The main effect of Time was highly significant (F(2.735, 221.6) = 471.8, P < 0.0001), whereas the main effect of Treatment was not significant (F(8,81) = 1.042, P = 0.412).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The median (IQR) growth rate of children pre- and post-tests were −4.0 (−5.4–−2.1) SDS and 0.1 (−1.9–1.4) SDS respectively, a difference highly significant ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3B ).
3.5 Correlation between NSE 48h and mRS at 90 days We found highly significant positive correlation between NSE 48h levels and mRS at 90 days ( r = 0.400 and p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 ).
The logistic regression analysis revealed that 15 out of 19 agronomic factors, including “district” as an independent variable, exhibited a statistically highly significant association ( p < 0.0001) with both CLS incidence and severity when added at first (Analysis I) and last (Analysis III) into the model (Table 3 ).
Both vaccination and time of control were highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001), as was their interaction ( p = 0.0014) with respect to the bPPD IGRA (Figure 2 , panel C).
SIRIUS follow-up results presented at ACC showed that the highly significant differences (p < 0.0001) between the CYPHER stent and bare metal control stent for all clinical event endpoints were sustained at 3-years.
The complex showed highly significant expression levels and complex formation ( P < 0.0001) in all combinations when compared with mock across all capture-detection schemes (fig.
Subjects who received GR showed a highly significant increase in SFN in both zones ( p < 0.0001), similar to levels previously observed in breast tissue after similar supplementation.
This is highly significant, with t (39) = −11, p < 0.0001.
Event-specific cumulative incidence curves were thus estimated from the decomposition of the EFS curves and a computer program (COMPETE) developed at the Institut Gustave-Roussy was used for the calculations. Results obtained using the competing risk approach were compared to the method of ignoring or censoring other events for the data provided here. Results The EFS curves for the three groups are shown in Figure 1. The difference in EFS between the low risk group and both high risk groups was highly significant (P<0.0001).
Moreover, a binomial GLM uncovered a highly significant negative association between S291F frequency and distance from South Georgia ( F 1,7 = 44.72, p < 0.0001). 4.
Nominal logistic regression indicates that the line, age, and line-by-age interaction effects are all highly significant ( p <0.0001, Figure 1C ), but six lines show an opposite trend, ie. reduced failure rate with age.
Full details of the terms are given in Additional file 4 : Tables S3-S8. As a confirmation of the validity of the RNA-seq transcript abundance estimates, a highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.9119, P < 0.0001) was found between the RNAseq and qRT-PCR datasets derived from the abundance of six transcripts in three population samples, Trento, Athens and Ban Rai (Additional file 5 : Figure S2, Additional file 6 : Table S9).
This difference was highly significant ( p <0.0001), showing high breast cancer risk among post-menopausal females.
The chi-square test of likelihood ratio was highly significant (χ2 = 782.15, p < 0.0001), indicating the model’s overall fitness.
14 C-glyphosate Uptake and Translocation Assays The differences in foliar uptake of 14 C-glyphosate between the resistant hairy beggarticks populations compared to the S population were highly significant ( P < 0.0001; DF = 2; n = 60) ( Figure 3A ).
In VPAC2 wildtype (+/+) mice, PK2 mRNA demonstrated a highly significant diurnal expression with calculated peak ZT 5:10 (p-value<0.0001) ( Figure 7 ).
Fisher's exact test indicated highly significant differences across all groups ( p < 0.0001), reinforcing the potential of epitope 5 as a reliable diagnostic marker.
Among the 48 genes that were both DE and DC, there was a highly significant and positive association in the direction of DE and differential genomic coverage (FET P < 0.0001) with only four genes having higher X SR coverage but higher X ST expression.
This pathway was predicted to be downregulated in samples from MRD + patients with a highly significant Benjamini-Hochberg p-value ( p < 0.0001, z-score − 6.245; Fig. 1 C).
3 D , compare lanes 3 and 5; differences were highly significant: P<0.0001).
Using 5-fold cross validation, the multiplicative interaction term was highly significant at each of the cross-validation loops ( p < 0.0001, t-test).
The p -values associated with the functional enrichment of genes were calculated (see Methods ) and the result was highly significant for the “Regulatory” function ( p -value < 10 −4 ) and particularly for the “Zinc-containing proteins” subfunction (see Additional file 4 : Data Sets 1).
A highly significant positive correlation of ELISA results was found for all species, with Um-Zm showing the highest correlation (r s = 0.94; p < 0.0001) ( Figure 6B ).
Whole mite extract responses also differed between groups, with Aca s exhibiting a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001), while Tyr p showed a moderate but notable difference ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 2a ). 3.3.