There is also a mild but highly significant correlation between the total number of targets involved in a combination and percentile of cell lines in which it is synergistic (Spearman’s ρ = 0.21, P = 6.25 × 10 −42 ), (Fig. 6A ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The neighboring gene Pearson correlations were also found to be highly significant ( C. dubliniensis/C. albicans Pearson correlation = 0.218, p = 6.4 × 10 -42 ; C. tropicalis/C. dubliniensis Pearson correlation = 0.103, p = 9.8 × 10 -10 ).
There were highly significant main effects for emotion (F (2,155) = 171.744, p = 7.4 × 10 −42 , η p 2 = 0.708), agency (F (1,71) = 630.212, p = 4.9 × 10 −37 , η p 2 = 0.899) and intentionality (F (1,71) = 11.799, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.143), regardless of serotonergic status, which supports task validity and suggests individuals were attuned to the social context of the scenarios.
Here, using genome sequences from 11,670 women, we observed a highly significant association between a stress-related disease, major depression, and the amount of mtDNA (p = 9.00 × 10 −42 , odds ratio 1.33 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29–1.37]) and telomere length (p = 2.84 × 10 −14 , odds ratio 0.85 [95% CI = 0.81–0.89]).
A non-parametric test revealed that the difference was highly significant (Mann-Whitney, p = 9.2 × 10 −42 ).
A t-test comparison at TSS for the random sample and the origin peaks demonstrated a highly significant difference (p<10 −41 , Fig.
This result is highly significant (p=10 –41 , exact ranks test, MATLAB signrank ) and holds for all tested pitch classes in the pair ([0,3,6,9], Figure 4D ).
The water-sensitive Predictive model ( P w ) was the winning model, outperforming the second best model, the water-sensitive Reactive model ( R w ), by a highly significant 95 log likelihood units ( χ 2 (2) = 190, p < 10 −41 ).
IPA identified a highly significant network ( p < 10 −41 ) containing 20 of the 64 (31%) input genes and 15 bridging genes ( Figure 2 ).
This difference is statistically highly significant (p = 1.2 10 -41 ; Chi-square test with 1 degree of freedom).
Chi-square tests yielded the most highly significant results for terpenoids ( p = 1.2 × 10 −41 ), amino acids and derivatives ( p = 1.6 × 10 −35 ), flavonoids ( p = 3.1 × 10 −33 ), lipids ( p = 4.8 × 10 −15 ), flavonols ( p = 1.8 × 10 −12 ), phenolic acids ( p = 2.6 × 10 −12 ), and flavones ( p = 1.1 × 10 −11 ). 3.2.
The results of this hypergeometric distribution analysis verified a highly significant overlap of 39 ( P = 1.46e−41).
1 , 5 ) revealed a highly significant difference across all four groups of neurons (control SWA, lesioned SWA, control activated, lesioned activated; Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA, χ 2 = 211, p = 1.60e-41).
Although Aβ and tau oligomer levels showed a highly significant correlation (Spearman r = .541, p = 2.7 × 10 −41 ), no increase of tau oligomer levels regarding the disease stage was observed (Figure 1B ).
cerevisiae proteasome genes, the enrichment of genes containing the known Rpn4p binding site was highly significant (GGTGGCAA; p < 6 × 10 –41 ).
A highly significant association was found between the two tests ( p = 6.09 × 10 −41 ).
Sets of DEGs between treatments were partially overlapping and we observed that the intersection of genes that differed between PMD and controls regardless of LCL treatment was highly significant (probability density p<6.49e −41 , Figure 2A ).
When normalized, manual analysis accuracy for N-T tissues increased from 0.75 to 0.91, which was highly significant (p=7,72x10 -41 ).
The difference among three genotypes was highly significant both in males (p < 1E-40) and females (p = 1E-33).
All correlations are highly significant (p < 1.0E-40).
Other miRNAs were not ranked at the top 30 of comparative activity mode (Methods), however they show highly significant differential activity (corrected WRS p -value < 1 e −40) and substantial activity in at least one of the populations (activity p -values below 1 e − 4 among at least third of cells in at least one population).
mikatae analyses were highly significant, with hypergeometric p -values < 10 -40 .
All differences in the prevalence of deafness between each endpoint were highly significant with all p < 10 −40 .
(2016) , with a highly significant overlap in the composition of each defect group between cohorts (minimal P -value <1 × 10 −40 ; Fisher's exact test) ( Supplemental Fig.
(A) motifs that are highly significant (Benjamini-Hochberg corrected p < 10 −40 , odds ratio > 10) are listed here.