“highly significant”

All the detergents have shown highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) from native in PD, although no significant variation among each other ( p > 0.998).

LACE score was highly significant as a predictor of readmission (p<0.0001), with an AUC of 0.773 (95% CI 0.768 to 0.779) and R 2 of 0.180.

Results There is a highly significant decrease ( P = 0.0001) in the serum levels of IgG, IgG/IgM ratio, and serum albumin in the patient groups compared with the control group as shown in Table 1 .

In these additional analyses, the difference in GCV frequencies between WT and PARP−/− cells at the IgL locus remains highly significant ( p <.0001 and p = .0006, respectively), although the number of mutations scored at the less well defined IgH locus was not sufficient to reveal a significant difference in these more conservative analyses ( p = .1023 and p = .1280, respectively).

Expression of Bax and caspase-9 genes revealed a highly significant increase in cancer cell lines ( p = 0.0001) when compared to the control group.

To compare multiple independent groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used, which showed highly significant statistical differences ( p < 0.0001) for all the kinetic and morphological parameters studied.

The results of the regression and variance analysis indicated that the regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05), suggesting a good model fit.

The linear correlations of L ↓ and K ↓ with T are highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for all the five reanalysis products.

This was confirmed by comparing the intersample dissimilarities between samples, which were larger for the data sets from acidified soil and were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.0001) (see Fig.

The mean of the difference was highly significant below zero (t = -8.6812, df = 224, p < 0.0001), thus patients’ relationship with their own voice improved significantly during the stay (95%-CI of the mean difference: -0.48 to -0.30).

Notably, the genetic correlations between DB, EH, IS, OB, and HC with CKD were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), indicating that these diseases may have a stronger association with CKD due to a shared genetic basis.

The test revealed a highly significant effect ( P = 0.0001) of elevation on the community structure of mayflies, explaining 15.6% of the variance in species composition across the 31 sampled sites (Supplementary Table S2 ).

Interaction tests From the MMRM, baseline reversibility was found to be a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) covariate on trough FEV 1 .

All agreement statistics were highly significant (p<0.0001).

The differences in the means of well-being for the sets in the creative-reliable (0.87 ± 0.21), organized-reliable (0.23 ± 0.012), and emotional-unreliable (0.022 ± 0.030) networks were highly significant (One-Way ANOVA, F = 7388.04, df = 2, p < 0.0001).

A two-way ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of RVT ( p < 0.0001).

We are the first to report on a highly significant association between HER2 overexpression and/or amplification and the p53abn molecular subgroup ( p < 0.0001) with 95.8% of HER2-positive EC classified in the p53abn subgroup in the PORTEC-3 HREC.

Effects of miR-485 on NOI were highly significant by one-way ANOVA ( F 4,25 = 26.15, p < 0.0001).

Dropping out and psychological consultation due to burnout showed highly significant associations with all burnout dimensions (p < 0.0001).

Except for lung cancer, there are strong and highly significant trends of increasing cancer risk with increasing height ( P < 0.0001 for colorectal cancer, malignant melanoma, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and other cancers and P = 0.002 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma).

The pairwise comparisons between concentrations in front of and behind the filter unit revealed highly significant differences for all microbiological parameters ( p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test).

For IgG antibody, the differences in Abs between control sera negative for SARS-CoV-2 antibody and sera positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibody were highly significant for all antigens, as shown by their p values ( p < 0.0001).

nose position in HC and TC (Figures 3C,D ) indicated highly significant body posture differences (slope differences: U = 143; P < 0.0001) in shocked vs. non-shocked mice in the first 15 min after reopening the door (Figure 3E ).

“In-within” multiple comparisons determined that this increase in AGO1 during reactivation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) compared to levels of AGO1 during latency (Fig. 7 a, right).

The multiple logistic model, in overall, was highly significant (p<0.0001).