A highly significant interaction term between time and group was found (p<0.0001) revealing a statistically significant different evolution of the 6MWD for intervention and control groups ( figure 2 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Also, 77.5% of the isolates were capable of forming biofilms and a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.0001) was found between biofilm formation and multidrug resistance.
In addition, we found a highly significant association between tumours with concomitant CIS and low ANXA10 expression ( P <0.0001, χ 2 -test).
While in the control condition, no significant differences were observed between the percentage of Hi versus Li ROI, the treatments from the 1 h time point to 24 h revealed a highly significant decrease in the Hi-ROIs compared to Li-ROIs (**** p < 0.0001 Hi vs.
A Hotelling’s T 2 test confirmed that this difference was highly significant ( T 2 = 685.25, P < 0.0001).
Ordinary one-way ANOVA showed highly significant differences among the four severity groups for all three proteins (all P < 0.0001).
One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference between groups [ F (5,16) = 86.47, P < .0001, R 2 = 0.96], with significant variance heterogeneity detected by Brown-Forsythe ( P < .0001).
On the opposite, there was a highly significant difference between these two tasks concerning the number of characters involved per sentence ( p <0.0001, Table 1 ), in keeping with the social nature of the TOM stimuli.
The ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect (F = 11.54; p < 0.0001), with an R 2 value of 0.4903, indicating that almost 50% of the observed variability is explained by the model.
Haematological Parameters Comparing infected and non-infected tilapias, the infected tilapias show a highly significant increase in white blood cells count compared to non-infected ones ( p < 0.0001).
Dance-compound introduction resulted in a highly significant increase in the number of dance bouts versus the solvent control (t = 5.16, d.f. = 39, Tukey-Kramer adjusted p<0.0001).
Two-way analysis of variance indicated a highly significant (p<0.0001) reduction of 46% in 125 I-SI Ang II binding in the brains of the neurolysin knockout strain.
Effects of miR-485 on NOI were highly significant by one-way ANOVA ( F 4,25 = 26.15, p < 0.0001).
The between‐group survival differences were highly significant (log‐rank test, p < 0.0001).
coli ATCC 25922; the bacterial LOD was 10 2 –10 3 CFU/mL, with highly significant signal differences ( p < 0.0001).
The estimated variance components for genotype were highly significant (P<0.0001) at both seedling and adult plant stages ( Table 1 ).
Consequently, comparing cases with the G/G genotype to controls with the G/G genotype, there was a highly significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean TAS value: 0.049 (p<0.0001).
nose position in HC and TC (Figures 3C,D ) indicated highly significant body posture differences (slope differences: U = 143; P < 0.0001) in shocked vs. non-shocked mice in the first 15 min after reopening the door (Figure 3E ).
The percentage reduction from baseline disability scores revealed substantially greater therapeutic efficacy in group B, with a mean reduction of 65.20% with a standard deviation of 14.67% compared to 46.26% with a standard deviation of 18.42% in group A, yielding highly significant differences (t = -4.187; p = 0.0001) and a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.183).
All correlations were highly significant (P<0.0001).
Results A highly significant correlation between comprehensive and simplified US assessment was found ( P = 0.0001).
The test revealed a highly significant effect ( P = 0.0001) of elevation on the community structure of mayflies, explaining 15.6% of the variance in species composition across the 31 sampled sites (Supplementary Table S2 ).
Genotypic effects were highly significant in nearly all environments ( p < 0.0001); the sole exception was 23_WL, where IR was non-significant ( p = 0.0876) and both traits showed low heritability (IR: H 2 = 0.19, h 2 = 0.03; SV: H 2 = 0.27, h 2 = 0.05) (Table 1 ), consistent with uneven disease pressure.
Consistent with the recognition of EBV tetramers, the differences in the responses of SAP + and SAP − CD8 + T cells to in vitro stimulation with EBV peptides were highly significant ( p = 0.0001; Figure 3E ).
Highly significant difference were also found between the scores of four education groups (p = 0.0001).