The difference in diversity was highly significant (t = 3.34, df = 501.72, p = 0.0009).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
P value for such increased cell death rate was calculated by Repeated Measures ANOVA analysis and the results were highly significant (p = 0.0009).
At Day 12, highly significant reductions were observed in tumor width (*** p = 0.0009), length (** p = 0.0017), and volume (*** p = 0.0007) relative to control, whereas the tablet showed only modest effects on width (* p = 0.036) and volume (* p = 0.0379) and no significant effect on length ( p = 0.2243).
In contrast, the Digit Span Backward (Number of Correct Responses) revealed significant improvements in both the right ATL group ( p = 0.025) and the left ATL group ( p = 0.014), with an overall highly significant improvement observed across both groups ( p = 0.0009).
Bivariate logistic regression showed a highly significant positive correlation between global placental DNA methylation and the presence of GDM ( p = 0.0009).
The results showed that patient identity had no significant effect ( P = 0.336), while time had a highly significant effect ( P = 9.00e-4).
The subsequent meta‐regression analysis revealed that the risk of bias was a highly significant moderator of the placebo effect ( p = 0.0009), explaining 100% of the between‐study heterogeneity ( I 2 residual = 0%).
When this cohort was stratified based on low and high FABP12 expression levels, the association between BIRC5 and patient survival became insignificant in the subpopulation with low levels of FABP12 (HR = 2.22, p = 0.56; Figure 6 E), but remained highly significant in the subpopulation with high levels of FABP12 (HR = 4.28, p = 0.0009; Figure 6 F).
The pollen viability analysis showed that the pollen fertility of S 14 generation was significantly higher than that of S 4 generation, and had a statistically highly significant difference ( P = 0.0009).
In each case, we counted ∼400 stained SW620 cells expressing LacZ or hTRM9L and observed a highly significant difference ( p = 0.0009) in GLUT1 expression.
Overall, in this group there was a highly significant association between infection with S. glossinidius and T. b. rhodesiense infection ( P = 0.0009, Fisher’s exact test).
In contrast, the study results indicated highly significant correlations between SM and chronic disease (χ 2 = 10.846, p = .0009) as well as the absence of medical insurance (χ 2 = 84.175, p = .0001) ( Table 4 ).
None of the recurrent smokers continued smoking during the study period and showed a highly significant difference ( p = 0.0009) when compared with the non-recurrent smokers.
In contrast, a comparison of the parabolic coefficients between the lCF size profile (Table S2 ) and FC profiles (Table S1 ) revealed a strong and highly significant difference ( F (1,11) = 21.85, p = 0.0009, d = 1.41).
In addition, to quantitatively estimate the difference between survival curves for control conditions and SMIFH2 treatment, the nonparametric logrank test 39 was used, which revealed the highly significant difference ( p = 0.0009).
Nevertheless, there was highly significant (p=0.0009) and moderate heterogeneity ( I 2 =46%) among studies.
The odds ratio (OR) for developing symptomatic brain metastasis in the HER2-positive versus HER2-negative population was highly significant at 8.26 (95%CI 2.09–35.60; p = 0.0009).
On control surfaces, a highly significant increase in plaque accumulation was observed from Day 1 to Day 2 ( p = 0.0009), then a constant increase occurred each day until Day 5.
The abnormal scores and frequencies of falls in EquiTest conditions 5 and 6 were highly significant, with a p = 0.0009.
We also observed highly significant similarities between MZs when only presence and absence were taken into account by the Jaccard method (not considering the number of samples per set, p = 0.0009).
There was no decline in serum IL-1β levels after three months therapy with IVA/LUM ( Figure 2B ), and yet IVA/TEZ treatment resulted in a highly significant reduction in serum IL-1β (p=0.0009, Figure 2F ; compare 2B).
In the 1‐back condition, accuracy scores were 9.6% lower in survivors (mean = 84.3, SD = 9.1) than controls (mean = 93.3, SD = 5.5), which was highly significant between groups ( t (41) = −3.6, p = .0009).
Importantly, the twofold reduction in HIV-1 Env fusion activity was calculated to be highly significant ( p = 0.0009).
late was also highly significant ( P = 0.0009).
For the Chinese HP the median difference between the correct identifications of the SIT-12 (10.0 (2.0)) and Ch-SIT-12 (11.0 (1.25) was highly significant (p<0.0009).