“highly significant”

Control and riboflavin-supplemented samples showed a highly significant positive correlation (r 2 = 0.99; p < 0.0001) according to the global expression correlation analysis ( Figure 5a ).

For all immunological outcomes, the interaction term between groups*visits were highly significant (p<0.0001); suggesting significant variation in antibody kinetics between groups.

There was a highly significant effect of suggestion ( F 2,312 = 585.8; p < .0001), a marginally significant effect of hypnosis ( F 1,312 = 3.6; p = .060) and no significant effect of group ( F 1,312 = 2.6; p = .11).

n = 508, 53.0%); this was a highly significant difference ( P <0.0001).

In subjects 6–55 years of age, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of severe disease in the presence of S pneumoniae was highly significant ( P = 0·0001).

The diminution seen was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) as determined by paired Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.

ANOVA RM showed there was no effect of Day ( F (4, 20) = 0.248, p = 0.908) or Day*Trial interaction ( F (12, 60) = 0.788, p = 0.661), but a highly significant main effect of Trial ( F (3, 15) = 17.73, p < 0.0001), upon the slope.

The results in Table 7 demonstrate a highly significant difference among algorithms ( P <0.0001), substantiating the robustness of bDTOPRS in feature selection.

For the WAI values of the bean flours, there are highly significant differences between pretreatments and particle sizes ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 1(a) ), as well as significant interactions between both factors ( p < 0.05).

The association between continuous NLR and breast cancer remained highly significant across all models, with ORs of 8.39 (95% CI: 4.40, 16.02, P < 0.0001) in the unadjusted model, 8.08 (95% CI: 4.15, 15.73, P < 0.0001) in the partially adjusted model, and 7.69 (95% CI: 3.72, 15.92, P < 0.0001) in the fully adjusted model.

The linear regressions on age were all very highly significant ( P < 0.0001), accounting for a minimum of 61% of the variance.

Despite the cifA and cifB genes frequently transferring between distantly related arthropods, there is a highly significant tendency for closely related cif genes to be found in the same host order (Mantel test comparing cifA–cifB pairwise distances and insect orders: P -value < 0.0001; supplementary fig.

When scores were evaluated, non-parametric ANOVA yielded a highly significant difference among groups (P<0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test) ( Fig. 1C ).

Results Similar MIC interpretations for tetracycline, erythromycin, and ciprofloxacin were found in 97%, 98.5%, and 100% of the isolates, respectively, indicating a good level of agreement between Etest and Sensititre ( p < 0.0001); additionally, the correlation between the two methods was highly significant for the three tested antibiotics ( p < 0.0001).

UUCRs and PUCs showed a highly significant positive correlation when all samples were compared ( p < 0.0001), with ρ = 0.72 (Fig. 4 ).

After 48 h further prolonged and highly significant PDGF levels were observed (ODN: 470%, p < 0.0001 and ODN + HMGB1: 522%, p < 0.0001 respectively).

There was a highly significant correlation between plasma exposure of MIV-711 and effects on bone resorption ( p < 0.0001, Pearson correlation, r 2 = 0.71).

One highly significant cluster with a relative risk (RR) of 4.7(p<0.0001) included 32 hamlets and 27 cases in 33,609 population.

Repeated measures ANOVA showed that there was a highly significant interaction between acupuncture mode (verum vs. sham) and time (across all three treatment sessions) for rACC/MPFC Fisher Z values [F(2,27) = 13.403, p < 0.0001].

2B ), and the difference in the combined numbers of autophagosome and autolysosome vesicles, as an indicator of autophagosome formation, was highly significant ( F (1,23) = 105.52, p < 0.0001, Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig.

The proportional difference is highly significant (χ 2 (d.f. = 1) = 18.18, P < 0.0001) and is line with other national and international findings that COVID-19-associated death is more likely in older men than older women.

Nevertheless, we observed a highly significant difference in the mean daily number of ESBs present in the UVDs ( P < 0.0001), determined by data from the time points sampled over the full day—insects kept under the shorter photoperiod had significantly more ESBs in their vasa deferentia ( Fig. 3F ).

The improvement between the HLA-only model and the models with HLA plus GRS was statistically highly significant (p=0.0001).

There was a highly significant relationship between reduction in ESV and SDI (P<0.0001) as well as a greater than 15% improvement in EF and SDI (P<0.0001) (see figure 1 and table 1 ).

The change in summary score over the period of follow-up was highly significant, the mean LDD summary score at baseline versus follow-up 12.96 versus 22.97 (p<0.0001).