Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Though this gene has been used in the literature [ 39 ], performance of this gene in our mouse panel was mediocre, and as shown in Fig 6A , the raw (non-normalized) data for B2M in our mouse muscle dataset does appear to suggest a highly significant (P = 0.0002) increase in B2M expression in dystrophic tissue.
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The H1: TAA noncarriers showed highly significant higher average procalcitonin levels (5.1 ± 9.7 ng/dL vs. 3.5 ± 9.1 ng/dL; p = 0.0002) as well as significantly lower urine outputs (2792 ± 1242 mL/day vs. 3060 ± 1370 mL/day; p = 0.0229) over the observation period than the H1: TAA-positive patients. 4.
highly significantP = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This correlation is highly significant for the 24 non-agricultural strains ( r 2 = 0.47, P = 0.0002) while it was not significant for the 31 agricultural strains ( r 2 = 0.03, P = 0.33), suggesting that the relationship between aggressiveness and sclerotial production differ among these two populations of strains.
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This meta-analysis failed to show any benefits of adjuvant bisphosphonates in premenopausal women, but highly significant improvements in bone recurrence (RR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.60–0.86, 2 p = 0.0002) and breast cancer mortality (RR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.73–0.93, 2 p = 0.002) were seen in the 11,767 postmenopausal women included in the meta-analysis.
Bone-Targeted Agents and Metastasis Prevention.
Cancers (Basel) · 2022 · PMC9367604
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparison of relative T m of soluble HLA monomers with normalized anti-HLA MFI values generated by the cell-based assay revealed a striking and highly significant correlation at peptide concentrations of 100 μM (R = 0.87, p = 0.0002) and 10 μM (R = 0.85, p = 0.0004) ( Figures 3 D and 3E).
highly significantP < 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Contribution to the Next Years’ Spring Peak We investigated the correlation between the abundance of the spring generation (dependent variable) and the abundance of either of the two generations the year before (independent variables) with a multiple linear regression model: the contribution of the second generation to the abundance in spring next year is highly significant ( R 2 = 0.80, P < 0.0002), while the contribution of the first generation is not significant ( R 2 = 0.17, P = 0.21) ( Figure A8 a).