“highly significant”

General combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) effects were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) for all traits.

P ‐value was reported as * p < 0.05 considered statistically significant, ** p < 0.01 considered highly significant, and *** p < 0.0001 very highly significant.

ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of condition. with maximum in the lower gamma range at 30–45 Hz (p<0.0001, Fig. 3 ).

After imputing missing studies in the funnel plot, adjustment of effect size for possible publication bias using the trim-and-fill correction results in decreased, albeit still highly significant estimate of pooled mean difference (adjusted = −0.36 logMAR; 95% CI: −0.44; −0.28; p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant difference between CS and CHF patients in changes (OUT-IN) in the Barthel Index (P<0.0001).

All measures of associations are highly significant ( p < 0.0001), between overcrowded housing and four COVID-19 related outcomes.

The high-fat meal produced a decline after 4 weeks of placebo [ - 12.37% ( P = .005)], but no decline after 4 weeks of flavonoid supplement [ - 3.16% ( P = .663)], and the difference between the two responses was highly significant ( P < .0001).

Mettl5 and Mettl3 exhibited a similar expression pattern, peaking on Day 1 with highly significant upregulation ( p < 0.0001).

A highly significant interaction term between time and group was found (p<0.0001) revealing a statistically significant different evolution of the 6MWD for intervention and control groups ( figure 2 ).

A statistically highly significant association between HSV-2 seropositivity and increasing parity was found ( P = 0.0001). 1.38% of primiparous females and 25.64% of multiparous females tested positive.

All correlations are highly significant (p<0,0001***, Spearman).

A highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001, effect size = 0.319) is observed between protein–protein (Peptide = 0) and protein–peptide (Peptide = 1) complexes ( Figure 1 b), with a noticeably lower median affinity for the latter.

The left (not surgically destabilized) and the right (surgically destabilized) knee joints of the rats were highly significant different ( p < 0.0001) when comparing all animals of both groups (treated with dPGS or not).

Two-way ANOVA with dose and exposure time as main factors yielded a highly significant main effect of concentration (F = 30.99, p < 0.0001), and a small effect of exposure time (F = 3.06, p = 0.0828), but the interaction term was highly significant (F = 4.5, p = 0.0009).

For the SIADH/cancer subgroup, subjects on tolvaptan exhibited a highly significant improvement in this parameter ( P < 0.0001) relative to placebo to day 4 (5.0 vs. −0.3 mEq/mL) and to day 30 (6.9 vs. 1.0 mEq/L) (Fig. 2 ).

All vaccinated groups showed 0% mortality when challenged, which was highly significant compared to the non-vaccinated controls (40 and 28% mortality eight and twenty-six weeks post vaccination (wpv), respectively) (P<0.0001).

However, according to LDMs including data from all study time points, there were highly significant differences in microbiota composition ( p = 0.0001) across the study period.

All of the observed differences in entropy were found to be highly significant, with none of the permuted networks having an average entropy value greater than that of the real one, indicating a confidence of at least p < 0.0001.

Superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and catalase activities were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) in the treatment groups compared to the control.

CD8 and Foxp3 expression also demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation (R 2 =0.27; P<0.0001).

As shown, the models were overall highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with no significant lack of fit ( p > 0.05).

After adjustment for multiple factors, margin width was a more highly significant predictor of IBTR ( P < .0001). 22 The MP felt that, overall, the heterogeneity of the evidence between the above-reported studies did not allow for a definitive recommendation for margin widths greater than 2 mm in patients foregoing RT.

Population expansions appear to have been more prominent in the southern part of the distribution, with highly significant negative F s values for the Gulf Coast ( F s = −24.98, p < 0.0001), and West Florida ( F s = −13.5, p < 0.0001), and with localities such as Cedar Key (CKFL) and Apalachicola (APFL) representing clear examples.

The difference in work-up result between referred and non-referred subjects was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The mean anesthesia time was significantly shorter in the WALANT group, averaging 3.6 ± 0.5 minutes (95% CI 3.44-3.76), compared with 8.4 ± 2.0 minutes in the LRA group (95% CI 7.61-9.19), demonstrating a highly significant difference ( P < .0001).