“highly significant”

There was a highly significant treatment × week interaction on the number of floor eggs produced (F(11,466) = 3.75, p < 0.0001), suggesting that the effect of treatment differed across weeks, and the LSMeans and Standard error for treatment × week interaction are reported in Table 3 and Figure 9 .

There was high heterogeneity among the studies, as indicated by the I 2 value of 85.8 % and a highly significant p-value (p < 0.0001).

The results revealed a highly significant correlation between the MRP and N-myc expression (r=0.795, P<0.0001), and no involvement of the expression of these genes in the prognosis of the patient.

Both of the main effects, sample and clone, are highly significant (both P < 0.0001).

Diagnostic potential of miR-363 According to ROC curve analysis, miR-363 covered a highly significant ( P <0.0001) area in both PCa tissue (0.969; sensitivity: 85%; specificity 100%) as well as serum (0.988; sensitivity: 97.5%; specificity: 87.5%) ( Fig. 3A & B).

The association with pN-category was highly significant ( p < 0.0001); the percentage of cases with ECG doubled from category pN1 to pN2 and tripled from pN1 to pN3 (pN1: n = 89, ECG 19%; pN2: n = 59, ECG = 41%; pN3: n = 51, ECG = 63%).

Our analysis revealed a total of 447 significant SNPs across the pearl millet genome associated with primary root growth from which, 109 SNPs were found highly significant with at least two other methods for association analysis at p-value <10 −4 ( Supplementary file 1 , Table S2).

This difference in maximum lodscores was highly significant (p < 0.0001), implying that the effect of this chromosome may vary with age.

The increases in sub G1 in the 5-FU plus ATRA treated cells, when compared to cells treated with 5-FU alone, were highly significant (P<0.0001).

The paired t-test values between NZ and SC are highly significant for Olsen P t (1, 19) 5.45, p < 0.0001; Total N t (1, 19) 4.73, p < 0.0001, and pH t (1, 19) -18.4, p < 0.0001 respectively.

Normality and Distributional Diagnostics Every impedance trait produced highly significant p -values ( p < 0.0001), rejecting the null hypothesis of equivalence.

This revealed a highly significant interaction [ F (4,240) = 26.42, P < .0001], indicating that the lateralization of shared processing depends on frequency band ( Fig. 2 ).

A similar pattern was observed at 4 Gy, where an acute increase occurred at 4 h, followed by a highly significant peak at 24 h ( P < 0.0001) and a substantial reduction by 48 h.

The Q -statistic remained highly significant, with a p -value < 0.0001, indicating substantial heterogeneity.

All dimensions of the SSQ12 questionnaire (Speech, Spatial, Qualities of Hearing, and overall score) revealed highly significant subjective benefit ( p < 0.0001).

A marked and significant increase in cell viability was observed at 100 and 250 μg mL −1 (117.4% and 114%), showing a highly significant enhancement compared with control ( p < 0.0001) and ( p < 0.001) respectively.

Conversely, highly significant differences were observed comparing NMRs between the LICs ( P <0.0001: ET vs.

The median overall survival was not reached for any group receiving [ 225 Ac]Ac-mcp-TDI-Y-010, with highly significant survival benefits observed across all dose levels ( P < 0.0001 for the 9.25- and 18.5-kBq cohorts, P = 0.0002 for the 37.0-kBq cohort) ( Figs. 2B and 2C ).

Analysis of 8-OHdG, a biomarker of oxidative DNA damage, revealed highly significant main effects of diet ( F (2, 30) = 185.6, p < 0.0001) and radiation ( F (1, 30) = 2892, p < 0.0001), as well as a robust interaction between these factors ( F (2, 30) = 177.8, p < 0.0001).

Statistical analysis using the Student’s t -test for related samples showed a highly significant difference between pre- and post-test scores ( p < 0.0001), indicating a strong effect of the intervention on stress reduction.

However, a highly significant and strong correlation ( p < 0.0001) was found between the number of nuclei per OC and the percent eroded surface per bone surface in vitro ( Figure 4 b).

(2) was highly significant (p < 0.0001); while the unfitting F value of 6.09 with p > 0.05, indicated a high degree of precision and credibility of this model.

Single‐sample analysis The paired t ‐test analysis revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) when comparing scores before and after the prosection activity.

Shape ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of genotype on ventricular shape (procrustes ANOVA: F = 9.29, p = 0.0001) and a significant induction × genotype interaction ( F = 2.45, p = 0.0157), indicating that the impact of PKN2 loss on heart shape depends on when the knockout was induced.

Similarly, compound 18 showed significant in vivo efficacy, with a substantial proportion of larvae surviving to the end of the experiment and a highly significant improvement in survival relative to controls ( P = 0.0001).