“highly significant”

In support of this pattern, within‐group comparisons yielded a highly significant difference between use of flat geometry versus materiality indicators in painters ( F (1, 120) = 22.36, p < .0001), and to a lesser degree in sculptors ( F (1, 120) = 5.6, p < .05) and controls ( F (1, 120) = 6.93, p < .05), but not in architects ( F (1, 120) = 2.32, p = .13) .

This difference was highly significant (Χ 2 = 16.9, df = 1, p<0.0001).

The within‐design heterogeneity is highly significant ( Q = 75.37, p < 0.0001).

Including genotype in the mixed model had highly significant effects on period ( χ 2 (1 d.f.) = 455.57, p < .0001) and RAE ( χ 2 (1) = 65.97, p < .0001).

Our χ 2 analysis indicated that these group differences were highly significant ( Figure 7 ; χ 2 =36.7; df=1, p=0.0001), suggesting that the HIP14 knockout disrupts behavior-related correlated firing in striatum.

albopictus ), with statistical analysis (permutation test in MorphoJ) indicating highly significant differences between most of these species ( p < 0.0001; p < 0.01; and p < 0.05; S2 Table ).

The main effects of treatment (experimental or control) and sex to body size were both highly significant (two-way ANOVA: P < 0.0001, Table 1 ).

The differences among groups were highly significant at each time point ( p < 0.0001).

−2.1 ± 5.5; p < 0.005), the relationship between change in cg05575921 and change was present and highly significant for both those who managed to fully quit smoking ( p < 0.0001; adjusted R 2 = 0.62) as well as those who attempted to quit smoking ( p < 0.0001; adjusted R 2 = 0.70). 4.

The difference in MDA levels between the healthy and erlotinib groups was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

A highly significant correlation was observed between nuclear matrix protein level and 8-OHdG, highest in SA for BLCA-4 ( R = 0.583, p = 0.0001) ( Table 6 ).

Effects of MOEE and Curcumin on Brain of Glutathione Level The brain GSH level showed a highly significant difference in PTZ-treated groups compared with control groups (*** p < 0.0001).

We found a moderate but highly significant negative correlation between high SMAD1 expression and KEGG Apoptosis pathway inhibition across the ~ 1000 CCLE cell lines ( R = -0.1486, p < 0.0001) (Fig.

We found a highly significant negative relationship (p < 0.0001) between the proximity of consecutive foraging sites at pair level and the mean invertebrate abundance, suggesting that snowfinches return to the same patch also when the mean invertebrate abundance is high, while the opposite trend was found in relationship to invertebrate richness.

The difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The overall F ST and Ф ST values both showed highly significant isolation among all populations ( F ST = 0.20, p < .0001; Ф ST = 0.74, p < .0001).

The highly significant differences in plasma progesterone levels between the follicular and premenstrual phases were equally strong for both groups (p < 0.0001).

The results depicted in Figure 3 - for the TBRs, mf prevalence breakpoints and R 0 - show not only that a wide distribution of values is consistent with the data in each study community when the model is fitted to mf age prevalence but also that they can vary significantly between the study communities [kruskal-wallis tests of differences in estimated values of each variable indicating highly significant study effects in each case ( P < 0.0001 in each case)].

As expected, there was a highly significant positive relationship between time post-blood meal and the proportion of mosquitoes showing ruptured oocysts (LRT χ 1 2 = 95 , p < 0.0001, figure 4 a ).

[ 6 , 7 , 15 ] conducted a series of studies that revealed the prognosis for high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities metastatic to the lung, with a 5-year EFS rate of 36% for patients with localized disease who later relapsed and 9% for patients with resectable lung metastases at presentation; the difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

This difference was found to be highly significant ( χ 2 = 285.32, p < 0.0001).

The impaired ability of the Exon 12 −/− mice to run on the rotorod at greater than moderate speeds is the most obvious and highly significant phenotype of the behavioral testing ( P < 0.0001).

In contrast, the regression was significant (ANOVA: F 1,198 = 113.3754, P< 0.0001) but the Lack-of-Fit was also highly significant (ANOVA: F 8,190 = 22.9589, P< 0.0001) for the Explicit-Shaping bees over the entire set of covered trials (trials 11–20).

This difference is highly significant ( χ 2 = 3716.3, d.f. = 1, p < 0.0001).

Looking at all SBT, which were terminated due to exhaustion, shows that the duration of the SBT has a highly significant impact on EAdi ( p < 0.0001).