“highly significant”

In the analysis of variation among the frequencies in each ear alone, we noticed that it was highly significant (p<0.0001-t Student test) in all the frequencies for both the right and the left ears.

Figure 5 a shows the correlation between the CMB count in the whole brain detected by experts and the SHIVA-CMB in the 1992 T2*GRE scans of the MEMENTO participants, demonstrating the highly significant correlation ( Pearson’s R = 0.89, p < 0.0001) and a regression slope close to 1.

There was a significant difference between farm and slaughterhouse samples, with farm samples showing higher IgG levels ( p = 0.0074) in pigs with a pleurisy score of 1, and the differences were highly significant, with p -values < 0.0001, indicating much higher IgG levels in farm samples compared to slaughterhouse samples in pigs classified with the most severe pleurisy scores of 3 and 4 ( Figure 2 ). 3.7.

The model is highly significant (F-statistic p -value < 0.0001), and the RMSE values suggest reasonable predictive accuracy.

For the entire study group, this resulted in a highly significant estimate ( F (2.37)=25.4, p<0.0001, R 2 =0.578).

This is supported by their highly significant levels observed in both A549 cells ( P adjust < 0.0001 for both FAM83A and GPR37 genes in Table 4 ) and LUAD patients ( P < 0.0001 for both FAM83A and GPR37 genes in Fig. 5 a).

Three-way interactions were highly significant (p < 0.0001).

However, it had a highly significant effect on malnutrition risk (b = 0.6378, t = 6.6145, p < 0.0001) A summary of the mediation analysis is provided in Table 6 and Figure 1 .

FAS), we observed a marked and highly significant impairment of vascular function in the HFrD groups compared to their non-HFrD counterparts ( p < 0.0001 for all comparisons).

The regression coefficient associated with the number of trials between repetitions was negative and highly significant (p<0.0001; t-test, Equation 8 ).

This at some points would also clarify how the statistics were computed exactly (e.g., "All subjects showed comparable difference and the difference in medians evaluated across subjects was highly significant (p<<0.0001).", p.10, is ambiguous to me).

However, a highly significant and strong correlation ( p < 0.0001) was found between the number of nuclei per OC and the percent eroded surface per bone surface in vitro ( Figure 4 b).

The analysis of the two-sample t -test has revealed significant deviations in run length, velocity, and off rate at higher and lower pH levels relative to the neutral pH of 6.9, with a highly significant probability ( p < 0.0001).

Results: Data analysis shows that sleep quality (t = 33.35) ( P = 0.0000) and mental ability (t = 35.33) ( P = 0.0001) are both highly significant at P =0.0001.

0153), becoming highly significant at the end of the diet ( p < 0.0001; Figure 1A ).

The model F-value of 178.56 indicated that the model was highly significant at p < 0.0001.

parasuis field isolates, a highly significant protection was conferred by the vaccination in the survival rate ( p < 0.0001), regardless of G. parasuis TbpB cluster and SV, since all non-immunized piglets died within the initial three days post-infection (dpi) (Table 2 ).

The a priori defined primary pharmacodynamic outcome of an increase in the frequency of Tregs as a percentage of CD4 + T-lymphocytes at D8 was dose-dependent (JT-J test, p < 0.0001) and highly significant for both treated arms (MW-U test, p < 0·0001; 2 MIU: mean [SD]: +6·2% [2·2]; 1 MIU: mean [SD]: +3·9% [1·2]) as compared to placebo (mean [SD]: −0·5% [1·3]) (see Table 3 , Fig. 2 a and b).

The father-offspring correlation was highly significant (P < 0.0001), in contrast to mother-offspring (P < 0.361).

In the present study, MDA levels were much higher in individuals with PCOS (0.71±0.13) than in those without PCOS (0.41±0.14) and the data was highly significant (p=0.0001).

However, in Figure 6I, there is a highly significant difference in the number of HNF4A positive cells, more than a 3-fold percentage difference, with a p-value of <0.0001.

High correlation values were evident, with Spearman coefficients of 0.947 for gait speed and 0.989 for stride length, both highly significant ( p < 0.0001) as demonstrated in Figure 7 and Figure 8 .

Generally, a p -value less than 0.05 indicates that the corresponding factor is significant. Therefore, the quadratic polynomial model established in this experiment is highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 55 The model’s R 2 is 0.9757, and the adjusted R 2 is 0.9514, indicating a good fit with minimal experimental error.

There were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) associations between the abnormal expression of E-cadherin and Vimentin, E-cadherin and β-catenin, Vimentin and β-catenin, SMAD4 and E-cadherin, and a significant association between SMAD4 and Vimentin ( p = 0.0003), and SMAD4 and β-catenin ( p = 0.001) as shown in Table 1 .

This model explains more than 50% of the data variance (R 2 marginal = 48.3%; R 2 conditional = 53.3%) and shows a highly significant effect of the colour of the lights ( p -value < 0.0001, Estimate = 0.41) with red lights prompting the answer “warmer” and blue lights prompting the answer “colder” (Fig. 4 ).