“highly significant”

Allelic association tests yielded 93 highly significant SNPs (p < 10 -4 , corrected for permutation tests).

subjects who ate no seafood, these differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with Hg levels that were higher 3–7-fold in maternal hair, 7–8-fold in maternal blood, 4–6-fold in the placenta, and >10-fold in cord blood.

S100B showed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) upregulation in the treated hypoxia group (2.114 ± 0.7348) compared to the control group (0.4455 ± 0.1956), whereas the untreated hypoxia group (0.8149 ± 0.4930) was similar to the control group (0.4455 ± 0.1956).

With RNA-seq data, the size of the network is highly significant (p < 0.0001), with 3 transcription factors (GATA3, STAT1, and ESR1) having correlated targets enriched in the results ( Figure 4 B).

The Datta and Satten Rank-Sum Test found that the distributions of the two groups was highly significant giving a test statistic of 8.05 and a two-sided p-value <0.0001.

The data suggest a progressive mean rise in serum PLAP-like AP with increased smoking. This trend is highly significant (P=0.0001) as determined by a Wilcoxon rank regression test (Cuzick, in press).

The percentage of children from urban area had more bleeding than that of rural area and it was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and the percentage of children from rural area had more calculus than that of urban area and it was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) [ Table 2 ].

The Q-test for heterogeneity was highly significant (P<0.0001).

The F -value of 100.83 implies a highly significant model ( P -value < 0.0001), indicating the capability of model terms to explain the variation in the response variable (IZD).

This overall difference between the products was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 3.3.

The separation in the survival distributions for those with perfusion defects and those without perfusion defects was highly significant (log-rank p = 0.0001).

MPS decreased from 5.36 ± 2.85 at baseline to 3.94 ± 2.69 at one-year follow-up, thus undergoing a highly significant change (p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5A ).

The model outputted a distribution of values with highly significant difference in their means (p < .0001) ( Fig 5 ).

Both our cohort and that of Morris et al had a highly significant paired 2-tailed t test for Na + 1 ≠ Na + 2 ( P < 0.0001).

Similarly, GC2 cells exhibited a significant and dose-dependent reduction in sphere formation following treatment with pemigatinib, with both concentrations showing highly significant effects (**** p < 0.0001).

The protection provided by the cocktail was highly significant when compared to individual mAbs m8C4 or FVM09 or control (p < 0.0001).

AUSTRAL medium) had a highly significant effect on the variability of SBF indexes (Wald = 83.73, **** P < 0.0001) (Table 2 ).

Firmness was evaluated for the F 1 formula obtained by the classical preparation method compared to that obtained by automatic preparation ( Table IV ), and the significance level of the t test between the two values, demonstrates a highly significant correlation, with a p < 0.0001 ( Figure 4 ).

Statistical analysis revealed highly significant linear and quadratic effects for all metrics ( P = 0.0001, indicating a complex relationship between selenium dose and growth, with potential for an optimal selenium level.

As anticipated from the SR2508 urinary excretion data, the relationship was highly significant (r = 0.626, P = .0001).

The log-rank test for difference across the categories of CBP was highly significant for all of the end points under study ( p <0.0001).

The correlation between host- and Symbiodiniaceae δ 13 C values was strong and highly significant ( rho = 0.80; P < .0001) ( Fig. 2D ).

Cells expressing the control CYC1 3′UTR reporter showed little difference in the population mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) when Ssd1 was absent (0.87-fold change in expression in ssd1Δ compared to SSD1 ), while cells containing the test CTS1 3′UTR construct exhibited a nearly three-fold, highly significant increase (p<0.0001) in MFI in ssd1Δ cells compared to SSD1 cells ( Figure S1A ).

This difference was highly significant( p < 0.0001) [ 4 ].

The changes with time were, as expected from earlier studies (Lee et al.,, 1991a) very highly significant, but more interestingly so was the interaction between time and dose (P<0.0001).