“highly significant”

The linear regression reveals a strong, positive, and statistically highly significant correlation between the AFB smear grade and the MPT64 concentration ( R = 0.777, P < 0.0001) ( Figure 1B ).

All log-rank tests confirmed highly significant differences across Ig groups ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1 ).

However, residential area showed a highly significant difference among CNV burden groups ( P < 0.0001), with the high CNV group having a greater proportion of Ansan residents compared to the low CNV group.

The baseline AIS grade effect on the fraction of two-grade improvements in the STASCIS and the present study’s databases were both highly significant, p < 0.0001.

We found highly significant correlation between USP18 and PTEN expression levels in Mem for all tested subjects ( P < 0.0001, r = 0.9511; n = 30) ( Fig 2B ).

When the analysis was performed according to the lesion size, a statistically significant difference was noted in the detection rate of DWI and T 2 -TSE for both types of metastatic lesions (lesions with size <10 mm and lesions with size >10 mm), and the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for lesions <10 mm in which DWI detected 38 more lesions compared with T 2 -TSE.

The paired t-test values between NZ and SC are highly significant for Olsen P t (1, 19) 5.45, p < 0.0001; Total N t (1, 19) 4.73, p < 0.0001, and pH t (1, 19) -18.4, p < 0.0001 respectively.

Fumarate levels showed a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.0001), while succinate levels were also significantly lower ( p = 0.005) in both strains following treatment ( Figure 9 D).

The regression analysis for DPPH IC50 response, the individual component coefficients (β1,β2, β3), and the ternary interaction term (β123) were all highly significant (p < 0.0001), showing individual oil effects and their combination effects in a significant manner on DPPH radical scavenging activity.

Notably, the combination treatment group (PLX3397 + shIDO-ST) exhibited a highly significant reduction in CD206 + F4/80 + cells compared to untreated tumors and single agent-treated tumors ( Figure 5F , p < 0.0001, ANOVA), indicating a potentially synergistic effect on reducing M2 TAMs.

Locomotor function during nigrostriatal lesion progression Prior to random assignment into NE or EX groups, reduced forelimb use was confirmed in 6-OHDA lesioned rats on day 7 (1 wk) post-lesion (F (1,29) = 64.6, p < 0.0001), with highly significant difference between sham and lesion groups (Sham, 105.7 ± 2.6%; 6-OHDA, 46 ± 4.3%) (F (1,31) = 97.8, p < 0.0001), but not between rats assigned to NE or EX groups prior to initiating exercise (F (1,31) = 0.13, p = 0.72) ( Fig. 3A ).

The effect of RA group on MCS was highly significant (F(3, 2320) = 164.22, p < 0.0001), with a large effect size (partial η 2 = 0.175; ω 2 = 0.175).

Season × region interactions were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating strong environmental modulation of milk trace mineral profiles. 3.2.

Wound contraction percentage after 20 days was 96.1 ± 0.27% which was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and the epithelialization period was 23.67 ± 2.05 days ( p < 0.01) for HAM + AgNPs which was preferable to the positive control, AgNPs, HAM, and negative control; also, the histopathologic observation using hematoxylin and eosin, and Masson's trichrome staining were showed the better healing progress for HAM + AgNPs.

The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a highly significant effect of propolis extract concentration on bacterial growth inhibition (χ 2 = 116.66, df = 9, p < 0.0001).

Conversely, highly significant differences were observed comparing NMRs between the LICs ( P <0.0001: ET vs.

A secondary analysis for risk score categories expressed a highly significant detrimental effect on OS and RFS for higher RS ( P < 0.0001) as in Fig. 2 .

For instance, for the 2.5% trials with the lowest OpticF, a regression of the L F P 4 − 16 H z power on Synch had an R 2 = 0.096 which was highly significant ( t -test p < 0.0001 ).

However, 139 were previously reported lamin interactors ( 3 , 17 ), a highly significant enrichment (two-tailed chi-square test, p < 0.0001; Supplemental Table S4 , Test 1).

Thus, we calculated that the likelihood of 15 consecutive successes (= correct identification of slides) was (l/2) 15 = 6.1 × 10 -5 , which means that the result is highly significant (p < 0.0001) and unlikely to consequence of chance.

Results Plasma 5‐hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5‐HIAA), the major metabolite of serotonin (5‐HT), was significantly higher in delirious and non‐delirious cognitively impaired subjects as compared to control individuals without delirium and cognitive impairment ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.007), which remained highly significant after excluding patients taking psychotropic medication ( p < 0.0001 and p = 0.003).

Compared with the control group, the 1 μM-treated group showed a significant reduction in viability ( p < 0.05), whereas the 2 μM-treated group exhibited a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.0001), as well as a significant reduction compared with the 1 μM-treated group ( p < 0.05).

Considering the Student test (Table 3 ), it is clear that the drying, in linear term (x 1 ) and in quadratic term (x 1 2 ), had according to the most two important coefficients: which is confirmed by a very highly significant influence ( p < 0.0001) according to the tested dependent response (extracted essential oil yield, Y).

In the present study, untreated diabetic animals (Group II) exhibited a marked increase in water intake, reaching mean values of 31.2 ± 9.4 mL/day, compared to 10.8 ± 3.2 mL/day in the normal control group (Group I), the difference being highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Effect of Process Variables on Sphericity Factor and Roundness Table 2 shows that both the sphericity factor and roundness were significantly influenced by the independent variables with highly significant regression models ( p < 0.0001), high coefficients of determination (R 2 > 0.98) and non-significant lack of fit ( p > 0.05).