“highly significant”

The ANOVA results for the Naphtha cut of heavy oil which are presented in Table 10 , indicate that the model as a whole is highly significant, with a p value of < 0.0001 and an F-value of 1518.48, suggesting that the factors included in the model explain a substantial portion of the variability in naphtha yield.

In addition, we discarded SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) <0.1% over the entire data set or with a highly significant departure of individual genotype frequencies from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium expectations ( P < 10 − 4 ) in at least one population.

By comparison, the two missense variants reported here were predicted to be substantially more destabilizing, and this difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001, Student t-test).

As a result, the difference in mortality remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

In addition, the difference between the BA.1 and BA.2 variants was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The primary patient-derived xenografts used for this study displayed a wide range of tumor hypoxia (1%–39%) that was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), whereas there was relatively little variance in the levels of hypoxia within replicates from the same model ( Figure 1 A).

Data are presented in Table 5 and revealed a highly significant association for osteitis at the radius and the three-year radiolunate cartilage score ( P = 0.0001).

Most notably, this includes YAP and TEAD1, with YAP's regulatory role most significantly determined in the mesothelioma cell line, NCI‐H2052 (top two p‐ values, each < .0001) and TEAD1 also yielding a highly significant association ( p < .0001) in the MSTO mesothelioma line.

The ANOVA results for the set (i) showed highly significant and statistically greater Ks in the set of 26 mitogenomes: Ks = 1.618 ± 0.019, Ka = 0.384 ± 0.019 ( n = 325), F = 1949.2, d.f. = 1; 648, p < 0.0001 (effective hypothesis decomposition).

Group differences in slopes of the habituation curves were highly significant ( F (2,86) = 26, P < 0.0001; EE versus SH and EE versus WR P < 0.001 Tukey HSD), with the EE group's curve being much steeper than those of SH or WR rats ( Fig. 2 D).

The comparison of regional deformation parameters measured in subsequent left ventricular segments indicated highly significant linear relationship of values from both methods ( p < 0.0001), although correlation coefficients for measurements performed at baseline were slightly higher than during peak stage of dobutamine test.

For stem diameter, the Treatment effect was not significant across corrections (Greenhouse–Geisser: MS = 6.23, F = 1.27, p = 0.332), but the effect of Time was highly significant (MS = 83.02, F = 123.96, p < 0.0001), showing consistent increases in stem diameter across weeks.

We identified a highly significant difference of the mean scores between the groups with a p -value of <0.0001.

The difference in the proportion of inhibitory and excitatory PPD cells between the L4 and L2 segments was highly significant (Fisher's exact probability test, p < 0.0001).

The calcium model was highly significant ( p -value = 0.0001) and showed no lack of fit ( p -value = 0.9114).

The conclusion about the difference in the richness of ground cover species under the different tree dominant canopies remains highly significant (P < 0.0001) for any block size (5 × 5, 10 × 10, or 20 × 20 m) in an ANOVA with mixed effects regarding the spatial connectivity of plots.

Influence of centrifugation and residual platelet count on plasma PAI-1 activity levels, euglobulin clot lysis time (ECLT) and global fibrinolytic capacity (GFC) of plasma Correlation of plasma PAI-1 activity levels with ECLT and GFC was statistically highly significant, with a Pearson coefficient of 0.63 ( p < 0.0001) and 0.64 ( p < 0.0001), respectively.

The difference in mean value of FBG showed a highly significant decrease ( P < 0.0001) from baseline to end of treatment, i.e., from 167.0, (59.16) 172.6 (58.51) and 171.0 (39.47) to 140.2, (26.46) 143.8 (22.04) and 138.5 (27.82) mg/dL.

ANOSIM detected highly significant differences in meristic counts between intensive and organic lots (R = 0.04; p<0.0001).

Tapias had the highest reliability with a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001) ( 29 ).

The differences between a combined VV-PJS-5 and VSV low-dose vaccination, on the one hand, and a combined VV-hTAP1,2 and VSV low-dose vaccination, on the other hand, were highly significant (z-statistic = 4.701, p < 0.0001).

The FT-B1 alleles showed highly significant differences in heading time ( P< 0.0001) within both alleles of FT-A1 , but the differences between the adjusted means of the FT-B1 alleles were 34% larger in the lines homozygous for the mutant ft-A1 allele (25.0 day delay in flowering) than in the lines homozygous or heterozygous for the wild type FT-A1 allele (18.6 day delay).

The pair group comparisons of day 7 v/s day 15, day 45, and 6 months showed a highly significant difference of 0.64, 1.48, and 1.80, respectively, and P value = 0.0001.

The foliar area consumed with infestation at flowering ( Fig 9 Left) showed a highly significant effect of Species, Stage, Variety, Species x Variety and Species x Stage x Variety (p<0.0001 in all the cases), as well as a Stage x Species (p = 0.0019) and Stage x Variety (p = 0.0042).

These group differences were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).