“highly significant”

Correlation between AIM and ICS methods was highly significant for both spike-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T cells ( P < 0.0001) (fig.

As shown in Figure 1 , the mean of PAB values in SLE patients (147.3 ± 42 HK) was higher than the healthy group (84.8 ± 32.2 HK) and it was highly significant statistically ( P < 0.0001).

pombe spores irradiated at the same level; the differences being highly significant (p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 1B ).

Visual outcome There was highly significant statistical difference between preoperative and postoperative visual acuity in group 1 ( P =0.0001), group 2 ( P =0.001), group 3 ( P =0.003), and group 4 ( P =0.002).

This pattern was again highly significant (r = 0.770, r 2 = 0.593, p < 0.0001).

The statistical difference between IDH- m/w groups (Table 2 ) using Mann Whitney test was highly significant for KYN ( P < 0.0001), NLR ( P = 0.0002), TIMP-1 ( P = 0.0405) and hTERT ( P < 0.0001).

Type × vertical position association Cross-tabulation analysis revealed a highly significant association between primary type and vertical position (χ2 = 33.574, df = 4, p < 0.0001).

Statistical significance was defined as non-significant ( ns P -value >0.05), significant (* P -value ≤0.05), very significant (** P -value ≤0.01), highly significant (*** P -value ≤0.001), and extremely significant (**** P -value ≤0.0001).

Pulmonary function variables showed a highly significant linear correlation between baseline and bracing ( p < 0.0001, except for the FEV1/FVC ratio ( p = 0.0054)).

The mean [SD] of NAFLD mark studied groups was 1.38 [0.13]; 1.85 [0.25] for healthy individuals, NAFLD with highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001).

Such an increase was slight due to the small size of malignant lesions but was highly significant in most experiments (e.g., in the AT-3 model at day 9 post-implantation, P < 0.0001; in the 4T1 model at day 9 post-implantation, P = 0.0029).

Correlation of VOE Score with Plasma Concentration of 12-HETE, TNF-alpha and IL-1β There was a strong and highly significant direct correlation between vaso-occlusive events score and plasma concentration of the pro-inflammatory molecule 12-HETE (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001), Table 3 .

The difference with control cells was highly significant (one-tailed Fisher’s exact test, p<0.0001).

Both the model based on Ad26.COV2.S and the model based on all vaccine candidates have highly significant slopes ( p < 0.0001) in the nose.

Analysis with ANOVA indicated a highly significant difference in parasitic numbers between any of the treated groups and the control group (F = 158.81; P = 0.0001).

The difference between the mean radiation-induced G2 scores for 0.05 Gy compared to 0.5 Gy in this cohort were highly significant (two-tailed p value < 0.0001) by the Mann–Whitney test and this is also illustrated in Figure 1 for both doses in the healthy control donors.

Statistical analysis showed highly significant positive correlation between the MVMO (Increase mouth opening) and DDR, Disk Degeeneration, Pseudo disk formation ( P < 0.0001).

The ANOVA results ( Table ) for the quadratic model evaluating the adsorption capacity of SiNH 2 @FeNP-MK demonstrate that the model is highly significant ( P < 0.0001), with an F -value of 47.56.

Similarly, the onset of motor block was earlier in Group R5 (20.7 ± 1.5 minutes) than in Group R75 (21.9 ± 1.2 minutes), which was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

We stratified analyses by sex as it was a highly significant effect modifier (p<0·0001).

The p -values for all of the analyses were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.0001).

Demographics predictor for practice score was highly significant for age ( p =.0001) and BMI ( p =.0001).

Human sperm bound specifically to JUNO-beads in a dose- and time-dependent manner, with highly significant differences compared to control beads ( P ≤ 0.0001).

The statistical analyses show that quadratic models fit very well into the data for the response and the responses were highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The impact of measurement time on USCL changes in the 2nd cohort comparisons was highly significant (p < 0.0001).