals (12–24 months, 12–36 months, and 24–36 months) were also significant (p < .0001).

Importantly, this relationship remained highly significant in the time-adjusted model (β = 0.000177, 95% CI: 0.000113–0.000242, F = 29.8, p < 0.0001), indicating that the structure-function correlation persists even after controlling for temporal changes during the recovery process.